Response to Pocahontas People today tend to scrutinize every aspect of anything that crosses the silver screen. The Disney company is always questioned on the reality of their films. Some see racism, bias, or ignorance toward history. Now for a cartoon thats supposed to entertain children, Disney does it the best. They do it so well that some argue that the people who criticize Disney are the ones who have the problem.
But when Disney makes a film they have to keep one thing in mind when they do it. They have to understand that what they show to children those kids are going to see that, and except that as the truth. Take for example the movie Pocahontas by Disney. This is a film with many flaws that could eventually lead kids off the truth behind the real story of Pocahontas. Pocahontas was a real story with real people. By Disney taking that film and putting their own twist on it, they could lead an entire generation of kids away from whats true.
Disney was wrong when they made the movie because what they showed wasnt the truth, and by taking history and changing it around is just unethical. Jaquelyn Kilpatrick tries to make that same point on an essay about relatively the same thing. Jaquelyn Kilpatrick states, Instead of progress in depicting Native Americans, this film takes a step backwards a very dangerous step because it is so carefully glossed as authentic and respectful (74). Kilpatrick points out that Pocahontas was supposed to be the most PC of all the Disney movies ever. But the backbone of her thesis is that it didnt pay attention to any of the facts about Pocahontas life because it was so politically correct.
She also argues, For one thing, she was not a voluptuous young woman when she met John Smith but a ten- to twelve-year-old girl, and John Smith was a thirty-something mercenary who more resembled a brick than a blonde Adonis (74). Disney not only clouded the story of a young girl who was kidnapped and raped by English settlers, but they even portrayed her looks totally wrong. Besides her beautiful more Asian eyes, he gave her a body with a wasp waist, sexy hips and legs, and breasts that are truly impressive (76). She also went on to explain the misrepresentation of the English settlers. She points out the English in the film are extremely one-dimensional in their bumbling greed (76).
Disney not all stereotyped all English as money hungry bandits, but they also stereotyped all Native American as ready to fall head over heels for the first white man who comes their way. Kilpatrick goes on saying they changed her age, her body, and gave her a motive for her actions that boils down to going gaga over the first white man she sees (74). But the one point that Kilpatrick stated over an over was that Disney changed the truth behind the story of Pocahontas. Pocahontas was changed to leave a smile on everyones face. The story of Pocahontas wasnt a happy love story; it was a tragic story of a young girl. Pocahontas was a girl who was kidnapped and raped by the English settlers.
She was then married to a tobacco planter named John Rolf and went to England, only to die of smallpox on the journey to return home. Personally, I agree with every point that Kilpatrick presented in her argument. The story of Pocahontas wasnt Disneys type story, but Disney turned it into one for the sake of money. Disney saw an open market for a Native American story, and they went for it sacrificing history for a dollar. Disney wanted to do something for a culture that has never been honored before, the Native Americans. But they did it in exchange for history.
Native Americans where honored but not through the true story of Pocahontas. Pocahontas and Disneys Pocahontas are two different people. But in the eyes of children everywhere when they think of a Native American story theyll think of Disneys. Its a sad thing that something like a movie could change something like the real story of Pocahontas. Out there is a generation of kids who went to see a real good movie.
But the movie that was supposed to be the truth really wasnt. The movie was something twisted and molded to satisfy an audience that wouldnt be happy with violence, and unattractive people. Kilpatrick made a point with this article. The point being that this movie could have a much larger effect than expected. So if you ever ask a little kid who saw the movie what happened to Pocahontas, and you get she met John Smith and fell in love well then Disney has succeeded. Because that kid represents a million others who have no clue what really happened to the Powhatan people back in the early seventeenth century..