Approach Of Deconstruction In Architecture example essay topic

Deconstruction is first developed by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida. The definition for deconstruction is not easy to understand, and Derrida and his interpreters actually intend it to be difficult. It was first meant a method of interpretation and analysis of a text or a speech. He introduced the concept of deconstruction in connection with his linguistic philosophy and. When deconstruct a text or a speech, it is to draw out conflicting logic's of sense and implication, with the object of showing that the text never exactly means what it ways or says what it means. Though, it has been applied not only to text but also to the visual arts and architecture.

The approach of deconstruction in architecture is to get architects to think of things in a new way, to view architecture in bits and pieces. Also to develop buildings which show how differently from traditional architectural conventions buildings can be built without loosing their utility and still complying with the fundamental laws of physics. Especially in 1988, when deconstruction was first promoted in architecture. Different architects of different places seemed to be placing buildings and bits of buildings at odd angles so that they clashed and even penetrated each other. The geometry in these architectures had been set up, but has at least one overlaid and clashed with the other. Also, there are many different kinds of clashes such as: clashes in historic and modern, clashes in plan, clashes in section or elevation, clashes in three dimensions, clashes in grids and clashes in angles.

Deconstructionist architecture must start from deconstruct the construction at first, with a name indicates its schemes, its intuition and its concepts, or its rhetoric. Deconstruction also contains an insight of fundamental importance for the historian's conception of what he or she is doing. It uses theory to understand history, and history to understand the theory to construct a more perceptive view of the cultural and social. As deconstructs a structure, it strictly meets the terms of architectural construction and the philosophical construction of the concept of architecture. Therefore, deconstruction is understood to be un-problematically architectural, as it combines with the idea of the system in philosophy, and theory, also the practice and logic in architecture. Moreover, deconstruction can show that representations of architecture are not and cannot be adequate to the task of representation, but have nothing to say about the social work that representation can and does do.

Deconstruction can become the basis for a new construction. It is when the architects think that the design of societies! | buildings should resemble societies present stated. For example today's society is chaotic, so the architecture should be chaotic too. Deconstruction is a kind of the postmodern design, deconstruction and postmodern design seems to relate to each other. However, there is always a twist in the structure and the deconstructionist architectures can be crazy like. Although modern architecture had not allowed the expression of conflicts of function between different spaces, but in deconstruction, it allows intersecting angled beams and clash of different functionless spaces.

When different spaces intersecting one another in an irregular way, it is an attempt to reveal the character of each and every space and the occasional conflict and coincidence in the relationship between them. Derrida insisted that despite appearances of the architecture, deconstruction is not an architectural metaphor or any type of metaphor; as it takes place within a specific philosophical practice and philosophical thinking. Although deconstruction is a new movement in the 1980's, it is not a style but theory based. Also, architectural thinking can only be deconstructive when it is an attempt to visualize, which established the authority of the architectural concatenation in philosophy.

One of the driving forces in the architecture of deconstruction is the intention of the architect to emphasize the element of time in spatial compositions. One way this is done is through compositions that employ simultaneous system overlaid or clashed in a singular space. It is also accomplished by using forms that are dynamic rather than static. As modern architecture had not allowed the expression of contradictions, but in deconstructive buildings, there are different spaces intersecting one another in irregular ways. This is an attempt to reveal the character of each and every space, and the relationship in between of the occasional conflict and coincidence. There are at least three references to characterize deconstructionist architecture: !

P First, it will be seen how such work tends to juxtapose visual and textual elements, producing not so much a post-modernist collage of randomly associated styles and techniques as a critical, interrogative exchange between them; ! P Second, this will have effect of engaging the viewer or reader in an active decoding of the social constraints that are often concealed behind talk to aesthetic autonomy or form; and! P Thirdly, that deconstruction maintains the kind of double-edged relation to modernist themes and techniques that enables such analysis to be carried forward without losing its point through the sheer multiplicity of styles on offer. An example would be the Hague Social Housing by Peter Eisenman. This project was conceived in order to explore innovative ideas in the living space in the city; it displays every conceivable housing typology from an isolated single-family house to a multi-apartment tower. Eisenman has explored a new concept by generating a central public circulation space as a sequential progression of three-dimensional dislocations of the same absent space.

The form of The Hague is apparently illogical clashes of grids and of the three dimensional space, and the erosion splits the building into two independent living blocks. It also uses diagonal lines to destroy the perfect right-angled geometries of the modern movement. Some of the windows have turned at angles and rough materials are used in the structure. The Hague Social Housing has been distorted by additions and subtractions of forms. The building is the receptacle of the imprints of the passage of this conceptual eroding of voids.

The left is the trace frames of the new gaps, the narratives of the stationary that overlap the voids. Therefore, going home becomes a new experience, one of a recollection of events, a sequential reading of traces of the dislocation of time and place. Computer-aided design is important in deconstruction; it allows the architects in planning, and to solve problems such as proportion and scale. Also, with the computer simulation, it uses to utilize the design phase to examine and optimize the energy concept like natural lighting, warmth and ventilation. Deconstructionist architectures can be identified when the meaning of any work is un-decidable, or when the meaning of the work or architecture represses un-decidability. As Derrida has argued, if the architecture had been completed, there would be no architecture.

Only the incompletion of the architecture makes it possible for architecture as well as the multitude of languages to have a history. If deconstructionist architectures look unfinished, this is exactly the way they are supposed to look because according to the deconstructive philosophy, no building is an isolated and self-contained machine. It can never be finished in the sense that no statement can ever fully encapsulate the reality to which it refers. A structure can never adequately represent the referent system it is supposed to represent. In conclusion, architecture has nothing to do with various styles, but instead, it is the architectural idea that is the foundation of architecture to represent the nature of architecture. The fundamental idea of architecture consists of primary forms such as cubes, cones, cylinders, and cet era.

Although, deconstructionist architecture made clear to the observer that the architecture is an art and not just an engineering discipline, and it is a representation of a material that represent of abstract data. Although deconstructionist architecture does not succeed in the nature of architecture, however, deconstruction is philosophical in the sense that it deploys a distinctive mode of argument in raising certain problem about knowledge, meaning and representation. My opinion on deconstruction is that some of the architecture can be really beautiful but others can be strange.

Bibliography

P C. Andreas, Reconstruction Deconstruction, Academy Group LTD, 1989, USA! P H.
Kevin, Trespass of the sign: deconstruction, theology and philosophy, ! P N. Christopher & B. Andrew, What is Deconstruction, Academy Editions LTD, 1996, USA! P S.
Bronwyn, Contemporary Discourse in Interior Architecture and Design! V Unit Reader 2002, Monash University, 2002, Melbourne! P W.
Mark, The Architecture of Deconstruction, MIT Press, 1993, USA.