Audience A Closer Feeling To The Play example essay topic
I thought it was amazing that the play interacted so well with only one backdrop. Catherine was excellent in her role, acting back and fourth between anger, depression, love and hate. She has very good qualities about her and looked as if she had been acting for a long time. I had a feeling that the profanity did not belong in the play, I felt like it was thrown in just for the cause. It looked strange when the actors would cuss, it did not look natural as if they almost had to force it out of their mouths. The character Hal had a lot of humor about him.
He was entertaining to watch and funny to listen to. I thought he played his part well, but was not as good as Robert. Robert, in my opinion, was the best actor on the stage. He was very elegant in the way he presented himself, and had such a power when he delivered his role. Robert was the best actor, but I could not stand Claire. I didn't think she was good and was a very annoying character.
Her voice was very unwelcome when she spoke. Every time that it was her turn to talk I would cringe in my seat. I may be mistaken in my judgment due to the fact that I am not a theater major, but this is my feeling on her skills. Many of the actors were believable, but I did not feel that Robert made his impairment look convincing.
Most of the actor could not perform their roles without the help of their counterparts. Many scenes, such as Robert and Catherine arguing, would not have conducted themselves well without the help of both actors. All the actors acted professional and presented themselves properly. I was shocked with the kissing scenes. There was a lot of intimacy and touching throughout the performance. The actors must be very close off the set as they are on it.
I thought that there was an idea about the production, but it was the viewer's job to determine what it was. The director of the production never told the audience what was happening during the movie, but after looking at the scene it was easy to see where the story was going. I think that the kissing played a big part in the play. It stuck out the most and was a huge factor in determining where the play was going.
I thought that the play ran smoothly. All the elements seemed to run together. The props helped a lot in the production. I really enjoyed the opening scene, with the Champaign bottle. It was enjoyable to know that the actors were not used to drinking and that not everything goes as planned. An example of everything not going as planned was when Catherine spilled the Champaign on the floor and spilled it on herself, I think that mishaps like those result in a good play, which makes it, look natural.
For the type of play, the scenery was sufficient. I liked how the inside of the house was visible from the outside; I felt it gave the audience a closer feeling to the play itself. The whole play took place "outside of the house" which was fantastic for the dialogue and acting. The colors of the house started to become very plain. I think that in the future, the house should have interesting designs that capture the audience's eye. But Proof was a sort of dark play.
Catherine was always mad at something, mad her father died, mad her sister wanted to take her to New York, mad she had no boy friend, and mad that she thought she was becoming like her father. That is one of the reasons for the solid color of green. The costumes set the mood for the scenes. The play involves three young adults and an elderly man. The costumes fit the personalities of each character perfectly.
Claire was always in business suits, Catherine's clothes represented her being lost in life, Hal was a college grad and a nerd, and Robert was a matured man who was losing his mind. Every costume helped the audience understand the importance of the role and analyze the scenes importance. I thought that the lighting gave the audience a feel for the scene. The lights were bright during the happy parts of the play. During the flashbacks to when Catherine was heading off to college, she looked so happy and the light would reflect off the clothes that she wore giving a more comforting look. The lighting was also changed when the moods of the characters changed.
When Catherine and her father were fighting, the light tone was very different then the opening of the play when her father was dead. A lot of the lighting was unrealistic, due to the setup of the stage, but I think that the lighting crew realized this and tried to work around it. The lighting followed the actors, which made their faces visible to the audience. The only time that I was unable to fully see a character was when his back was turned to the audience, other than that everything was fine. The text was no Shakespeare, but it did a fine job when getting the idea of the play out to the audience. Much of the text was told by the tone of voice that each actor possessed.
When a character was yelling or talking regular, the text was put into different perspective, it gave the dialogue more meaning. After finding out the major role each character was in charge of, I could put the whole play into perspective. The lines made more sense when I knew the personalities that each character possessed. I am sorry to say that I did not identify myself with any of the characters, Robert was crazy, Catherine was unstable and confused, Hal was a nerd who likes math, my worse subject, and Claire seems so upper class like she is better then everyone around her.
But I thought the theater department earned my dollar, the play was good.