Electoral College Vote example essay topic

There is a lurking danger in the electoral college. This book demonstrates an out of proportion event occuring when electors vote for someone other than their pledged candidate, causing a constitutional catastrophe. I think having the electoral college is a good idea but needs to be more regulated. I found some discrepancies in the book pertaining to certain facts such as the date of the electoral college vote as well as other events that were most likely exaggerated to portray a more chaotic scene. One of the less-known characters proposes a need to fix the system. With this I think that Greenfield is acknowledging that reform of the electoral college will most likely not occur.

An analogy used is when one of the characters describes a scene in which Charlie Chapman (in one of his movies) keeps coming closer to the edge of a cliff on skates and is unaware of the peril e he has put himself into. However, the people in the movie theater aren't frightened at all, yet entertained because they know the obvious signs of danger is just an illusion. So you could conclude that, indeed the electoral college does continue to practice reasonably and that any real danger is just a figment of our imagination. They started the electoral college because there was no mass media to cover elections, however, times have changed and one could argue whether or not we still need to incorporate this system. Do we need the electoral college today? I don't think we do.

We have enough information at our disposal. From the internet to television, radio, and newspaper and magazine publications. It has yet to fail us as far as electing an official. One might argue that in certain elections a popular vote showed one candidate, and the other one ended up winning the electoral vote.

This is true, however, in the most recent case of Bush versus Gore, voting methods in a certain state caused a recount and stirred up a lot of questions as to how the electoral system should function. While the larger states get more of a say than the smaller states (population-wise), I believe this is the way that it should be. Faithless votes are a problem though. An electoral college vote casting against what their constituents vote for.

There aren't really any laws against this. I believe this needs to be changed. If it's not it will be like playing russian roulette ever 4 years with the presidency. In hopes of changing a rule that has been embedded into our constitution, and yet to realize that at the time of the conception of these rules, women couldn't vote, senators weren't chosen by popular vote, and blacks were disenfranchised throughout the south. So with this I conclude, changes need to be taken, and a revised electoral college might be the best idea, along with more regulations regarding any kind of voting fraud by the electorate itself.