Bush's Campaign Ads example essay topic

Since 1952, television has played a major role in presidential elections. Television allows candidates to reach a broad number of people, and personalities, to help push along their campaigns. Campaigns help the candidates just as much as the voters. The candidates get to be identified, and known to the voters, and the voters get to hear and see how a specific candidate identifies with their needs and wants. The best way to get this information out there is through the most used form of media, television. When candidates develop a plan of attack for campaign advertising, they tend to aim for at least four types of commercials.

One form or type of commercial is those which play on the fears of countrymen. Fear is a good emotion to play on, if your opponent is "unknown or untested" nationally. Instill in fear of the opponent is a good way to gain the upper hand in an election, because if people don't feel their president can make safe and smart decision, nine times out of ten they will not want that person in office. In the past the "fear" factor, made people think what if? And in return they start to second guess who they want in office. In the election of 2004, the bush campaign ran an advertisement; whose focus was to act on the fear of Americans.

The bush campaign ran an ad titled "Finish It" (1). This ad showed that the war in Iraq was necessary, and needed, and if John Kerry was elected to office the harmful acts against America would go unpunished. I didn't particular like this ad, but I think the message was clear and a lot of Americans identified with this ad. The impact of this ad, caused myself and many others to think, that if we elect a new president in war time, what would happen to the people in Iraq, and more importantly what would happen to the troops. Another type of commercial that campaigns look to run is the "real people" ad, or the ads that show the candidate to be "just like everyone else". These ads are used to connect with the people, and show how a candidate relates to the needs and wants of everyone.

When people get the feeling that a candidate can relate to their needs and wants, they lean more toward supporting that candidate. Campaigns allow the candidate to reach out to prospective voters and get the issues out. Candidates hope to learn what exactly voters want. Campaigns help in setting the image that each political party want to convey, an image of honesty, trust worthiness, and good spirit. During the 2004 election, President Bush's campaign ads showed him to be a leader and a strong president in a time when leadership was needed. Kerry's ad showed him to be a people person, and a person who connects with the citizen of this country.

Political parties also use ads that make there opponent out to be the bad guy, and often these ads come from what their opponent has said in the past. Candidates use information from the past to display the image that there opponent can not be trusted and will go back on his or her word. This is typically called "flip flopping". When candidates make there opponent out to be a flip flopper, the opponent is making things worst for themselves. The Republican Party ran a series of ads that made Senator Kerry look like a flip flopper, and I think the overall effective ness of those ads was a major factor in the election, but Senator Kerry also stated his claims and told the voter how he fells on the very same issues that the republican party made senator Kerry to look indecisive on. Campaigns that are introducing a candidate to mainstream national coverage tend to run ads that will show a candidates history and their background.

These ads might list what some might call the qualification needed to be in office. These ads usually show a record of good decision making, leadership, honesty, and overall good nature. These ads provide a sense of legitimacy with voters, and let the public know that this is someone who can lead the country. Senator Kerry's Heart ad is a good example of what the people needed to know about John Kerry, and what makes him a good leader. The ad, Safer and Stronger, by the Republican Party was one of the better ads produced because President Bush didn't speak, and it made Americans think, "this is a time when we need to unite and stick together to help our country". Another ad that was effective during the campaign was the Double Speak ad, this opened the door to the idea that Senator Kerry was a flip flopper, and he can not be trusted.

The pessimism ad by the Republican Party proved to be an affective ad, because again President Bush didn't speak, and the ad concentrated on the positive things that are being done, and how the president is showing progress after a time of recession, and war. The heart ad that was ran by the Democratic Party proved to be effective because it showed Senator Kerry as a man who makes key decisions, a man who fights for and believes in his country, and it showed a man who has spirit and heart. The strength ad along with most of the other ads ran by the Democratic Party showed Senator Kerry and a leader, and a strong representation as to what this country looks for and hopes for. Senator Kerry ran an honest campaign that rallied people and put hope into their lives. The ads that were ran in the 2004 election, were very different in there content and there attitude. On the republican side you had an overwhelming amount of ads that made Senator Kerry seem like a person who you could not trust, and a person who only looks out for his own best interest.

Where as on the democratic platform you have ad that show Americans rallying together, you have ads that appeal to a sensitive, family oriented nation that just want to feel safe and secure. The democratic ads are warm and caring, while the republican ads are cold and stern. Unlike ads of the past the ads displayed in the 2004 election were heavily focused on information and factual content. The voters are forced to make a decision on war, foreign affairs, and military issues. The scope and focus of the ads form both political parties were mainly to get voted in the ever so popular electoral swing states. I think the ad were obviously effective due to the outcome of the election.

Political ad make all of the difference when it come to those state who are on the border and you never know which way the electorate will vote. And Negative ads play an even bigger role because people always forget the good things about a person and always remember the bad.