Concept Of A National Id Card System example essay topic

The concept of a national ID card has been debated in the United States for over three decades. In the past, the opposition as well as its allies has been strong. As a result of the September 11th terrorist attacks there has been new interest in the concept of national ID cards. While this idea is not all a new, it is closer to becoming more of a reality than ever, gaining the approval by the key members of congress. Currently the Bush Administration objects this renewed idea, however due to the intense emotion from the recent terrorist attacks the nation is closer to the idea than ever before. The idea of a national identity (ID) card seems simple enough.

Take the photographic and alpha-numerical information on our birth certificates, Social Security cards, driver's licenses, and voter registration card; add a bar code, fingerprint, microchip, or other biometric identifier; and display all that information on a neat plastic card no bigger than a credit card. But beneath this smooth surface hides a complex issues and perhaps the greatest threat to personal freedom Americans have ever confronted. A national ID system will o Require Americans to obtain federal government authorization to travel, work, rent or buy housing, obtain medical care, use financial services, and make many purchases. o This federal authorization could be denied for many reasons, including database errors, a suspicious transaction profile, being a deadbeat parent, failure to pay taxes or fines, and any other social control measures Congress wishes to hang on the system. o The system will almost certainly create an outlaw class -- as large as 10 to 20% of the population -- cut off from 'normal' life in America. This outlaw class will sustain the underground economy for the use of future terrorists (and ordinary criminals). (Dority Barbara, p 10) The general questions about national ID cards and concepts involved in the debates, found on the Privacy International website at web faq. html. Can be summarized as below: 1.

Who uses ID cards now? About a hundred countries currently utilize official, compulsory, national IDs for various purposes. These include Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, and Spain. Among the developed countries that don't have such a card are Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, and the United States. Most countries that don't have a national universal card do have a health or social security card or other documents of identity. 2.

What are the primary purposes of ID cards? Race, politics, and religion are often at the heart of older ID systems. Card systems have been instituted to control the threat of insurgents or political extremists, to facilitate religious discrimination, to enforce quota systems, and to allow for social engineering. The FAQ notes: 'At the heart of such plans is a parallel increase in police powers. Even in democratic nations, police retain the right to demand ID on pain of detention. ' 3.

What is the cost of an ID card system? The expense of implementing such a system has been at the forefront of both political and public opposition in a number of countries, including Australia, the Philippines, and the United Kingdom. Cost estimates to create and issue national ID cards in the United States are around $3 billion. 4. Can ID cards assist law enforcement? The usefulness of ID cards to law enforcement has been marginal.

Little evidence has been advanced to demonstrate that they would either reduce the incidence of crime or enhance the success of prosecution. Police authorities in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom have stated their reluctance to administer a compulsory card that might erode relations with the public. Furthermore, forgeries would be inevitable. Obviously, the more an ID card is used, the greater the value placed on it and, consequently, the higher its value to criminal elements. 5. Can ID cards help to control illegal immigration?

The impact of such cards on controlling illegal immigration has been patchy. The use of a card for purposes of checking resident status depends on the police and other officials being given very broad powers to check identity -- either a vastly increased level of constant checking of the entire population or a discriminatory checking procedure that would undoubtedly target minorities (numerous examples are included in the FAQ). 6. Which countries hare rejected proposals for ID cards? The most celebrated campaign against a national ID card occurred just over a decade ago in Australia. In response to proposed legislation, tens of thousands of people took to the streets in opposition, and the government became dangerously split over the issue.

The proposal caused such hostility that it was withdrawn in 1987. A similar proposal was presented in New Zealand a few years later and, under the leadership of the Auckland Council for Civil Liberties, an opposition campaign was formed and the proposal was abandoned. As read above the benefits of a national ID card are highly questionable and have threatened our civil liberties and civil rights. As also discussed by the National ACLU several reasons why a national ID card will neither keep us safe nor free are: The national ID card system will not prevent terrorism. It would not have stopped the September 11 hijackers, for example, pilots of both the hijacked planes had identification documents on them, and were in the country legally.

Terrorists and criminals will continue to be able to obtain the documents needed to get a government ID with by legal and illegal means, such as birth certificates. Also an ID card system will lead to a slippery slope of surveillance and monitoring of citizens. (web) A national ID card system would not protect us from terrorism, but it would create a system of internal passports that would drastically diminish the freedom and privacy of Americans. For example, if a police officer scans your ID card with a pocket barcode reader, would a permanent record created of that check, including the time and your location? The end result could be a nation where citizens' movements inside their own country are monitored and recorded (web). It is also very unlikely that such a system would be limited to its original purpose. Like the original Social Security Act contained strict prohibitions against use of Social Security cards for unrelated purposes, but those prohibitions have been usually ignored over the past 50 years.

A national ID system would threaten the privacy that Americans have always liked and slowly increase the control that government and business have over the citizens. A national ID card system would require creation of a database of all Americans. It is likely that its use would almost certainly expand over time. Law enforcement and other government agencies then will be allowed to link into it, while employers, landlords, credit agencies, mortgage brokers, would begin seeking access, further taking over the privacy that Americans have. National ID cards would also encourage new forms of discrimination and harassment (web).

Rather than eliminating discrimination, a national identity card would promote new forms of discrimination and harassment of anyone who looks or sounds 'foreign. ' Failure to carry a national I.D. card would likely come to be viewed as a reason for search, detention or arrest of minorities. The disgrace and humiliation of constantly having to prove that they are Americans or legal immigrants would ponder heavily on such groups. There I strongly believe that national ID system is not the solution for the problems we are facing today. We have seen before that technological solutions involve risks that should be identified and understood in advance of its use to the greatest extent possible. These risks should be discussed and understood in detail before any decisions regarding its adoption is any form should be made.

Work Cited o Dority, Barbara. "Halt and show your paper!" Humanist. 1 March. 2002, Vol. 62 Issue 2. o M ohl, Jeff. "How public is personal information?" Communications & Mass Media Complete, 1 September 2003, Vol. 91, Issue 7 o Safire, William.

"The Threat of National ID". Kirshner and Mandell 586-88. o web Privacy International web faq. html..