Cloning Of A Human Being example essay topic

Cloning Will Not Benefit Society Works Cited Dixon, Patrick. Reasons Against Cloning. 26 July 2002 Holy Bible, King James Version. Anaheim, CA: Lock man Foundation, 1998. Kayotic Development.

Anti-Cloning Research. 22 July 2002 New Scientist: Raising The Dead 22 July 2002 Nussbaum, Martha C., and Cass R. Sun stein. Clones and Clones. W.W. Norton & Company. New York. London, 1998 Pence, Gregory E., ed. Flesh Of My Flesh.

Rowman & Little Field Publishers, Inc., Oxford, 1998 Roleff, Tamara L., ed. Biomedical Ethics Opposing Viewpoints. Green haven Press Inc., San Diego, CA, 1998 Silver, Lee M. Remaking Eden. Avon Books, New York, 1997 The Benefits Of Cloning 21 July 2002 Arriola 7 Cloning What is Cloning? What the differences between Cloning and In Vitro Fertilization? What are the Risks?

Will it benefit our society? Does the government restrict cloning research? Is cloning morally and ethically wrong? Does it violate a person's individuality? Who and when was the first clone? Can human be cloned?

What is the US standpoint on cloning? Is cloning "playing God"? Where will cloning lead us as a society? Will people learn to accept or reject cloning? What are the religious aspects of cloning?

Who will be selected to be cloned? Will cloning be out of hand? Arriola 1 Cloning Will Not Benefit Society Michael Jordan passes to Michael Jordan, he misses, rebound by Michael Jordan. MJ goes up for two, the basket counts!! Bulls win a 245-78 victory!!

Imagine cloning a great superstar to dominate a sport, or a notorious leader like Adolf Hitler to rule a nation, with this in mind cloning can lead to endless possibilities. Producing clones would lead to a society with no diversity in which everything would be entirely the same. Cloning is a controversial topic in which the public denies it as inappropriate, while some scientific leaders say it can benefit our society. We have been able to clone many things from plants, vegetables, animals and maybe one day the human race. Today some scientist' have expressed their desire to be the first to clone a human with hopes of great triumph, but they have forgotten about the moral and religious issues on hand. Cloning should be banned because there are too many risks and not enough benefits for our society.

Cloning would be creating a breed that has no flaws, and since perfection does not exist, the clone will be a great disappointment (Kayotic). During the early twentieth century, the word clone was used to describe groups of plants that are propagated by the use of any form of vegetative parts. "Since then, cloning has been used to describe the process of when a cell, or group, is taken from one single organism to make an entirely new organism". (qt d. Silver 93) Scientist have been cloning plants and vegetable for a while now but cloning animals or human usually is not as easily.

Many fail to realize that differences do exist in reproductive cloning, the cloning of a human being. The physical aspect of the clone is exact but the thoughts, memories and personality are not recreated. (Nussbaum 37) Man did not always create cloning. Nature also has its share in cloning.

Identical twins are perfect examples of clones. Twins occur by chance in humans and other mammals, with the Arriola 2 separation of a single embryo into halves at the early stage of development. Even twins are different by intelligence and personality. (30-31) In February 1997, the world was stunned to find out that scientists from the Roslin Institute in Scotland had cloned a sheep.

While this may have sounded like a breakthrough for science, what we were not told was that it took 277 attempts to finally get it right. It took twenty-nine embryo implants before the sheep was produced, which means that twenty-eight were miscarriages. (Roleff 34) Society probably would not accept human cloning considering the fact that a mother would have a great chance of having miscarriages. Another animal that was cloned was a cow. The cow was cloned by using cells taken from a portion of beef, 48 hours after it was slaughtered. The scientists select which cows they will clone depending on the quality of meat it will produce and they also look for desirable traits such as the ability to put on weight.

(New Scientist) Will it be the same if human reproductive cloning accused? Will they only choose humans with specific characteristics to clone? This can also bring up racial or gender issues that can affect our society. There are also ways in which therapeutic cloning, the cloning or growing of stem cells and tissue, that can help our society.

Cloning organs or tissue without creating entire humans would be acceptable since you are not cloning a fully developed human. We could be able to clone heart cells to inject into damaged hearts. "There has been a breakthrough with human stem cell. Embryonic stem cells can be grown to produce organs or tissues to replace or repair damaged ones" (qt d.

