Average Prison Sentence example essay topic
Admittedly, this was not the full extent of Workings punishment: she received a separate five-year jail sentence for using a gun in the commission of a crime. Yet the sentencing judge, U.S. District Judge Jack Tanner, openly stated that he would have suspended that sentence too if it had not been mandatory under federal law. His reasoning was that Working had been depressed and fearful that her estranged husband would take away her children in a custody battle. In April, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit overturned the sentence, ruling that Tanner had improperly departed from the sentencing guidelines without adequate reasons.
The case was sent back to the lower court and reassigned to another judge. The 9th Circuits ruling made an unusual explicit reference to gender bias, stating that Tanner would be unlikely to set aside considerations of Workings sex. Despite the eventual outcome, many would say the Working case illustrates a pervasive pattern in the criminal justice system of gender-based leniency toward women. This has become an article of faith among men's rights activists. In his 1993 book The Myth of Male Power, Warren Farrell asserts, twelve distinct female-only defenses allow a woman who commits a premeditated murder to have the charges dropped or significantly reduced. This sensational claim is seriously exaggerated.
Of the 12 items listed by Farrell, only three insanity pleas based on premenstrual syndrome or postpartum depression and self-defense or insanity pleas based on battered woman syndrome can accurately be called female-only defenses. However, even with such a type of defense used there is little chance to succeed. The rest of Farrell list consists of factors that contribute to more-lenient treatment of women, from stereotypes that make women less likely suspects to protective husbands standing by wives who have committed violence against them or their children. Nonetheless, the pattern does exist. Two Justice Department studies in the late 1980's found that male offenders were more than twice as likely as women charged with similar crimes to be incarcerated for more than a year, and that even allowing for other factors, such as prior convictions, women were more likely to receive a light sentence.
The disparities are especially striking in family murders, the primary form of homicide committed by women. A Justice Department study of domestic homicides in 1988 found that 94 percent of men who were convicted of (or p led guilty to) killing their spouses received prison sentences, but only 81 percent of the women did. The average sentence was 16.5 years for husbands and a mere six years for wives. Some of the difference was because more of the women had been provoked that is, assaulted or threatened prior to the killing. However, when there had been no provocation, the average prison sentence was seven years for killer wives and 17 years for killer husbands. Beyond the numbers, the contrast between the treatment of male and female defendants can be shocking in individual cases.
In 1995, Texas executed Jesse Dewayne Jacobs for a murder that, by the prosecutors admission, was committed by his sister, Bobbie Jean Hogan. Hogan -- who had gotten Jacobs to help her abduct her boyfriends ex-wife and had actually pulled the trigger -- served 10 years in prison.