Changes To Gun Laws example essay topic

AMERICA " GUN CONTROL ISSUE CAN THERE BE A COMPROMISE? According to the F.B.I., 9,369 murders involving firearms took place in the year 2002 within the United States. We as Americans have the right to "bear arms", however there can be some changes to at least try to minimize these casualties. The 2nd Amendment states "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". This may be outdated now that we have a strong military (that is our "well regulated Militia", ) to protect our security, but can a right be scratched off the Constitution because of someone's interpretation? Perhaps there can be some changes to the laws to determine who can own a firearm and what types of weapons can be sold.

In Arizona and many other states there are no permits required to purchase any type of firearm. While other states have more laws to determine who can own a gun. New York requires you to have a permit to purchase and then register a handgun. The permit may be issued if the applicant is over 18 years of age, has not been convicted of a felony or spent more than one year in prison, and is not an addict, alcoholic or convicted of a narcotics offense. New York also requires the gun stores selling rifles, shotguns, or handguns, provide with the gun a locking device and a label on safe storage.

As of March, 2001, any firearms dealer licensed in the state of New York must provide to the state police, along with the original receipt of sale, a sealed container enclosing a shell casing from the handgun sold within ten days of the transfer of a handgun. Gun control groups are requesting a bill that would create a national handgun licensing and registration system, and that would extend the Brady law to the secondary market of handgun purchases such as gun shows. Under the Brady II legislation it will be illegal to sell, deliver, or otherwise transfer a handgun to someone who does not have an FFL (Federal Firearms License), unless the dealer verifies that the buyer has a valid state handgun license. It will also make it a violation of the law for anyone who does not hold an FFL to obtain, either through purchase or as a gift, a handgun or handgun ammunition unless they possess a valid state handgun license. Brady II would require state officials to set up and manage a license system, design a program of study for handgun safety classes, and issue certificates. Richard Dug eal is an NRA and state certified firearms safety instructor of five years at the Desert Trails Gun Club and Training Facility in Tucson, Arizona.

He also is an instructor for the home protection class and the concealed weapons course needed for the permit to conceal a weapon. Like many NRA members Richard does not want to see any bans on any firearm. He believes the Second Amendment gives every American the right to own a gun. Richard walks the streets of Tucson carrying a concealed weapon. I asked Richard if he feels there could be some changes to gun laws to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals.

Richard was adamant in saying "no changes are needed". Richard believes the law regarding gun shows and private trading of firearms are "sufficient", which only requires one to ask if the customer is a prohibited possessor, which covers the vendor's liability in Arizona. I also asked Richard if he would agree to a license to purchase firearms that would require firearm safety certification. Richard says he is strongly against any license to purchase firearms, as for the safety course he said "I am not against the idea" and he would support first time gun owners required to take a firearm safety class. I questioned Richard about strict penalties for gun violations like Boston's ten year penalty for felons in possession of a firearm. Richard says he believes intentional gun violators such as bank robbers, deserve a heavy penalty, however, unintentional violators like "concealing a weapon without knowing you need a permit", should not be penalized as severely.

Richard also stated that in July of 1996, a law was passed that restricts anyone convicted of domestic violence from possessing a firearm. U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) introduced the 'Our Lady of Peace Act' in 2002, to overhaul America's flawed background check system stating "Congress has learned that millions of records are missing from the NICS (National Instant Criminal Background Check System) database. Over a 30-month period, 10,000 criminals obtained a firearm despite a background check because the records couldn't be checked properly within the 3 days allowed by federal law. In addition, thousands of other prohibited buyers will never be stopped because very few restraining order, drug abuse or mental disability records are kept at all. This report makes it clear that if we are to be serious about stopping criminals, wife-beaters and illegal aliens from slipping through a background check, we had better fix this broken system". Crimes are not committed by law abiding gun owners.

Perhaps we need to take a look at the felons released from prison; most violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders. In state correctional facilities, ninety percent of felons who have been convicted for weapons charges had prior convictions. Forty-four percent of those felons convicted for weapons offenses had prior convictions for violent crimes. Boston has a 10 year penalty for felons that are caught possessing a firearm. Tougher penalties for gun violations may be one place to start. Other countries have started restricting people from owning firearms with gun control laws in hopes to reduce crime.

Between 1996 and 1998, Australia agreed to pass a new gun control law where the guns must be registered by the owner and a reason is needed to own a gun, in which self-defense is not an acceptable reason. In the years 1996-1997, Australia destroyed almost 700,000 guns, which are about one-seventh the guns in Australia. In America that number would be around 30 million. By 1998, homicides by firearms were down thirty percent in Australia. In 1991 and 1995 Canada established new gun laws reducing the number of deaths caused by guns to a thirty year low. The UK banned handguns and destroyed the guns the government bought from the citizens.

Within a year later, gun-related violations have decreased by thirteen percent in England and Wales. Some say that Americans are fifty times more likely than British citizens to be killed by a firearm. Many people in America do not want to see a ban on firearms, but if that is not the answer what is? Perhaps what we need is for the anti-gun groups and the pro-gun groups to come together and reach some sort of a compromise that could help reduce our nation's homicide rates.

Bibliography

National Center for Health Statistics Center for Disease Control and Prevention FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) NRA (National Rifle Association) John McCain @ mccain. senate. gov web web.