Cloning Process example essay topic

Cloning: A Nuisance or Necessity So many miraculous discoveries have been made during the last century. Medical technology has advanced at an unprecedented rate. Now, we are faced with yet another scientific breakthrough. Cloning, in recent years has taken its own shape under the spotlight. However, people are debating whether or not it should be done. I mean, "Is it morally correct, humane, possible?

How will it affect the future of humanity?" There are those who feel that we should step forward and support the idea. Proponents believe that the technology will be used for the good of mankind. Experts say that the technology may be used to help terminally ill patients in a therapeutic way. Others, however, are trying to stop the practice before it has a chance to realize its true potential because they are afraid of future hazards. They think that someone or some country will use the technology to aid them in war. They do not think that it should be accepted because of many of our religious beliefs.

Opponents of cloning believe the benefits could never outweigh the potentially horrid process. People who promote the idea of cloning claim that it will probably be used for very good reasons. Today's list of people needing organ transplants because of disease or deformation at birth could be clearly in only a few years. The technology may advance to a point where children born with missing limbs or deformed parts could actually be removed and replaced with a fully functional, completely healthy limb. If cloning were ever to reach its full potential, the benefits would be virtually limitless. There would be laboratories where the sole purpose of that lab would be to make replicas of one's self, so that if the person ever had anything wrong with their body, it could be fixed by simply going and having a surgery that would give them a replacement.

It would have matching DNA and would be 100% compatible with the body. In theory, people could extend their lives for hundreds of years. Who can say that cloning is done for the purpose of medicine. Opposers of cloning claim that the technology is not being developed for the safety of humanity, but by the demand of the people. It is for the people out there who believe that it could give them a new start every time they feel like they are old. It could give them a sense of immortality.

Opposers say that no one should be able to play "God", by creating human life. They say it isn't ethical, and it is very inhumane. To create a body without a head, for example, should no used as one's own personal organ garden. Something they simply go to and harvest every time that they have and ache in their body. Yet, you may fall into the category that most others may reside in. These people know that cloning could be used in so many ways, good or bad, but they consider the benefits that it could bring.

Most agree that limitations need to be set. Realizing the advances that such technology could bring, they feel that it may be necessary to allow the cloning process to continue and to be studied. As you can see, each of these groups have very strong points for feeling the way that they do. You just have to consider your own views. What if u ever needed an organ transplant?

What if it only benefited people in the high upper class? What if it were regulated and required to be done in controlled environments? You have to be your own judge on this one. Will you be for it, against it, or will you allow the research to continue if guidelines and restrictions were to be set in place? Only the future knows the fate of cloning.