The Benefits). There are many people today that need organ transplant and by using this method many lives could be saved. With this we can treat diseases like multiple sclerosis, cancer, or diabetes. Arriola 3 On the other hand, we have to ask ourselves who will be able to receive cloned organs.

Will there only be certain circumstances which people can receive cloned organs? The idea of cloning entire human beings just for the purpose of "spare parts" has been considered (Roleff 45) A cloned human would be just as entitled to their arm and leg as their original would. How would you feel if they told you that you were cloned to supply organs for someone else? You would feel like your rights were taken from you and there is no purpose in living.

Some have also proposed cloning humans without head to avoid them being alive and organ transplant could be more acceptable. The human cloning process can be similar to Test-tube babes or In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) because both are conceived outside the mother's womb. In a test-tube baby, a single egg from the mother is taken and added to sperm that is taken from the father. Fertilization takes place and the fertilized egg is then placed into the mother's uterus. The difference is that in cloning, they only take one cell organism from one parent, and the child becomes identical to the parent. Instead of having the characteristics of two parents, you only have them from one.

(Pence 39) Also in IVF a doctor often places many fertilized eggs into a woman's uterus counting on one for pregnancy, but sometimes women can only supply one egg. In cloning, an egg can be divided into eight zygotes for implanting. Here the chances of pregnancy are much greater. (41) It was hard at first for society to accept IVF but as time when on they did and they are scared to think that one day cloning could be accepted. There are various risks in which reproductive cloning may cause.

What is this technology was available in the 1940's, what would Hitler have done? There are many powerful leaders who will abuse this technology to create large armies of the same person. It would be hard to control Arriola 4 cloning if it does become part of our society. We also have to ask ourselves who will get cloned? Will it be a nice person like you and I or someone with great power and influence like Saddam Hussein. Cloning cost a lot of money in which most people don't have.

There has also been a vast majority of pregnancies involving animal clones that have gone bad. The clone had sometimes died or either put their lives or the mother's at risk. In some cases the clone grows abnormally large inside the mother, or become swollen with fluid, forcing the mother to abort. Only a little more than 1% of animal clones have actually made it. Some of the abnormalities, which they get, are malfunctioning livers, underdeveloped lungs, and possibly hidden genetic defects. (Dixon) How would the mother feel if she knows that the chances of her child being normal are slim?

There is also the religious aspect to human cloning. Some people call reproductive cloning "Playing God". The bible says, "Then the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life: and man became a living being (qt d. Bible). God should be the only one with the power to make life.

We should leave the creation of humans up to God, and not play God ourselves. People could also be cloned without their knowledge by using blood or a piece of hair. How would one feel if you are walking one day and see an exact duplicate of yourself: one would freak. There is also the psychological distress in the later twin for reproductive cloning. Many don't realize that along with physical deformities, the mind can play a big part in a clone's life. The clone might feel that their lives have already been laid out and so they will feel like they are would not be in control of their own fate in life.

They will feel that there uniqueness and individuality has been taken away. On the other note, the clone might feel the pressure to have higher standards and more accomplishments than the earlier twin. (Nussbaum 152) The only way Arriola 5 to avoid these burdens is for cloning never to take place. One should put themselves in the clones shoe before they try to create a life.

In conclusion, we have to ask ourselves if we want live in a diverse society or if we want everything to be the same. Cloning may cause people to settle for the best existing animals, not even allowing nature to take its role in improvement. The government as put temporary laws enacted against cloning, but they need to make it concrete and prohibit scientists from recreating our human race. (Kayotic) There are just too many risks and issues that cloning brings. Cloning will intervene with the normal cycle of life and not let evolution takes its role. Every human has a right to have a unique identity and human cloning violates that.

Cloning is not a way to advance our race. People have to remember that reproductive cloning is a lot more than just recreating the physical aspect of a human. We have to take into consideration all the consequences that could happen. Would clones be able to be accepted as normal people in our society?

Cloning would eliminate the uniqueness which each one of us posses. We have to remember that it took 277 attempts to finally successfully clone an animal. Considering that statistic the impact on human cloning will be devastating. Society is just not ready for such complications.