Charles Darnay And Sydney Carton example essay topic
He represents the common man. The common class was an important part of the Revolution. 4.) Monseigneur- Monseigneur represents the aristocracy. The aristocracy was obsessed with money and quite corrupt. The Monseigneur is money crazed and corrupt. He is important to the portrayal of the aristocrats and their contribution to the cause of the revolution.
5.) Knitting- The knitting referred to is done by Madame Defarge. Throughout the story, she is knitting a list of people to kill. This is an important piece of the story. 6.) Mr. Lorry- Mr. Lorry is the first character we meet in the book. He is responsible for the reunion of Dr. Manette and Lucie. He is also significant throughout the story because he is a consistent element who helps to tie the story together.
1.) What was unjust about the arrest and condemnation of Darnay? During the Revolution, aristocrats were being arrested for money. Charles Darnay, also known as Charles Evermonde, was arrested only because of his aristocrat last name. He did not want this name or the corruption behind it. Charles was a good man who was arrested for simply having the wrong last name. It was indeed an unjust arrest.
2.) Give four examples of the motif "recalled to life". The motif of this story appears many times. Its first appearance is when Dr. Manette and Lucie are reunited. Dr. Manette's life was miserable. He feels as though he is recalled to life when he meets his daughter. Another example is when Charles Darnay is in court for the first time.
If guilty, he would have been put to death, but the appearance of Sydney Carton is so similar to Darnay's, that he is set free. A third example is when Sydney Carton meets and falls in love with Lucie. He is a miserable man who believes in nothing, but he falls in love with Lucie and this brings the good in him out. My final example occurs when Charles is in prison the final time. He received the death sentence, but was recalled to life when Sydney takes his place under the guillotine. The motif in this story is obvious.
3.) Contrast London and Paris in the book. London and Paris were both corrupt, but London's conditions were better. In London and Paris there were corrupt leaders. In London there was a lot of crime and highway robberies.
The laws in both places were unfair. At this time London was experiencing the Industrial Revolution, while France was not. All in all, London had better conditions because the people were not revolting against the king. 4.) Contrast Darnay and Carton. Charles Darnay and Sydney Carton are different in many ways. Charles Darnay is a kind, caring man.
This personality trait is shown immediately when he is introduced in the book. On the ship, Darnay helps Lucie with her father. It is obvious that he is a good man. Carton, however, believes that nobody cares about him. This causes him to care about nobody in return. He is a cruel and bitter man.
5.) State the theme and give three examples of the theme. The theme of A Tale of Two Cities is love triumphs over all. This is present in many situations of the story. It is out of Dr. Manette's love for Lucie that he is "recalled to life". His love triumphed over his pain. It is Lucie's love for Charles that prevents her from imprisoning him.
Her love conquered the corruption. Finally, it is Sydney's love for Lucie that causes him to give his own life for her happiness. Love conquered his bitterness and caused him to care. Love definitely conquers all.
7.) Was Lucie a believable character? Believable is defined as the ability of eliciting trust or confidence. In A Tale of Two Cities, Lucie Manette is portrayed as a perfect young woman. She is loving and very forgiving. Anyone who meets her is in love instantly. It is because of this annoying perfection that I don't find her to be believable.
Nobody on Earth is perfect. We are taught from birth that nobody is perfect, so how am I to believe in a perfect character? God is the only one who can be characterized as perfect; therefore, Lucie is not a believable character. 8.) Was it fitting that Madame Defarge die as she did? It is said that when you are filled with hatred, you create your own end. Madame Defarge was an evil woman who was filled with hatred.
She knits a list of people to kill, and refuses to be forgiving. It is while she is trying to kill, that she is killed. Her death was ironic, while also fitting.