Clone example essay topic

Clone 2 Since the beginning of time no organism has ever tried to alter the natural process of life, however humans have begun to change this. Cloning began with the world-renowned sheep Dolly, which was cloned, or copied, in 1997. To clone means to genetically create identical copies of a living thing from a single cell. It is a group of organisms, derived from another organism by an asexual reproductive process.

Usually the members of a clone are identical in their inherited characteristics, and in their genes. The clone Dolly has aroused the interests of many people because of its scientific and ethical implications. When talking to anyone about cloning you will know from the first word how they feel about the subject. Though the Human Genome Program presents both the pros and cons to cloning on their Website, they are definitely for cloning.

On the other hand Time Magazine has another point of view. They believe cloning will destroy life as it is and put an end to the natural process of life. This research paper is going to discuss both the pros and cons of cloning, and the benefits, if any, to society. Our society as a whole seems to profit endlessly from the products of cloning. The technological benefits of cloning clearly outweigh the possible social consequences. In the minds of biotechnologist's, the final products of cloning, like farm animals, and laboratory mice will not be the most important achievements.

The applications of cloning that are in visioned are not nightmarish and inhumane, but will improve the overall quality of science and life. Cloning will help produce discoveries that will affect the study of genetics, cell development, human growth, and obstetrics. Human cloning should not be the issue; it is merely the threat to the continuation of cloning research. Cloning gives the capability to create humans with identical genetic makeup to Clone 3 whoever, or whatever, you want. With an identical genetic makeup doctors will be able to create perfect organ donor matches. A clone could provide an elderly man or woman with a new liver, or even a new heart.

This procedure would be as easy as shopping for a brand new part for your car. All you do is go to the shop and pick your part. This would work because it is an exact copy, therefore your body will not reject it, yet the body will continue to act as one as if nothing ever happened. With the benefits of cloning people will be able to get transplants sooner without having to be on a waiting list, and there would almost be a hundred percent rate that your body will accept it's new part.

The benefits don't end there. Imagine a married couple who wants to have a child, but after many times trying it seems they can not conceive a baby. Perhaps the mom or the dad is sterile; so their dreams are crushed. Cloning has the ability to solve this problem as well. Cloning makes it possible for sterile couples to produce offspring. A single sperm cell is taken from the father, and an egg from the mother.

The sperm and the egg are then mated and placed in incubation. With the help of scientists, the egg splits up to what is called the "fourth stage" and is then placed back into the mother's body for a normal birth. The dream of the married couple is fulfilled and a baby is born. Society is deaf, dumb, and blind if it does not see the obvious reasons not to clone. Cloning presents as much a moral problem as a technical problem. For part of society, cloning is an affront to religious sensibilities; it seems like "playing God", and interfering with the natural process of life.

There are, of course, more logical objections, regarding susceptibility to disease, expense, and diversity. Others are worried about the abuses of cloning. Cloning appears to be a powerful force that can be exploited to produce Clone 4 horrendous results. We have the freedom of speech, congregation, and, most important, Religion. With these rights comes our choice of religion, and with religion comes morals. Every person's morals are different, thus, the decision to clone or not to clone should not be decided by some one whose morals say it is right (web).

Whose decision could have enough weight to it, to decide weather or not we should "play god"? Playing God would be interfering with the natural processes of life itself (web). Cloning will hold a risk of producing a population that is entirely the same, genetically. This has such a great risk held to it that the entire human population could be wiped out by a single virus, which could only occur from a lack of genetic diversity (web). Also, if cloning were perfect in humans there would be no genetic need for men. Women could wipe out the population of men and still live.

The natural process of life has not been disturbed for billions of years. It is just the way things have and always should be. If cloning is allowed society will not be ready for a perfect baby. Is perfection even desired? Imperfection is the key element why no two humans are the same. Imperfections are what make you and I unique.

If cloning were to be allowed the world would not be able to progress through time, but in actuality it would be digressing. Hitler wanted all Jewish people dead and wanted to create an Arian race by demolishing and killing all people who were not blonde hair and blue eyes. With cloning, a psychotic person can once again try to create a race with no imperfections, or even create a "perfect-human". If cloning were used to produce a "perfect human", it could be created with above normal Clone 5 strength and sub-normal intelligence, conceiving a genetic underclass (web). This could be used in an incorrect manner and someone could construct a mere army of "perfect-humans" to be used against it's own country. Another con of cloning is its accuracy.

If it took two hundred and seventy seven times to correctly clone a sheep, how many tries will it take to get one human right? Every try that goes wrong is the death of a human. Even if humans were cloned there would be no place to store them. There would be special buildings with tons of half-dead, half-alive twins of you and me.

It would be a human parts farm where people go to pick them selves out, and tear up their body. Just think about the chances of a clone getting out. There could be an exact copy of someone out on the streets, and who knows what it would do. So, to clone or not to clone. That is the question. With the positives and the negatives that will result from cloning, there might never be a right answer.

As of 1997 the president has taken in account his own morals and has answered, "Not to clone". What would your answer be?