Believes In Social Darwinism example essay topic

785 words
Nature versus Nurture The idea of whether human behavior is determined by genetics or by environment is an ongoing debate. Biologists and social scientists have different views. The biologists believe that genes determine human behavior, and on the other hand social scientists believe that we are our own creation and we are free from the chains of biology. During a debate in the 1970's, someone mentioned the sex differences in chimpanzees.

During a PET scan, they found different areas of the brain lighting up between men and women. Thus, the question arises is it a gene factor or not? There were only two schools fifty years ago in America that studied animal behavior, of which they had different opinions about teaching animals to do things. For example, when a monkey is trained to press a lever, some say that is trial and error. B.F. Skinner quoted, "Pigeon, rat, monkey, which is which? It doesn't matter". In Europe there was a school that studied the naturalistic behavior.

There they would put an animal in it's own type of environment and see what would happen. Such as a spider building a web. It doesn't have to be taught, because it already knows how to do it. The school in Europe lets the nature take its course rather than training the animals.

The ethologists emphasized a phylogenetic descent rather than the processes of natural selection. In case you didn't know, ethologists study how animals behave in a laboratory or in the wild. The trait of aggression was a good sign to the ethologists. The argument for the trait of aggression is if animals kill one another in fights, then it " ll kill off the whole species.

Although it may be stating some truth in it, some animals may not fight because they know they " ll be harmed and will back away. Thus, not killing off the whole race. Since biologists and social scientists had been coming up with disagreeing theories, in 1975, Edward O. Wilson delivered the news that human behavior was ripe for the Darwinism perspective and that the social sciences should prepare themselves to work together with the biologists. He was not liked for that, and someone even poured water on his head in disagreement. Some say human behavior can be easily changed because it's learned, other changes are harder to make because it's who we are.

Ideologies caused communism, but it went under because an economic incentive structure was out of touch with the human nature. Instead of relying on social engineering, Nazi Germany, classified people into "superior" and "inferior" types. Social Darwinism, which is the idea that in a laissez-faire capitalist economy the strong will out last the weak. Whoever believes in social Darwinism believe that the poor people should not be aided in there struggle for existence so as not to upset the natural order.

To educate the public on genes and what they can do, they " re like seeds dropped onto the pavement: powerless to produce anything. There should be in the future at some point, a more accurate knowledge of the brain and how it works and how the social science department works. Sigmund Freud assumed that everything an individual does is linked somehow to their sexuality, and that feelings of sexuality are frequently directed at our parents. Then there was the disagreement made by Edward Westermarck. He believed that the relationship between mother and child would kill the sexual desire. He proposed this to try and prevent any type of inbreeding.

This is where you look at the primates and see how much they are like the human race. Usually when there is a top dog male and he breeds the female he runs the baby away once it's old enough to breed, just to prevent incest. Reading this article I was hoping to come across whether or not primates were somehow related to the human race. Although there was so much information on the subject it didn't answer the question of whether or not the genes are a factor or not.

I found out some different things, and hopefully they " ll be interesting to everyone else. In my perspective I think the genes have no factor in behavior. It's the environment that decides whether or not you " re going to be a calm or stressed out type of person. Parents just act a certain way, so the little ones follow in their foot steps.