Booth About The Assassination Plot On Lincoln example essay topic
Murdering Mr. Lincoln by Charles Higham, presents the reader with a factual, in-depth look at the story behind the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. Higham leaves no stone unturned as he thoroughly explains the events that lead up to the death of Lincoln. Overall, the book is written in the eyes of the Confederacy and examples like this hymn give the reader reason to believe so. The first section that Higham explains is titled "The Mission".
This section gives a general overview of the mission of Confederate groups to try to remove President Lincoln from office. As the author explains, the Sons of Liberty were dedicated people, not just of the South, but also from Canada, who were willing to create a plan to take out the North. They did this is several ways, such as provoking war between England and the United States. Higham backs up his belief by providing vital information. "In the fall of 1861... Union adventurer Captain Charles F. Wilkes was sent to stage a boarding and seizure of the British ship Trent.
This was, in legal terms, and act of war since no ship could be boarded in that manner according to the peculiar maritime rules" (Pg 9). Higham also lays down a background of future players that will be involved in the Lincoln assassination. Officials such as Confederate President Jefferson Davis, his Secretary of State Judah P. Benjamin, and the Secretary of the Treasury Chris Memminger were planning to send a Confederate mission to British North America. The objective of the mission was to disrupt the loyal American states and enlist support for possible invasion, arson and murder to endanger the North. Higham's viewpoints of the beginning stages of the coup d'etat against Lincoln are backed up with precision accuracy. It is very easy to understand his style of writing, especially when he writes about some of the people involved in the situation.
Higham calls this next player to be the "most furious and dangerous anti-Lincoln ian". George Nicholas Sanders is now considered the man behind the plot to assassinate Abraham Lincoln as a part of the terrorist group The Knights of the Golden Circle. This group, along with the Sons of Liberty and the Young America movement founded by Sanders himself, single-mindedly wanted Lincoln destroyed. Sanders is directly linked to the Lincoln assassination because of his general hatred for Lincoln, calling for a destruction of crowned heads, and glorious bloodshed in the name of freedom. "A gigantic Brutus, armed... to bring death to tyrants... it beats the drumbeat of insurrection" (Pg 28). Higham gives distinct accounts of Sanders' life that were the making of a Lincoln assassination.
Higham talks about Sanders meeting with high ranking officials in the British and Confederates governments who were willing to lend support, but most importantly fund the destruction of the Union. Higham also lists the names of Sanders' right hand men who were specifically involved in some of the missions trying to kill Lincoln, like Giuseppe Mazzini, who earlier in his life had tried to assassinate Napoleon Bonaparte. Higham includes details of who Sanders met with, such as Jacob Thompson, who was the Secretary of the Interior for the Confederacy. In this section Higham also writes about the first attempts to assassinate Lincoln, the main attempt being when a bomb placed on board Lincoln's private railroad car. Higham uses chronological order and continually naming important figures throughout the story so as to help the reader remember the main events and characters. Probably the most interesting section in the book is called "The Name is Murder".
Here the reader finds out about the background of John Wilkes Booth, the eventual assassin of President Abraham Lincoln. While meeting other officials committed to the assassination of Lincoln, George Sanders met Booth, a fellow Son of Liberty, who to higham was the man that the Confederacy needed to kill Lincoln. Like most enemies of Lincoln, Booth was dismayed by the idea of potential emancipation and by dictatorial unionism in Washington. Higham also backs up this information by providing the reader with a line in a journal Booth had written himself after Lincoln's re-election for a second term. "We shall kill the damned old son-of-a-bitch Lincoln, he ought to have been dead and in hell long ago" (Pg 103). Higham also gives the reader a detailed account of exactly how Lincoln was assassinated, explaining the real story about how Booth was in position to kill the President in the first place.
We learn from a report given by the War Department of Richmond that Booth's original plan was to capture and assassinate President Lincoln. Booth was to capture Lincoln at a hospital where he was giving a speech, but at the last second the President changed his plans. Another plot of Booth's involved him and his partners, Lewis Pain and David Herold, who attended a Lincoln speech after his inauguration. The three were attempting to snipe him from a second story of the White House.
However, Pain hesitated and the three missed their opportunity. The successful attempt came when Booth found out about the attendance of President Lincoln at Ford's Theater on the night of April 14, 1865. There was a performance that night in which the Presidential party had planned to attend. Armed with a knife and a revolver, Booth was untouched as he made his way to the state box of Ford's Theater.
The President's bodyguard had stepped away from his post which gave Booth the perfect opportunity to make his move. Booth shot Lincoln once in the head and stabbed the bodyguard in order to make his escape. Higham barely mentions the actual assassination of President Lincoln, even though the title of the book calls for the description of the killing. This is a significant problem to have because the intensity of the book seems to gain momentum as each section is finished.
Higham doesn't even mention the actual killing. He describes Booth's journey to Ford's Theater and that the security guard had left to get a drink, but other than that it seems the author is just implying that Lincoln is already dead. This was the only problem I found with Higham's book. Higham gives specific examples of everything that he talks about. Anytime Higham introduces a person or letter, he gives full account of the background of the person and background of the letter.
As far as Higham's arguments about the plot against Lincoln, the information he uses is clearly supported because he is backed by a numerous list of sources. The only problem with some of his documentation was that some of it was superfluous, such as an artist's interpretation of what would eventually happen to the North when Lincoln died. However, some documentation is necessary, such as the pictures of all the significant players of the Lincoln assassination. Overall the book can be considered a legitimate source to the Lincoln assassination. Higham's arguments are convincing because all of his information seems to be backed by historians who have knowledge of the incident.
"The Aftermath of the Tragedy" is the section Higham considers the most influential. Here is where the reader finds new information that has not been discussed in the average history book. Here is where Higham instills a lasting impression on the reader of the entire situation. John Wilkes Booth, and most of his accomplices, were seized and sent to trial where they were all found guilty of murder. One of the interesting things about the story is that John Surratt, whose mother was hanged for the crime, managed to be at two places at once.
John Surratt was another Confederate supporter who conspired with Booth about the assassination plot on Lincoln. While a fugitive from the American justice system, Surratt escaped first to Canada, proceeded to Great Britain, then Rome, and after a brief detention there, to Alexandria, Egypt. This is just one of the conspiracies Higham talks about in his book. From start to finish, Higham thoroughly explains each stage that lead to the eventual assassination of President Abraham Lincoln. One of the reasons why Higham is so successful in his attempt tell the story is that he back his information and arguments up with detailed accounts of what actually happened. Higham style is informative and understandable.
Higham knowledge of the subject matter comes through in the book.