Colleges Student Athletes example essay topic

Does the attempt to have high quality athletes on campus undermine educational standards? Sports that are provided by the college, are what attract a large number of students to the school. The standards that the school sets for these students are a reflection of how the school views academics, and the importance that academics are to the school. The attempt to have high quality athletes on campus is secondary in regards to academics. Any and all colleges have a minimum G.P.A. requirement that all students must maintain before they are able to graduate. This standard does not change for athletes of any caliber.

High quality athletes on campus don't undermine educational standards, but it provides a benchmark for the future of education and athletics. High quality athletes often surpass the minimum requirements. This shows that the college views excellence as a beneficial attribute, therefore increasing its position as an academically focused institution. Athletes in general are brought up with the drive and determination to achieve, and if they don't do well they are pushed in the direction that is most beneficial to them. Education and athletics are complementary to each other, and it only benefits the school, and does not undermine educational standards when there are high quality athletes on campus.

What does sports have to offer colleges that offsets this trade off? Some students that are interested in going to college are also going to be athletes. A college that has a good sports program is more likely to have positive enrollment. Sports are like additional advertising for the college. The colleges student-athletes are in the paper, they are winning championships, they are constantly in the publics' eye.

This type of publicity reaches future students. It also reaches alumni. People are more likely to get behind a winner than a loser is. What would be lost by un linking big time sports with Colleges? College sports gives something for the students, faculty, community, etc., to rally around.

It provides a sense of pride for where you are and allows everybody to relate to the school in a positive way. Who would a regular Concordia student cheer for if any Cobber team were playing a game in the championships? Most likely it would be the Cobbers even if they didn't like the sport. A sense of pride can only benefit the college. As I said before, sports also attracts future students (enrollment), alumni may donate if they are happy with what they see. If a team were to do well, for example make the final four in hockey, the NCAA gives the program bonus funds that would help support the team next year.

This would result in a decrease in the athletic budget, and money could go elsewhere to benefit the school. Would the proposal accomplish these goals? No, the goal would not be met under the first proposal. Athletes bring so much to the school, and they give up so much of their time.

Yet they are not fully compensated for their efforts. Under proposal two these goals would be accomplished. High quality athletes would still go to colleges to play sports under this proposal, and would probably attract more. They should accomplish these goals. Under proposal three all of the previous benefits that I listed off would be seriously jeopardized if colleges were to lose sports..