Black British example essay topic

From the readings and comprehensive media research we can conclude that the problem of racism exists in urban areas as well as in countryside. The teaching of racial relations and ethnicity is now considered to be an important part of the central curriculum in a wide variety of social sciences and humanities subjects. We come to a place in time when the issue should be resolved in a kind manner. The United States of America has, from the pre-colonial period, been viewed as an asylum for those people that are seeking a new starting point in life. For example, the greatest portion of those who arrived on the Mayflower came to find a place to gain religious freedom and worship according to their choice. Captain John Smith helped to develop the colonies largely by selling to the British the idea of the New World as a land of free choice and opportunity.

This was the beginning of the Great American Dream idea, which was directly aimed to immigrants from cultures worldwide for centuries. Prior to Smith's bringing settlers into this new land, explorers from other countries had found this continent as well. After the colonial settlements begun by Smith, William Bradford, and other prominent adventurers, this land of opportunity was also presented to mass as a melting pot, a phrase first used by Michel-Guillaume Jean de Creve Coeur in his Letters from an American Farmer that he wrote during the American Revolutionary Era. These two ideas: the melting pot and the Great American Dream have been building hope for the nation.

More and more immigrants from many nations came to America. The New Colossus, the poem written at the base of the Statue of Liberty, a figure holding out the promise of freedom and opportunity to millions of immigrants, welcomes them: Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-toast to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door! Nowadays the situation changed significantly.

Now let us look at the issue from a British prospective. For example we can take one of the prominent books by Paul Gilroy, who is a leading British cultural theorist and a professor of Sociology and African American studies at Yale University. He is an extremely well known figure in cultural studies. The book is called There aint no black in the union jack.

Gilroy's publications are highly controversial based on peoples reaction to this one. In the book he explained what it means to be black in late twentieth-century Great Britain. According to a modern report, posted in a local newspaper, the term British has racial connotations and there is no chance it is going to serve longer as a description of the UKs multicultural society. The overall outcome of the issue is that the UK should be formally recognized as a multicultural society whose history needs to be revised, rethought or jettisoned taking into account the criticism from Conservative MPs who said it was a confrontation to the native British who needed to stand up for themselves. But Labor ministers have promised to study its findings very carefully and are likely welcome it with greetings. The Runnymede Trust-sponsored Commission into the Future of Multi-ethnic Britain whose report is planned to be input shortly, also suggests that the time to review the privileged position of the Anglican church in public life has come and it is necessary approve the boost of the number of black and Asian faces in parliament.

But it is a short section on the future of Britishness in the 400-page report that has highlighted most controversy. The report of the commission, chaired by Lord Parekh, who is a Labor peer and political scientist, says devolution, the Good Friday agreement and globalization have determined the notion of Britishness. It states a rejection to Englishness as to an alternative: To be English, as the term is in practice used, is to be white. Britishness is not ideal, but at least it appears acceptable, particularly when suitably qualified - Black British, Indian British, and British Muslim and so on. However, there is one core and so far unavoidable barrier.

Britishness, as much as Englishness, is rather largely unspoken issue for the racial connotations. There is no place where whiteness features as an explicit condition of being British, but it is widely understood that Englishness, and therefore by extension Britishness has racial code. There ain't no black in the union jack, quotes the report, which says there is an assumption taken for granted that whiteness and Britishness go together similarly to roast beef and Yorkshire pudding. The absence in the national curriculum of a rewritten history of Britain as an imperial force including dominance in Ireland, Africa, the Caribbean and Asia, is proving to be an undesirable disaster, states the report. Its argument includes that the racial and cultural differences have been symbolically written out of the national story.

This multi sided report also calls for the establishment of a human rights commission, for action on discriminatory police stop and search policies and for the not supporting of the voucher system for asylum seekers. It states that it is unconditionally necessary to review the connections between church and state. This would help to figure out the issue about how other religions are discriminated against in customs related to civic religion, for instance daily prayers at Westminster and various religious ceremonies, including memorial events; the law of blasphemy; and the coronation oath. Gerald Howard, the Tory MP for Aldershot and a member of the Commons home affairs select committee, claimed the report represented social issues on a massive scale, and with a coincidence of engineering. It is an extraordinary affront to the 94% of the population which is not from ethnic minorities. The native British must stand up for themselves.

Lord Tebbit, the former Tory party chairman claimed that the greatest world conflicts appeared due to the existence of multicultural societies such as Yugoslavia, Sri Lanka and the former Soviet Union. Since no one is being held hostage in this kingdom and those who arrived recently have come to get away from their own countries and enjoy the benefits of this country, the best way forward is integration rather than separation into cultural ghetto es. C. Ellis and L. Shakespeare were barely cold before the investigators were pronouncing anti-social black culture to be the primary cause of the tragedy that took their lives. The saucer full of inner-city pathology, family breakdown, absence of parents and chaos was served up yet again, during the times that rap and hip-hop was singled out for special blame. This variation made a change to the actual standings of these multicultural essences. The developers of the commentaries were people who had been proudly discharged to consider race and racism seriously as a part of the country's political processes. The combination of unbelievable populism with ignorant opportunism was a telling one.

People should not be misled. Kim Howells and company were setting out to win the tough reputations that guarantee advancement, by showing that they care for British community worth nothing. They discharged the fact that the combination of race and crime has been a core reason to how this country managed its unwelcome immigrants throughout the 20th century. When they made a connection between alien settlement and excessive law breaking, the issue became something of a theme during the period of mass immigration. It is now a subject to rationalize the ongoing marginalization of the locally born grandchildren of those long before ages citizen-settlers. Speaking theoretically, those original immigrants were thought of as a law-abiding group.

Even when they started to be identified as a problem, their ethnically characterized criminal behavior involved a different range of offences from the ones with which they are associated these days. Their excessive Victorian respectability gave way to sex, drugs and reggae as a gulf between generations opened up. Pimping became mugging. Mugging turned to rioting as a consequence, and then to steaming, as an outcome.

Now we are told that selling crack cocaine and engaging in gunplay are the latest manifestations in the same familiar sequence. The conceptual descendants of Uncle Epochs past figures, that were occupying territories long before, became the outrageous staff for today's Birmingham's murderous gangs. The cast of characters evolves but there is consistency in the way that it is always crime that tells the British people what racial differences add up to.