Emma Thompson Version Edward example essay topic

The novel Sense and Sensibility was truly a masterpiece. Written by Jane Austen this ironic love story has captured the heart of readers for years. The popularity of Austen as a novelist can now be experienced through film. This book has been adapted into various screenplays, including one by Emma Thompson. Another version of the film was done by the BBC. Perhaps it is the manner in which it was filmed, the character choices or other aspects of the films that make them so different.

Though they are based upon the same novel it is to be sure that the Emma Thompson version will preserve Austen's talent in the world of film. The Emma Thompson version can be well spoken of in that its greatest strength is its ability to preserve and communicate the subtleties of women's life two centuries ago, of human feelings, of passion and reserve, and of wit and irony which are so essential in Austen's books. The movie is, therefore, a rather profound piece of work, which shows a great deal of devotion to it on the part of those involved in its making. Every detail (scenery, costumes, period 'accessories', etc.) is carefully considered and is an integral part of the whole, so one watching it really has the feeling of being carried back to the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries. Though the earlier version done by the BBC is much longer and truer to the novel it is with great pains. The acting is rather stiff as is the dialogue.

The passion and intensity is lacking, perhaps due to the poor camera angles, lighting and set design. It is not to say that it is not an educational version. This lower budget allowed for the full development of the characters in a way a short made for Hollywood film can not. Yet it is not to the taste of many of those in today's audience. One scene in the film in which Marianne and Elinor discuss the prospect of Edward Ferras is handled quite differently in each of the films. In Thompson's Marianne visits Elinor's bedroom as she is settling in for the night to discuss Elinor's true feelings about her time spent with Mr. Ferras.

This scene is exciting in that it shows the girls talking quietly in the night about a rather taboo subject. The idea that Marianne comes to Elinor's bedroom suggests the matter is of an intimate nature, as it surely is. In the BBC version the girls are propped on a see-saw type apparatus. This suggests a type of disagreement between the two while still maintaining an understanding. They shift their weight and ideas back and forth while still supporting wash other. This is a more literal depiction of their feeling about the matter.

Another notable scene is of the conversation between Fanny Dashwood and Mrs. Dashwood as to the high hopes the family has for Edward. In the BBC there more of Fanny's cruelty is revealed through her comments concerning the china and furniture in the house. Mrs. Dashwood's character is developed further when she defends herself against Fanny's malice. Also Mrs. Dashwood attempts to leave the room but is drawn back into her chair with talk of Edward.

In the Emma Thompson version Mrs. Dashwood comments to Fanny about how much the Dashwoods have enjoyed Edward's stay. She is very cold to Fanny after the discussion included in both versions about the Ferras family's high hopes for Edward. The BBC version develops this entire science to a fuller extent but lacks the passion and pain the Thompson version conveys. The scene in which Edward is prompted to read to the Dashwoods is embarrassing for poor Edward no matter which film one watches.

In the Emma Thompson version Edward is attacked by Marianne's frustrated retelling of Edwards reading. Her close proximity and intimate nature make Edwards all the more uncomfortable. Also, the lighting coming only from the fire in this scene is both symbolic and indicative of the time period. The BBC version, as in most scenes is over lit and distant. The characters are seated farther away from each other and a sense of urgency in Marianne is lost. These two films are both vivid depictions of a British classic.

The story of these characters has made it off the pages and onto the screen is a tribute to the great skill Austen had as a writer. Her passionate stories are filled with action, plot twists, and above all love - no film could ask for more than is provided in Austen's novels. Though the versions have various inconsistencies between the two they both represent a novel that has stood the test of time at their core. Books: Cart mell, Deborah. Classics in Film and Fiction Film / fiction ; V. 5. London, Sterling, Va Pluto Press, 2000.21 Mar 2005 web Sin yard.

Filming literature: the art of screen adaptation. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, 1986. Gerald Peary and Roger Shatzkin. The Modern American novel and the movies. New York: Ungar, c 1979.

Articles: Suzanne R. Pucci and James Thompson. Jane Austen and Co. : remaking the past in contemporary culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, c 2003. Linda T roost and Sayre Greenfield.

Jane Austen in Hollywood. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, c 1998 Parr ill. Sue Austen on film and television: a critical study of the adaptations Jefferson, N.C. : McFarland & Co., c 2002. Gina Macdonald and Andrew Macdonald. Jane Austen on screen. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Anke Worker. By a lady: Jane Austen's female archetypes in fiction and film. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press, 1998.