Introduction The increasing use of non-tenure-track faculty began in the 1970 s as a response to projected enrollment declines and continued in the following decades based upon budgetary constraints. Over the last thirty years non-tenure faculty has grown from 22 percent in 1970-71 to over 50% percent by 2001. Part-time faculty holds an estimated 43 percent of faculty appointments and non-tenure-track full-time faculty holds approximately 20 percent. There is a large body of research identifying the changing conditions in the academic world that have lead to the increased use of non-tenure-track faculty, especially the largest group, the part-timers.

The major contributing factors for administrators to hire more part-time faculty are cost factors, flexibility and particular institutional needs especially for 2-year community colleges. The increased use of part-time faculty is affecting the quality of education and the literature shows that there both benefits and costs resulting from this shift in faculty composition. What was seen as a temporary hedge to fluctuating budgets and enrollment numbers has now become a permanent part of the faculty structure in higher education. There is growing call for the development of comprehensive plans for better incorporation, management, and personnel policies for part-time faculty. The AAUP believes that excessive use, inadequate compensation and professional support for part-time faculty exploits this group of faculty members and undermines academic freedom, academic quality and professional standards.

This study is an attempt to increase state-specific knowledge about part-time faculty that will assist in the policy-analysis process. The purpose of this research is to identify and quantify the use of the non-tenure-track faculty in higher education institutions in Arkansas over the past twelve years. Good policies can only be developed based upon good knowledge of the differences among and between part-time faculty and full-time faculty. The results of this study will provide information and further understanding of the trends occurring in Arkansas with respect to part-time faculty. In addition, the research will hopefully provide an understanding of what has occurred in Arkansas's higher education institutions in relationship to comparable national trends. Reference ListTuckman, H.

P. , Caldwell, J. , & V ogler, W. (1978). Part-timers and the Academic Labor Market of the Eighties. The American Sociologist, 13 (4), 184-195.

American Association of University Professors. Committee G. (1992). On the Status of Non-Tenure-Track Faculty. Academe, 78 (6), 39-48.

Gappa, J. M. (1984). Employing Part-Time Faculty: Thoughtful Approaches to Continuing Problems. AA HE Bulletin, 37 (2), 3-7.

National Education Association. Higher Education Research Center. (1997). Part-time Employment in Academe.

NEA Update, 3 (1), 1-6. Schuster, J. H. (1998). Reconfiguring the Professoriate: An Overview. Academe, 84 (1), 48-53.

(1998). Statement from the Conference on the Growing Use of Part-Time and Adjunct Faculty. Academe, 84 (1), 54-60. Yang, S. , & Zak, M. W.

(1981). Part-Time Faculty in Ohio: A Statewide Study. Kent, OH: Kent State University, Office of Human Resource Utilization. Gappa, J. M. , & Leslie, D.

W. (1993). The Invisible Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Kroll, K. (1994).

A Profile and Perspective of Part-Time Two-Year College English Faculty. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 21 (4), 277-86. Leslie David W. (1978). The Part-time Faculty Labor Force.

in D. W. Leslie (ed), Employing Part-time Faculty, New Directions for Institutional Research; 5, (pp. 1-15). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. American Association of University Professors.

Committee G. (1992). On the Status of Non-Tenure-Track Faculty. Academe, 78 (6), 39-48.

American Association of University Professors website: web P. , Laurence, D. , & Denham, R. R. (1988). When Solutions Become Problems: Taking a Stand on Part-Time Employment.

Academe, 84 (3), 15-9.