The Diary of Anne Frank is about a girl that kept a diary while hiding from Nazis in Amsterdam for two years. The diary ends when the Nazis found her and her family. Her whole family was killed in exception for her father. She was given the journal on her thirteenth birthday.
She simply summarized her life for two years in this phenomenal journal. This journal was found after she was killed. The book was published in 1947. Twenty-five million copies were sold and it was written in fifty-four languages. Basically there have been a lot of reviews on this literary work. Many people have had a great deal of criticism over the Diary of Anne Frank.
From great authors to simple students, all have had their own perspective and view on this everlasting and most memorable book. This truly shows how the Diary of Anne Frank is one of the most widely read books in the world. Anne Franks diary was probably the first work that people actually got too see what the Holocaust was all about. Certainly it must be the best book for the subject. The diary brings together her childhood and then only known surviving footage of Anne Frank.
This is a great way to describe a portrait of Annes life, character flaws, and everything else. In order to enjoy this piece of literary work, you must first learn the importance on Jewish culture. This work is like no other of any Holocaust books. This is actually a way to experience the painful experience the Jewish people had to endure during this awful and evil period of time. This story takes us into the eyes of Anne Frank.
The Holocaust in literally brought to life. This literary work truly shows how Anne Frank was a martyr of racism and an insightful chronicler of her tim period and place. The work also shows the typical adolescence of Anne Frank and her constant arguments with her mother in particular. It also deals with the day to day hiding she and her family went through. The only problem with the book is that the fact that Anne Frank rewrote her diary about two months before she was captured because she wanted her journal to be published after the war and she wanted to peruse a career in journalism. Therefore it is hard to tell what existed in her original copy and how much did she add afterwards.
This tells us that we will never know how much knowledge Anne Frank possessed. It is not the information that should be questioned, but the chronology. Anne Franks diary is an invaluable historical account. The book shows no detail on what was re-written, maybe because the information is not available. The answer to the question of whether or not Anne Franks Diary is a reasonable assessment is no because certain excerpts were taken beforehand.
Review By Carrie Gor ringe, Review. She meant to say that the Diary of Anne Frank was a good way to experience the Holocaust but at the same time there is a lot of missing information. She is trying to say that there must be critical facts that are not shown in the book due to that fact that it was rewritten shortly before her death and the fact that it was translated into different languages. She reviews it as a great source of actually living the Holocaust through the eyes of Anne Frank but also to be in tuned that perhaps a lot of information is simply just not there. This critic tried to say that without the missing evidence, there is a lot of knowledge we are missing. She explains how without this knowledge one cannot truly see everything the young girl, Anne Frank, saw throughout this dreadful time of the Holocaust.
The reviewer tells us that there are too many missing links which the editors of the diary are maybe trying to hide or maybe everything just simply never found. The saddest part in the Diary of Anne Frank is the part where the book talks about how Anne Frank talked to her friend Hanne li Gos lar across a barb-wired barrier at the Bergen Belsen concentration camp shortly before her death. This book achieves much of its greatness through the specific details it brings out. In my opinion she re-wrote her diary with posterity in her mind. The literary work follows with the family destruction.
The diary is seen as dreadful. The works most forceful source was the testament of the power of understand ment. -Stephen Holden, review. This critic was trying to give a lot of recognition to this piece of work. He tries to talk about the saddest points in the book in order to show how great he thinks the diary is. He tries to talk about Anne Franks family more than Anne herself to create a sense of diversity in the diary.
He tries to exaggerate the sad moments in Anne Franks life and her family in order to make his point across on how horrible the Holocaust era really was. This literary work, The Diary of Anne Frank, was criticized worldwide by many different individuals. One would expect this book to be widely criticized for the fact that it dealt with the most gruesome and horrible era in the history of the world, the Holocaust, and for the fact that it helps us journey through this painful experience through the eyes of a young adolescent Jewish girl. Many love this book for its great purpose, but at the same time feel that not all of it is told. For whatever reason they may think, they feel that a lot of the diary was forgotten and will probably ever be told. Perhaps these missing links will never be distributed for the simple fact that maybe the facts were in the original copy of the diary and not the rewritten version that Anne Frank created very shortly before her death.
Also, her father was the one that found her diary. Many believe that he might have edited the diary too. Many believe that because of the rewritten version, the missing pieces of the diary are relevant and crucial which we will probably never get to encounter.