Article About Internet Censoring Software example essay topic

Jeremy YorwarthENL 111 5.3 December 9, 2000 Censorship of the Internet 'We should demand that all public schools and libraries install and configure Internet Filters. ' This statement shows how Jeffery Pollock, a candidate for the 3rd Congressional District seat in Oregon, views the Internet. Unfortunately for him, the one thing that he ranted and raved about was the one thing that gave him an unfair disadvantage in the in the upcoming elections. (Blind Ballots) Cyber Patrol, One of the leading Internet censoring companies and is used in over 17,000 schools in the Untied States, actually blocked his website from potential voters. Needless to say, when Mr. Pollock discovered this injustice, some of his views about Internet censorship changed.

But Mr. Pollock isn't the only candidate whose chances of winning are diminished because of Internet censoring software. In Fact, The two leading school censoring products Cyber Patrol and N 2 H 2 Bess, used in over 40,000 schools and school districts across the nation, also blocked millions of people from viewing Pat Casey's website, Mark Greene's website, and over 37 other candidates' campaign homepages. Most of the millions of people blocked from these campaign pages are also blocked from many pages dealing with gynecology, sex education, racism, gambling, ethics, teen parenting, and the list continues. (Blind Ballots) Certainly in some situations, censorship of some material can be justified. For Yorwarth 2 example, A first grade teacher takes her students to the computer lab for a day, the teacher wouldn't want the kids getting hounded by hundreds of porn sites, but would it really make a difference if a six year old kid was using a censored internet or uncensored internet? A kid is not going to be looking for anything that has to do with porn or anything remotely close to getting blocked.

If a child goes to Yahoo and searches for cartoons or the mighty morphin' power rangers, they will not get pummeled by so called "bad" internet sites, so there will not be anything to censor anyway. Middle School and High School students across the nation are often required to do research papers and the Internet is a logical source because it contains so much useful information. It would be much harder for a senior in high school to find information about sex education or sexually transmitted diseases on a censored internet because the current software simply can't tell the difference between the sites with good information and the garbage sites, so the program just blocks it all. It would be beneficial to censor the Internet in schools if the censoring program actually worked; sadly none of the programs are good enough and actually do more harm than good. If there is a student who wants to find porn on the Internet, he will because the censoring programs suck. Not only will he find the porn, but also he will not get into trouble for it because since it is censored only good sites that are approved are available.

When I was in high school, I did an Ecology paper and the censoring program actually blocked out informational internet pages about black bears and bullfrogs, simply because it contained information about mating habits, which is ridiculous. Yorwarth 3 Many highly respectable organizations are completely against Internet censorship. One such organization is the American Library Association or ALA. The ALA is against any type of censoring software or programs in any of their affiliations across the nation. In Fact, a line in the ALA code of ethics specifically states, "We uphold the principles of intellectual Freedom and resist all efforts to censor library resources". (Weckert 44) There is no mistaking that the ALA is against censorship.

Another highly regarded source is The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, In this Article 19 states "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and import information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers". (Weckert 45) How would you feel if you were Lieutenant Bobby Ross, a veteran who took some time to create an essay called What Is Memorial Day? In his essay, he makes a patriotic speech to the younger generations and explains why Memorial Day is such an important day. (Ross) Ironically, almost half of the school students whom this was created for are restricted from ever viewing it. In a related case, How a Bill Becomes a Law was made to introduce students to the Legislative process. It's too bad that many students are forbidden to see it, not because it has porn on it or because of any other unsuitable material, but because the censoring programs of today are terrible (How a Bill).

Yet in 1999, the same students that were restricted to What is Memorial Day? and How a Bill Becomes a Law could view Logan's Pic Page and Page of Pink without a problem. Lets just say that the material on these pages is not suitable for anyone under twenty-one. These pages were Yorwarth 4 shut down, but new ones open up every day and slip right past the Internet Filters. (Linthicum) Most of the controversy over Internet Censoring Software is not based on the blocking of a chicken breast recipe, breast cancer pages, Anne Sexton, or Super bowl.

These sites are not deliberately blocked and are accidentally blocked by blocking software programs that search internet pages for certain keywords, as nearly all of them do. However, Most of the controversy is on sites that are blocked not accidentally but blocked deliberately. These are internet sites that are part of a large file that is just lists of so-called bad internet sites. These lists come with the censoring software and stop the user from viewing the information regardless of the actual information on the page. One of the most absurd cases was when a writer for TIME Magazine decided to write an article about Internet Censoring software. In the article, TIME Magazine showed reasons against internet censoring software and in particular flaws of CYBERsitter.

CYBERsitter has blocked many useful websites and TIME Magazine thought that the world should know that not all blocked website were harmful. One day one of the employees for CYBERsitter read this article and showed it to the president of CYBERsitter. Instead of dismissing it, the company decided to get revenge against TIME Magazine. CYBERsitter not only blocked the article, but they blocked the entire TIME website.

They entered web into the CYBERsitter blacklist and stopped all homes and schools that used CYBERsitter internet censoring program from viewing the TIME website. (Bennett) It doesn't take a supreme court to figure out that the actions taken by CYBERsitter were Yorwarth 5 wrong. These are the first few lines from the return article that TIME Magazine created to oppose CYBERsitter's actions. Web filtering products designed to keep Junior from visiting big tits. com may be a cure worse than the disease, Time reported this week (with some help from Netly's intrepid Washington correspondent).

The article pointed out CyberSitter's propensity to block sites like the National Organization for Women and newsgroups devoted to discussions of gay politics. Now it might be time to add pathfinder. com to that list. A Marquette University librarian -- working as part of a team of researchers cataloging the effects of filtering software -- reports CyberSitter barred her from reading the Time article on the web. Apparently CyberSitter had, once again, blocked the web sites of its critics. (Lindsay) The bizarre and illegal actions taken by this Internet censoring company, may seem like an isolated or rare case, however there have been hundreds of reports by legitimate Internet sites that were intentionally blocked even though they contain absolutely 0% "bad material" (Bennett).

Unfortunately for the Internet censoring companies, this just shows the public and their main customers just how childish they can become. When all is said and done and the smoke clears from the battle, which side will you be standing on? Will you be with the 1st amendment and the ALA or will you be with the money-hungry censoring corporations? One thing for sure is that if I am working on a project, I will not sit at a censored computer with incomplete resources, while another Yorwarth 6 person has a greater advantage using a computer with a complete database of information.

Bibliography

Bennett (2000) Blocking Software FAQ.
Retrieved November 28, 2000 from the World Wide Web.
web Ross (2000) What is Memorial Day? Retrieved November 25, 2000 from the World Wide Web: web is memorial day.
htm Greg Lindsay (1997) Cybersitter Decides To Take A Time Out.
Retrieved November 28, 2000 from the World Wide Web: web Bennett and M carthy, Jamie (2000) Blind Ballots.
Retrieved November 26, 2000 from the World Wide Web: web David S.
1999) "Site Building".
Computer Shopper Nov. 1999: 246.
Unknown (1999).
Censorship of the Internet. Retrieved November 26, 2000 from the World Wide Web: web (1999).
How a Bill Becomes a Law. Retrieved November 25, 2000 from the World Wide Web: web John and Adney, Douglas (1997) Computer and Information Ethics Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.