Agenda For The Call Of The Wild example essay topic
The best thing about this book is that your view will change as you get older and wiser. For example I read this book in sixth grade and then again as a third year student and my views have change. Presently this book informs me that one's life may end up different then the life they started. Also you change depends on the world that surrounds them such as people, environment, and life experiences just to name a few. I believe that The Call of the Wild is one of the best books written, because it educate the readers that throughout life you will continue to learn and be thought.
In this paper I will explain Social Darwinist and the terms, technique I us to base the true agenda, and agree my thesis represented by quotes from the book. I will tackle number 3 for this take home midterm. Social Darwinist and terms Jack London writing technique influence his readers to consider Social Darwinist has an outlook on life. Merriam Webster's explain Social Darwinist "to study of the human society, specifically a theory I human sociology that individuals or groups achieve advantages over others as the result of genetic or biological superiority. In class my classmates interpret it as "the survival of the fittest". I agree with them, but I feel that you have to learn and gain from your mistakes.
For example how could the strong survive without concurring adversity? London expresses it as, "And not only did he learn by experience, but instincts long dead becomes alive again. The domesticated generations fell from him. In vague ways he remembered back to the youth of the breed (page 40)". Also I will define inference and Critical thinking simply because I'm going to us them as reference for my midterm paper. Critical Thinking is defined as the mental process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information to reach an answer or conclusion.
Then Inference is the reasoning involved in drawing a conclusion or making a logical judgment on the basis of circumstantial evidence and prior conclusions rather than on the basis of direct observation. These two definitions came from my online source. Finally a formalist criticism emphasizes the work as an independent creation, a self-contained unity, something to be studied in itself, not as part of some large context (Barnet, Bur to, Cain, and Stubbs 581). For example to view the author's life or a historical period would not be considered a formalist criticism. Technique I us to base the true agenda From the two techniques given Reading: Inference and Critical thinking plus writing: explication and analysis.
I used the reading: inference and critical thinking as a reference. From my reference I was able to conclude that the agenda for The Call of the Wild is one will continue to learn and be taught despite the circumstance their in. Quotes to argue my thesis believe that The Call of the Wild is one of the best books written, because it educate the readers that throughout life you will continue to learn and be thought. Throughout the novel, The Call of the Wild, the reader grows with buck as he transform from a common laid back house dog to a primordial beast. When buck touch down in Yukon, he began to convert his mind mentality to the survival of the fittest, with 'fittest' described as the one who learns the quickest. On pages 16 and 17 I believed this is where buck begin to learn about "fittest" hear are some quotes that come to mind"; You " ve learned your place, and I know mine.
Be a good dog and all 'll go well and the goose hang high. Be a bad dog, and I'll while the stuff in' out you. Understand?" (London 16) "That club was a revelation. It was his introduction to the reign of primitive low, and he met the introduction halfway (London 16)". The lesson was driven home to buck: a man with a club was a law giver, a mister to obey, though not necessarily conciliated (London 17)". This where the first lesson Buck learned and was taught.
Buck understood these new laws and adapt then into his everyday life". Not that Buck reasoned it out. He was fit, that was all, and unconsciously he accommodated himself to the new mode of life (London 38)". Finally, "there is an ecstasy that marks the summit of life, and beyond which life cannot rise. And such is the paradox of living, this ecstasy comes when one is most alive, and it comes as complete forgetfulness of living, comes to the artist, caught up and out of himself in a sheet of flame; it comes to the soldier, war-mad on a stricken field and refusing quarter; and it comes to Buck, leading the Pack, sounding the old wolf cry, straining after the food that was alive and that fled swiftly before him through the moonlight (London 62)". Conclusion base my paper from a Formalist critic.
I used the reading technique: Inference and critical thinking to determine the "true" agenda for The Call of the Wild. In this paper I should have explain why I believe that The Call of the Wild is one of the best books written, because it educate the readers that throughout life you will continue to learn and be thought. Also briefly explain Social Darwinist and the terms, technique used to base the true agenda, and agree my thesis represented by quotes from the book.