Democracy As The Freedom Of The Press example essay topic

Freedom Through The Press Tears streamed down a broken face That stared to the ground where his father lay At lexington was he dying this day For a battle lost, and a war begun. In a young boys hand, A father lifted his head To look at a son, so confused and afraid Who understood not, for what his father bled Why he would fight, What reason for death. And so as they looked eye to eye The boys innocent lips formed the question, why? Then With inhuman strength, A father lifts dying fingers to sky Pointing to a cloth, flying on high His heart burns like fire, beats like a drum As with his last breath he whispersFREEDOM! 56 men signed a Declaration of Independence, risking their lives. 1000's of men and boys died in the Revolutionary war, And 100's of 1000's more fought and died in wars to come.

56 men created and signed a document of government so perfect it has endured the test of time for over 200 years. Millions of people have given precious support in the fight for equality and against racism. For what reason did many people risk their lives and sacrifice so much? democracy: n. gov. by the people... Their hearts burned brightly with the fires of freedom. We have been handed a Democracy, handed freedom. And now we must either throw this heritage away, by taking it for granted or we must fight our own battle, a battle without bullets or threats, a battle for democracy.

For Freedom isn't Free. We must rule ourselves. It is an almost an obvious fact that in order for us to rule, we need information. If the ruling body does not have information than it can do nothing but act blindly, without direction. This information comes from the media but, in order for the media accomplish this informative purpose, so that we the people can rule ourselves, can have a democracy, and can be free, we must do three things: Redefine democracy, Listen to the press, and control our press. Our first problem is to redefine democracy.

Imagine, a young polish factory worker reads daily in papers that tell him he is free, because the communistic government allows elections. The Press tells him his government has the economy under control. Yet he finds himself spending his time and money standing in line to buy over-priced bread so his babies can live another day. Among the graffiti that began to appear in Poland was an especially significant complaint, Pras a kl amie ('The press lies'). However, free media from countries like the U.S. filtered to the Polish people revealing the truth about their economy.

Once the people heard the truth, they gained power and this lead to the elections of 1989, their first noncommunist Prime Minister in years. Knowledge is power. A free press is still necessary to a democracy even when free elections occur. And having a free media will lead to a more democratic form of gov. Countries get away with being called democracies when, by definition they are not. We must redefine democracy as the Freedom of the press, not the voting in elections.

In the situation of Poland as in countless others, power can be linked directly to information. In early America, whites kept power over their black slaves by forbidding them to learn to read. they held the information and thus the power. In the U.S. we have the information, but to hold it, we must grasp it. Our second problem is hearing the press In the mid 1980's a young journalist in his twenties got the job of his dreams when Time magazine assigned him to cover the Middle East. A month later his feedback of information stopped and there was silence. Frantic officials followed this trail of silence.

It led to Islamic terrorists who bragged they had kidnapped an 'American spy. ' for a year, this young journalist's right hand and foot were chained to a radiator. He was starved and violently beaten many times without purpose. When his release was finally negotiated, he came back to the United States and had enough strength to report on his year in captivity. At times the information being casually read by American citizens over the breakfast table is information sealed by a reporter's blood. That is his part in a free press government. All that is needed now, is that we do ours, read it!

Without information a populace cannot rule. And if a populace cannot rule, then, by definition there is no democracy. We are so proud in United States for being a democracy. But, if we do not stay informed, then by definition we are not. We must grasp the information to hold the power.

I am not, however saying that we should blindly and un doubtingly follow the information of the press, for we have an extra challenge. Our third problem controlling the press. U.C.L.A. sociologist James Q. Wilson points out the curious fact that on city streets where broken windows go unprepared, crime rate soars. Why? the windows make an announcement: Here standards have been broken down, here no authority applies; Come and do what you like without consequences. Today, media has become a gigantic broken window to the world. Portrayal of life without consequences sends the message that chaos reigns. A common claim of the media is that they just show real-life.

Really? Around 350 characters appear on prime time, studies show an average of 7 of these are murdered each night. Ift his rate applied in reality, then in just around 50 days everyone in the entire. S. would be killed. And the last one left could shut off the T.V. Ralph Nader states that 'The media has 2 purposes, to inform, and to entertain, and though the informing part is good, the entertaining part will often focus on the horrid and the vulgar. Perhaps a free media does not always do what we bargained for. Perhaps the media doesn't always mirror life.

Perhaps life might also mirror the media. So, what do we do? Thomas Jefferson, too, wondered about the free media: 'I deplore, the putrid state into which the press has passed, and the vulgar spirit of those who write them. ' Could we not put strong government controls on the media to reduce such vulgarity? In answer, Thomas Jefferson gives us another more simple truth: 'Our Liberty depends on freedom of the press, that cannot be limited without being lost. ' Disturbing elements will never entirely disappear from the media-nor should they-but we must continue to speak out against the wrong, and advocate the good.

Also, the press prints what people read. We cannot simply tell the media we think this isn't right, we musts how them through what we read. And in the future we may even have a chance to enjoy a media as fundamentally decent as the people who live in this great country. In summation, we must first redefine democracy as NOT the freedom to vote, but actually, freedom through the press. Secondly, we must listen and become informed of our media.

And Third, we must control or censor the press through what we read. And for what reason must these things burn like fire in our hearts? Democracy: n. Freedom. Those who have died in the struggle for free media do not die in vain. They die a hero's death in the struggle for democracy.