Beliefs Of A God example essay topic

God is an entity that exists everywhere in any way, shape, or form, as is the concept of a god that so many people have set in stone their beliefs; and is a false belief that can not possibly be true. Personification takes a role in the disproof of a god, signaling that God is merely a word. Also, the very definition of morals, which is a condemning factor that 'god' is based off of, blows the fish out of the water. So then, to a perfect being of all loving and compassionate understanding, option, or choice, refers to the many choices God has made; thus proving that to a being who has created all choices is a contradiction within itself.

There are many factors that come into play in the proving of the falsities of a god or gods which can include the wonderful world of science. Existentialism is a theory which can be proven; contradicting all beliefs of a god or gods that could potentially skew humanity's entire mindset in this 21st century. Due to the fact that humanity's mindset has been skewed, it is possible that god is merely personification. According to James Hynes's typed sheet of a few figurative language definitions, personification is: ... human-like qualities attributed to objects, animal, or ideas. Ideas, animals, or things which are personified can also be symbols. The Statue of Liberty is a prime example of personification and is rich in symbolism at the same time (English II Class Notes).

Much like the Statue of Liberty, in that it is the personification of freedom, the concept of God is the personification of an idea of a 'good' moral belief system, and an unseen creature of love and hope. Well, people may ask what's wrong with believing in God anyways, contrary to the points which have been grounded. The effect may be a wrongful impression, interpretation or perception of the world and environmental status. If one were to go around believing in God and that he's going to save us, only if one was good and follows his beliefs, then other people might sprout on the opposite 'side,' claiming that they " re in the name of someone named Satan.

Well, the people who oppose God will begin to plague the earth. They will plague the earth and its inhabitants simply because they hate God because Satan hates God. This means that sides of good and evil are merely opinions and both have the same difference. To interfere with these concepts, one could also state that good is referred to as, for example, giving the homeless a home, reaching out to a friend, and spreading the message of peace. One might also state that good can also be the purity of such religions as Christianity and Catholicism, deeming that in purifying each religious sect, you must also purify the people; which is what the Inquisition of Spain was about. As a result of trying to purify the people, the Church, and religion, many people did find it in their power to accuse many innocent people that have been enemies of their feuding families.

The lives that were spared in those dark times were very few, as one could imagine, and also one could imagine that you could barely walk the streets without seeing your sister's head on a pike, or your fathers ligaments torn from their appendages and joints. It would seem to have been a horrible time. As stated before, a misinterpretation, a misimpression and a misperception can become the effect of a belief in God or a god; who stands for the very quality of morality and, according to the peoples of today, destiny. The very definition of the word destiny means to me the very opposite of free will, because without free will, life would seem very meaningless. Actually, destiny is a word that I use, but do not believe in. Morality is another term that ties hand in hand with beliefs.

Morality, by definition is "the relation of conformity or nonconformity to the moral standard or rule; quality of an intention, a character, an action, a principle, or a sentiment, when tried by the standard of right" (web). There are some flaws with the term morality, being that the "standard of right" is merely an opinion, and not everyone's "sentiments" and "principles" and "intentions" are the same, merely because we have free will. If a man, born with the thoughtful intention of good - in this case, sadism - carries out his morals, and if "God [denoted] the light... as good", then separated light from darkness; then it does seem to me we have come across a contradiction here (Web Bible Net Genesis 6). Then I ask, why does a person believe in God?

Is it because of his actual moral belief system? If so, I ask, then to please reconsider where your mindset is. Also, if "God is perfectly loving and omnipotent... God does not directly show himself as he used... [and] Because God does not show himself as he used to, many souls will be lost [to the devil, or Satan]", then we see a major contradiction here (Hollinger, For the Nonexistence of God). Since many souls would be lost because of God's mis comprehension of his ever-present, ever-invisible 'being,' God could not be all loving. Also, if God did love all of earth's inhabitants, including the non-living objects - assuming he does exist in this case - then he would have destroyed this Satan for Earth a long time ago.

Consider delving into non biased scientific resources in order to further man's understanding of the actual nonexistence of God, and also consider looking at the choices God had to make. Since God is merely personification and is disproved by science based textbooks, also the philosophy of option can be considered to a being that is perfect. "What does the word 'option' mean to a being who created all options?" (Freewill Argument for Nonexistence of God, Bar ker) Ponder this question for a moment, and think about what this could mean. To me, it means that what the Bible says, and what this question implies are two totally different ideas.

