Due To Heredity And Genes example essay topic
Some that tested out at least 50% due to heredity included a sense of well-being, zest for life; alienation; vulnerability or resistance to stress and fearfulness or risk-seeking. All these factors have to do directly with our personality. Our goals for achieving and future were another thing that tested out to be largely due to heredity and genes. The need to achieve, including ambition and inclination to work hard towards goals is an example of that.
All these points simply prove that there are very many traits in our personality that are due solely to heredity, others only 50%, but either way, genes take a big role in our development. Secondly, we can see just by observing ourselves just how much our parents genes affect our decisions. No matter how much we fight it, our reactions to certain situations are very much like our parents, it can even explain our differences from other people. I ama perfect example.
I am growing up in world were smoking and drinking aren't a 'cool " thing to do, they are just done. Everybody does it, sometimes without even giving it a thought. It has become routine. Both my parents grew up in Christian homes and had values and morals coming out their ears. Neither one of them ever even tried smoking or drinking once.
They had next to no friends who did these things, so that also made it easier for them to deal with the pressure. I have been born into a world where 95% of my friends smoke, drink, or both, I am exposed to it all day constantly, and yet I find that Have not the slightest desire to even try it. I have no problem with my friends doing it, Just wouldn't do it myself. I have asked myself a million times why I am so against it, but Ican not come up with any idea except that my parents beliefs and morals have been passed to me through my genes, which I received from them. This would prove that my personality is mainly formed from heredity, not from my surroundings or nurture as Should put it.
Thirdly, a large experiment was done with twins to test the effect of growing up indifferent environments. The test found that even though the identical twins were raised apart, and therefor should have different personalities, they had very similar reactions and attitudes. This would prove that their personalities would be mainly contrived by nature / heredity, and that nurture / their living environment had very little effect on them. The argument that nurture is the main effecting thing is decent, but weak.
One of the proofs that David Suzuki gave us was that of the fruit fly experiment. He said that the fly's mutated in different heats / temperature levels, thus proving nurture is more effective. I personally think that comparing human beings to feeble fruit-fly's is not a decent, convincing way to show that nurture is the dominant. To prove this he would need a much stronger argument! In conclusion, the three main points of evidence presented should be enough to convince you. Nature has a much more powerful effect on the outcome of our personalities than nurture does.
The facts are clear! I say, out with that old nurture theory and in with the new!