Book By Ron Kovic example essay topic

"Born on the Fourth of July " This book was incredible! In all truth this was the first book I have ever read cover to cover. The book, by Ron Kovic, as compared to the film, by Oliver Stone, had some impressive similarities. Both the book and the film did a great job of portraying Ron's childhood in Massapequa, Long Island.

From the little league games to playing war in the woods, leading charges and setting ambushes. This was especially well done in the movie, and exactly as I pictured them while reading the book. The time that he spent in Mexico was well defined in the book as well as in the film. While there were many similarities, what I feel is more important is to focus on the differences. There were countless small differences in the film as compared to the book, things such as shuffling the order in which chapters appeared in the film. For example, the beginning of the film took a different path than the beginning of the book.

In the book the first chapter set the tone for the rest of the book, describing the firefight and all that had gone wrong, Burning into your mind the thought of Ron Kovic lying on the ground bleeding, paralyzed, screaming for help and hearing people get shot all around him. The beginning of the film is a different story all together. It gives you hope, it lulls you into believing that this is a happy story, the kind where everything always works out in the end. It is not until after the entire buildup of the character, after you feel as if you know him, that you see this scene. The accidental killing of the civilians, the baby, the killing of the corporal, all these things happen before you find out that this soldier, this Marine, will come home paralyzed. The film makes it a point to show that there was an on-going, pseudo romance between Ron and Joan Marie.

The two of them kissing on his birthday, Ron running to the prom and showing up soaking wet, asking her for a dance. Finding her after the war and going to a protest with her. None of these things were anywhere in the book, in fact the book only mentioned her once, and in that mentioning Ron said that he was always too nervous to ask her for a date. The film completely leaves out Ron's marriage to Helen and his entire time in California. As for the reasons that Ron joined the Marine core there were some interesting and important differences. The film leads you to believe that the major reason that Ron joined the Marines was to be like his father, and that it was not only his duty to his country, but he wanted to go, in fact he was afraid that if he didn't enlist soon that he might miss the war entirely.

His parents were also a lot more concerned with him going in the film than they were in the book, especially his mother. While in the book Kovic makes it extremely clear that the most influential reason for him joining the Marines was because of the movies he saw as a boy, specifically the "Sands of Iwo Jima" and "To Hell and Back". He loved the way that Hollywood had glamorized the battles and the wars. When he thought of war that was what he thought about, John Wayne making a stand, taking out Japs and Nazi's with quick shots from the hip, all these things.

No innocent people were hurt, the hero always came home and that hero was loved and applauded when he got there. What Kovic found out was that these ideas were indeed influenced by Hollywood. The hero seldom comes home, and during these times he was not greeted by screaming fans but by "hippies" that protested his involvement. It also seemed that the film did not do a great job of portraying the deplorable conditions of the veteran's hospitals. Sure they showed some of the crude parts, but for the amount of the book that was dedicated to exposing what was going on in the VA hospitals the film did not seem to express it. From what I can tell Oliver Stone did an incredible job making this movie.

There were a few discrepancies between the book and the film, but on the whole I believe that the book was represented in the kind of way that would make Ron Kovic proud. The film itself had the kind of ending that left you wanting more. The way it just left him about to give an important speech made you wonder how he did, it made you wonder if he ever made up with his mother after their fight, it just left you wondering and I believe that is the way it should have ended. This book and film show an incredibly detailed account of what happens to history when Hollywood decides to make a movie out of it. In the book "History by Hollywood", written by Robert Brent Toplin, this book and film are actually mentioned. They are more there to incorporate some of Oliver Stone's work, but nonetheless they are in there.

So what does "History by Hollywood" tell us? Toplin effectively shows us what makes a good movie, and that a good movie for the box office is a whole different animal than a good movie for history. There was a focus on movies that dealt with real events and real people. You are shown how people like writers and producers can drastically "change history" in order to sell movie tickets. What is the one thing that every movie needs most of all? A love interest of course, this is something that does not always happen in history.

Case in point, "Born on the Fourth of July", the book mentioned a few female encounters, none of them love, but while watching the first half of the movie you feel that Ron Kovic is in love with Donna, a girl whom he has known since first grade. The book mentions a girl like this, once, but she has a different name, and Ron doesn't ever talk to her. Also, the entire prom scene seemed to be made up to aid in the progression of the love story, sounds like dramatic license or artistic freedom to me. There were quite a few other books mentioned in "History by Hollywood", but I felt that they were all portrayed and critiqued fairly.

I found it reassuring that Toplin was more concerned about educating the reader that movies were a good thing for history, while they are not always completely accurate, they do expand the minds of the people viewing them. If it was not for "Pearl Harbor" or "Saving Private Ryan", an entire generation could have forgotten about World War II. I would even go as far as to say that in 50 years there will be a movie such as "Pearl Harbor" about the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. Movies are an important part of our lives, they can be used as a teaching tool, or as a means of remembrance, but they will always be used. I just hope that the people watching them don't take them as fact, but take them as a basis to learn more about what really happened.