Body Of Evidence In Your Paper example essay topic
The body is where you stop talking about what you " re going to do in your essay and you start actually doing it. In other words, the body is where you actually prove the assertion you made at the end of your introduction. Because the body is meant to do the heavy work of your essay, proving the point which you want to make, the language in your body will most likely be less engaging and more basic than the language in your introduction. Because the job of the body is to prove the thesis, it is both the easiest and the most dangerous part of your essay to write. It's easy because the body is the part of the essay where the words probably come to you easiest, but proving the thesis often turns out to be easier said than done.
Despite the fact that the total body of evidence may be somewhat inconclusive, it is your job to present the evidence in such a way that the body of evidence in your paper. leads your reader to believe your thesis to be true... First, you must do some research, trying to decide whether the bulk of the evidence available supports or contradicts your thesis. F ven if your essay deals only with one text, research is still essential, as research in this sense can mean anything from rereading the assigned text with an eye toward finding passages that support your claim to heading to the library, bringing an entire section of books to a table, and spending hours poring over them. If the bulk of evidence contradicts your thesis, you will, of course, want to reconsider your thesis. If all the evidence supports your reading, consider yourself lucky. It doesn't happen often, but when it does, the body of the essay is very easy to write.
When the bulk of the evidence supports your thesis, but there is some evidence contradicting it, you are in a position where you have to decide how to best present the supporting evidence, while dealing with the contradictory evidence in the best manner possible. Presenting the supporting evidence properly can be more difficult than it sounds. While it may sound simple to present evidence that agrees with the point that you are trying to make, there is almost always one order that is more effective than others. As a rule of thumb, you want to start with general principles and move toward specifics.
This holds true whether you are talking about contexts or novels themselves. It makes no sense to analyze a particular paragraph of a novel, for example, without placing that paragraph within the context of the rest of the novel and discussing the theme of the novel as a whole. It is also important that something be said well however, when dealing with two or more sources of roughly equal respect you want to make sure that you quote from the one source that says what you want it to say as clearly as possible. After all, a reader is not going to be impressed with an unintelligible quote. Bring up any conflicting evidence, tell your reader what someone who wanted to prove your thesis false might say about it, and let your reader know why you believe this point of view to be mistaken.
This is the most difficult part of the body of the paper, but it's a potential slam-dunk if you pull it off well. In one or two paragraphs, you raise and answer all the objections your professor is likely to have with your paper, leaving him or her with no option but to agree with your argument. The function of the conclusion is to remind the reader of what he or she has just read. Therefore, many successful conclusions start out by summarizing the argument in brief, brief being the operative word. The main points are fine here; avoid getting bogged down in details. From there; all that is left is some sort of concluding words.
Many writers like to make a tie to the introduction, especially if the introduction was clever or posed an interesting question. This strategy provides a nice sense of closure to the paper, and it gives the essay the feel of a unified whole. Another strategy is to close the paper with some ideas for future research. Every writer will find that he or she is more comfortable with one of these strategies than with the other, but neither strategy is preferable to the other in and of itself.