Cloning Of Humans And Nuclear Cell Fusion example essay topic

The social issue being reviewed in this report is the cloning of humans and nuclear cell fusion. This question ing into every household... Are we and should we be playing God? This question has substantial points on each side.

Some people think that we shouldn't be manipulating nature's creations, and we should leave things the way they are because that is the way things are meant to be. Other's oppose that jurisdiction and state that we can rid the world of cancers and tumors and quite possibly save lives. Others don't believe strongly either way; though believe in restricted means of distinguishing forms of cloning using safe and well-tested means. Research on human embryos has been minimal over the past few years because of the lack of money from the government to perform sophisticated experiments in this area. "In the 1980's and early 1990's this research was banned by both the Ronald Reagan and Bush administrations due to pressure from the pro-life factions of the Republican party". The societal issue addressed is expressed from all point of views, and the following will further strengthen and help you understand their points.

"The procedures used in human embryo cloning have been around for many years, and have been used in the cloning of cattle and sheep embryos, for the production of animals with known genetic traits. The news of human embryo cloning did not surprise many people in the scientific community, but it shocked the general public". (psu. edu) many biologists believe that they have a personal duty to the improvement of society, perhaps even a moral obligation. To this end the techniques of embryonic cloning and alteration have been offered to society as an option for the improvement of humanity. Doctors hope that by being able to study the multiple embryos developed through cloning, they can determine the causes of spontaneous abortions. Contraceptive specialists believe that if they can determine how an embryo knows where to implant itself, they can develop a contraceptive that would prevent embryos from implanting in the uterus. This all means that cloning would help our future and help us further understand our human bodies.

A defensive statement for this would be that these scientists are creating genes and are pushing the scientific envelope. How much further can they go? What if they create something that evolves to withstand forces of nature and science? Anything is possible when you play with something you fully don't understand. Cancer research is possibly the most important reason for embryo cloning. Oncologists believe that embryonic study will advance understanding of the rapid cell growth of cancer.

Cancer cells develop at approximately the same speed as embryonic cells do. By studying the embryonic cell growth, scientists may be able to determine how to stop cancer growth in turn. Some ask is it worth the risk? Others oppose this question with, is it worth the risk to not know its full potential and how it can help us.

These questions are few of the hundreds now argued throughout the world in courts and legislatures. The whole article I read was basically about the world verses cloning and nuclear genetic fusion. In other words building life out of other living things. When we play with items we don't understand we risk a lot and it can mean moral or physical disaster if something goes wrong. Imagine those who die daily because of lack of donors of organs, we could create donors. We can better understand cancer cells and spontaneous abortion and further understand nature and oneself.

Understanding cloning will take awhile but the potential of such would be great. I feel this article helped me understand cloning even more than I did. I feel that cloning has a future and will take part in our lives. Yet what we don't understand can be dangerous. My analysis of cloning is, it may develop more ideas than we think were ever possible, but we should be careful and take respectful means of precaution. Government oppression will be ic opposed and science will run its course and in a few years the government will have little part in cloning and the people who worked for it will receive the credit they deserve.

Cloning is the future of science and the answer many have longed for. When people don't understand things, they dissect it and find out how it works. Upon doing this, if they still don't understand it, they get scared, and they reject it. The big issue with cloning is that religious fanatics don't understand it, so they shun it and think that it is wrong. Cloning is the process of making a genetically identical organism through non- means.

It has been used for many years to produce plants (even growing a plant from a cutting is a type of cloning). Plant cloning gardeners have been cloning plants for centuries and plants have been doing it for longer. Here are three different types of cloning out of many. One type of plant cloning naturally occurs when a plant grows a runner.

The runner grows horizontally across the ground forming a carbon copy of that same plant at the end. Eventually the runner dies and the daughter plant is separated from the mother plant. Another is when you cut a branch or leaf off of a plant and plant it. It will grow another identical plant. That od is called a cutting. A stolon is where a weak branch of a plant falls over and the tip touches the ground.

The tip swells and roots are formed so that growth in the plant can continue. Animal cloning lower forms of animals clone themselves quite often like amoeba's and paramecium which use binary fission to split themselves in half and create a new but identical animal. The only other kind of cloning in animals is nuclear transfer cloning, which is the whole topic of this paper. Nuclear transfer is when the nucleus of one cell is implanted into another cell that has had the nucleus taken out.

The first time this happened was when Robert Briggs and T.J. King took the nucleus out of a multi-cell embryo and implanted it into the egg. Cell division then takes place and forms into a tadpole then into a frog. This process has been repeated with mice, sheep, monkeys, etc. That is called embryonic cloning. The kind of cloning that created Dolly is when an animal is cloned. What happened in Dolly's case is that Ian Will mut and his team of scientists took a nucleus from a Finn Dorset sheep and substituted it with a nucleus of an egg from a Poll Dorset.

Once the egg had developed to embryo stage it was implanted into a third breed of sheep a Scottish Blackface. Dolly came out 148 days later as an exact genetic copy of the Finn Dorset. The other important thing about Dolly is that her genes came from a sheep. The cells came from a frozen mammary gland.

Since March 1997, the birth of a cloned sheep, named Dolly, has caused a great sensation around the world. Though it was not the first time that the experiment using cloning succeeded, the reason why Dolly shocked the world was that she was the first clone from a cell of an mammal, something previously thought to be impossible. This meant that the possibility of cloning human beings was increased. For fear of realizing human cloning, a lot of countries have taken necessary measures to regulate the study of it. Some people, such as scientists in this field and certain infertile couples, are now arguing against banning it. Animal cloning has been the subject of scientific experiments for years, but garnered little attention until the birth of Dolly.

Since Dolly, several scientists have cloned other animals, including cows and mice. The recent success in cloning animals has sparked fierce debates among scientists, politicians and the general public about the use and morality of cloning plants, animals and possibly humans. France and Germany, who proposed a two-step approach, initially led the opposition to a total ban. They argue that there is very strong international support for a worldwide ban on cloning babies, but less support for a ban on "therapeutic" cloning for research and medical purposes. So, in summary, cloning is your friend. Would you reject your friend?

The answer is no. Cloning can open a wide new variety of life and can bring many philosophers, great thinkers, great scientist any many other great historical people. You must support cloning and embrace it. That way, you will see the light. Open your eyes, and support cloning.

Bibliography

web web web web Gilmore McKinnell, Robert CLONING- A biologist reports 1979 University of Minnesota Press Ramsey, P.
The Ethics of Fetal Research. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.
Steward, F.C. Totipotency, variation and clonal development of cultured cells. Endeavor 29: 117-24, 1970.