Branagh's Henry Doubts example essay topic

Benjamin W. Cheng Princeton University '00 HENRY V - KING HENRY'S DARKER SIDE The original text of William Shakespeare's Henry V seems to portray King Henry as a character too ideal to be realistic. Indeed, the chorus describes him as the "mirror of all Christian kings" whose actions epitomize justice and conscience (Henry V, ed. John Russell Brown [New York: Signet Classic, 1963], 2. Cho. 6). Throughout the play, Henry's words and actions illustrate his many virtues, virtually elevating him in our eyes to the status of a saint.

Despite the text's suggestion that he is a symbol of virtue, however, obviously not everyone agrees with such an ideal image of the king. For example, Kenneth Branagh, in his screen adaptation of Henry V, illuminates the protagonist in a completely different light. As Branagh himself recalls, he wanted to explore Henry's darker side, and to convey his "qualities of introspection, fear, doubt and anger". Instead of reinforcing the king's image as a saintly figure, Branagh's screenplay exposes him as a mere human vulnerable to feelings of insecurity, vengefulness, and guilt.

Using theatrical techniques such as flashbacks and ominous background music, Branagh depicts these darker and harsher qualities in our so-called "ideal" monarch. Almost from the very beginning of the film, we notice qualities in Henry very different from those we would expect after reading the play. In the original text, we imagine him as a clement and merciful king who is conscientious about preventing excessive "fall of blood" (1.2. 25). Indeed, we see him in Act I Scene ii agonizing over whether or not he may "with right and conscience" take over France (1.2. 96).

Moreover, Henry reveals a distaste for unnecessary bloods he through his reluctance to wage an unjust war in which soldiers would "drop their blood in approbation" (1.2. 19). In Act II Scene ii, Henry even impresses us with his magnanimity and mercy by releasing a man imprisoned for a minor offense. He thus gives us every reason to view him as an ideal monarch. Despite the king's virtuous image in the text, however, Branagh's screenplay portrays him as angry and vengeful, at times even bloodthirsty.

In the first act of the film, we see Henry planning his conquest of France to the accompaniment of deep and ominous cello tones. In a sinister half-whisper, Henry reveals his intent to "bend [France] to [his] awe", or "break it all to pieces" (1.2. 224-225). Needless to say, such menacing words are most unusual for a "conscientious" king who dislikes bloodshed. Although these lines are in the original text, the emphasis placed on them by Henry's tone of voice unveils a bloodthirsty side to the king the text alone does not suggest. Later in that same scene, the king further reveals his harsh nature by vowing to punish France for insulting him.

The way Henry virtually spits out his description of the French women who will be forever " [mocked] out of their dear husbands [and sons]" suggests a vengefulness we do not see in the text (1.2. 285). Similarly, in Act Scene, we learn of Henry's anger and aggression only because he screams (rather than merely states) his threats of "heady murder, spoil, and villainy" at an already submissive Governor of Har fleur (3.3. 32). Thus, although the text may portray Henry as clement, merciful, and conscientious, Branagh's acting definitely undermines this ideal image of the king.

The screenplay exposes not only Henry's angry and vengeful disposition, but also his insecurity and paranoia. Readers of the text may find this surprising, for in the written play, Henry appears to have every reason to feel confident. Indeed, the text suggests that he is in fact confident that his invasion of France is just, for he believes that God is supporting him in his cause. As Henry declares in Act II Scene ii, God has " [smoothed] every rub... on our way" (2.2. 188). Similarly, we assume the king has great confidence in the loyalty of his followers, for the play frequently reminds us of the love his subjects bear for him.

Indeed, as the Earl of Westmoreland asserts, and many others echo, never did any English king have "nobles richer and more loyal subjects" than Henry has (1.2. 127). Thus, the text gives no indication whatsoever that Henry is insecure. Despite this confident image, however, Branagh's screenplay portrays Henry as a man consumed by paranoia. Contrary to our expectation, Branagh's Henry doubts not only the loyalty of his followers, but even the justice of his own actions. We first see this insecurity in Act II Scene ii of the film, after Henry exposes the three traitors.

Pinning Scroop to the table, Henry laments that after being betrayed like this, he will regard even "the full-fraught man and best indued" with suspicion (2.2. 139). As he says this, his eyes dart around the room, settling on Exeter, Bedford, and Westmoreland in turn. Branagh thus suggests that the king is so paranoid he trusts no one, not even his own relatives.

Moreover, in Act IV Scene i of the film, Henry reveals his doubts about whether or not his invasion of France is just. Although he maintains that "his cause [is] just and his quarrel honorable", we notice his eyes nervously shifting as he makes this claim (4.1. 130). These eye movements, along with his slow enunciation and exaggerated vocal inflections, suggest some doubt on Henry's part about what he himself proclaims. We see more of his doubt and paranoia later in the scene, when he desperately prays for success in battle, begging God not to punish him for his father's crimes. Thus, although the text portrays Henry as a confident ruler, Branagh's film refutes this image by exposing him as an insecure man, suspicious of his subjects and fearful of how God will judge his actions.

Branagh not only conveys these feelings of insecurity, but also attempts to pinpoint their causes. As Henry's prayer the night before the battle suggests, the source of his paranoia may very well be his guilt about his father's usurpation of the crown. Another cause of Henry's self-doubts could be his feelings of shame and inferiority over the many times his father had expressed disappointment in him. Yet another possibility, one Branagh himself suggests, is that Henry's fears reflect the guilt and isolation he suffers from having rejected his tavern friends. In his screenplay, Branagh illuminates this last possibility through flashbacks. In one of them, shown during Falstaff's death, we see the old knight begging Prince Hal never to abandon him.

His pained response to Hal's "I know thee not, old man" suggests to us the guilt Henry suffers from having "killed his [friend's] heart" (2.1. 91). We see the king's pain even more clearly in Act Scene vi of the film, when Branagh inserts a flashback of Bardolph. In this flashback, Bardolph jokingly asks Hal not to hang thieves when he is king. The shock on his face when Henry orders his execution, along with the king's own tears upon seeing his friend dead, clearly exhibits the isolation Henry endures. Through these flashbacks, Branagh emphasizes how important Falstaff and Bardolph once were to Henry.

He thus effectively conveys a sense of guilt the text never seems to suggest. This pain and isolation, along with the guilt his father's crimes cause, may have led Henry to his present feelings of insecurity. Kenneth Branagh's portrayal of Henry as a mere human susceptible to feelings of vengefulness, insecurity, and guilt can be interpreted in a number of ways. His decision to depict Henry's darker qualities instead of reinforcing his ideal-king image may simply reflect a desire to lend realism and depth to an otherwise one-dimensional character. It is even possible, since the movie was made at the end of the Cold War, that this harsh portrayal of Henry is a condemnation of the imperialism widely condoned during Shakespeare's time.

Regardless of why Branagh decided to refute the prevalent perception of Henry, however, his film definitely illustrates how the same lines of text can be interpreted in completely different ways.