The Bible, through my interpretation, has stated that God has had many options in choosing what should be done with our destinies, and God did create all options, as he created everything and knows all - according to popular belief. Now, the sentence previous to this one contains a major contradiction, simply because if God did have options, he would have chosen the best one to best befit our lifestyles, and also would know our destinies. So then why have we gone through regression in past civilizations, namely the Middle Ages of England? Also, is it possible to regress while still living in the present?

Then, one might also wonder as to what is God's desire for humanity in the end and how we shall end up. The thing is, we " re never going to know, simply because one can only literally live in the present. Also, saying that God has a desire "implies a lack, and a perfect being should lack nothing" (Barker, Freewill Argument for the Nonexistence of God). Why do we all still even strongly believe in the idea of a god?

God is nothing more than "personification" (Hynes, Figurative Language). So, to reiterate, God can not be a truth due to these facts as of so far yet stated about personification and previous facts also stated. In order to completely understand this concept of existentialism, one should consider the laws of science. Let's just say that Joes is out shopping, and it's for a party with many guests waiting at home. He bundles up all of this food, but then he realizes, that he is strapped for cash. He then, embarrassingly, puts away about half of the groceries and pays for them, leaving the store in a hurried, calm and awkward rush.

As he is loading the groceries in his trunk, he realizes that it's not going to all fit because, somewhere between the store and his car (25 feet), his groceries doubled. In the same way does this not sound absurd and physically impossible; as do many of the other miracles that have been claimed to have happened in the past with historical figures. So why is humanity, nowadays, hesitant to believe a miracle has occurred, but almost instantly we deem the past historical records as true, even if it is a one second hesitation? This is simply because in the day and age of which is currently being lived, mankind is more open to proper and scientific logic.

"Miracles by definition are violations of laws of nature that can only be explained by God's intervention" (Martin, The Transcendental Argument for the Nonexistence of God). If a hot dog were to appear in front of a human right now because he was so hungry and asked God for one - in my opinion, talking to yourself -, he would react in a confused, scared, disbelieving sort of way. It is not possible, in any form of science, including Quantum Mechanics, for a hot dog to appear out of the air. Also, when one does ask for a miracle, they never really do take place.

Now, one could argue that God doesn't go around performing miracles for anyone who asks; otherwise the world would be corrupt. Then what about the people who have devoted themselves to God, and have never done anything wrong or 'against God?' Many of these people have wound up poor and died of early ages, or have been sacrificed in the name of God. Why doesn't God just save the people who have followed him? The Web Bible Net states the book of Genesis, and it begins, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth...

And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep... And God said, Let there be light: and there was light" (Chapter 1). If God could say something, and it comes about, why does he not say, "Let there be peace", and have peace reign over the earth? Well, some people might argue that the free will of every living creature would be affected. If that is the case, then why can the world not have peace, and also then in turn have control over our destinies to us? What makes science so logical is the fact that everything fits together so well in it and science has also been the basis of our civilizations for many millennia.

Human beings, as you can see, have been lied to all along by believing in a false idol and spreading the word of that idol, so therefore, existentialism is a theory which has already been proven in the laws of nature and science and logic. The very definition of personification can be a possible explanation of the nonexistence of god. Moral understanding and beliefs that we " ve come to adopt from the banality of God, also decides what is right and what is wrong. A being who has created all options needs not to decide the fate of the universe as he created it in all of its glory, or shame, so therefore, if this is true - which it is not - then we, today, lead meaningless lives.

Science has put the ideas and beliefs of religion to shame over the countless years that it has been discovered. Overall, existentialism is a perception that should be taken into account for its wonderful enlightenment on what appears to be incorrect or correct, and, as a final thought, god can not exist to the reasons stated; plus, there are many, many more theories out there that also disprove religion entirely, so I therefore say, the decision is yours.

Bibliography

Barker, Dan Freewill Argument for the Nonexistence of God 3 Dec. 2003.
Dictionary. com Lexico Publishing Group, LLC. 3 Dec. 2003.
Hollinger, Matt For the Nonexistence of God 3 Dec. 2003.
Hynes, James English II Class Notes Personification 2003 Martin, Michael The Transcendental Argument for the Nonexistence of God 3 Dec.
2003.