Every Conversation Between Managers And Employees example essay topic

I've learned to, keep my words positive, for words become my behaviors Keep my behaviors positive, for behaviors become my habits Keep my habits positive, because habits become my values Keep my values positive, because values - values become my destiny Mahatma Gandhi INTRODUCTION This paper will focus on what it takes to be a successful coach and motivator in the 21st century and the general characteristics of the coaching process for the future leaders of corporate america. We will also discuss various ways to improved performance through commitment and discuss why some coaching techniques fail to produce the desired results. All coaching is a one-to-one conversation that is, in some way, focused on performance and commitment. However, all coaching is not successful. 'According to Dennis Kinlaw successful coaching is mutual, communicates respect, problem-focused and change-oriented'; (p. 25). BACKGROUND The first phase in becoming a successful coach and motivator is a successful coaching conversation, managers should involve subordinates fully in the communications process.

Successful coaching is not a didactic process - one in which the manager instructs and the employee listens. It should be a process of mutual exploration and discovery. Coaching is a process designed to make the most of what both members know. The manager's main tasking is to ensure that both sets of information are used. In the second phase respect is what employees experience because of what the manager does. Respect results when managers encourage employees to give opinions and feedback during meetings, provide data and to offer objections to what the manager has said.

It is easy for managers to become confused about the subject of respect for employees, especially for problem employees. 'Kinlaw states that many leaders exemplify a common attitude that respect is something that people must earn, a treatment that employees deserve or do not deserve'; (p. 27). In truth, communicating respect for the employees as an individual or group is an essential aspect of coaching conversations if they are to improve performance and develop commitment to the organization. Supervisors leading a group must never lose sight of the fact that their job is to manage performance of the group and to ensure commitment to superior performance. It does not serve supervisors purpose to foster resentment, or to block the development of others. In the third phase, problem focus, 'Pool states a problem is not necessarily something negative, it is only the difference between what is and what is desired to be'; (p. 271).

In successful coaching, managers should stay focused on what can be described objectively: plans, actions, and events. Your main objective is to fix performance, not to fix individuals. In the final phase, we often learn from the past, but we cannot alter it. Managers who are successful coaches focus on what can be changed or improved. 'According to Julio Olalla, a manager should always approach a coaching session with the expectation that performance and commitment will be reinforced or improved because of the conversation.

The past should be used only to help employees to understand how to improve the future'; (p. 16). The purpose of coaching is not to help employees fail more effectively or despair about their shortcomings, but to find ways to help employees to perform better at their professional or competence level. The most effective and efficient way for managers to improve their coaching practices is to learn how to manage the two processes of solving people problems and improving performance. According to Fournies, the coaching process is a five step process to redirect a subordinate's behavior to solve a performance problem: to get the subordinate to stop doing what he shouldn't be doing or to start doing what he should be doing (p. 135). The first step is to get agreement a problem exists, this is the most critical step in the coaching process, and usually where most managers fail in their efforts to eliminate performance problems. Managers fail here because they bypass it assuming the subordinate knows a problem exists.

'David Calabria states even more difficult to believe, though true, is that subordinates may know they are doing something wrong, but they don't know it's a problem'; (p. 75). The next step in the coaching process is to mutually discuss alternative solutions. You as the manager and the subordinate together will identify as many alternative solutions as may be necessary to solve the problem. He points out a valuable opinion when he states 'because you are dealing with behavior, it is necessary to specify those changes in behavior that are needed to influence the outcome or result'; (p. 75). He states 'unfortunately, we have many workers who try harder, but are still doing the wrong thing'; . That is, they are doing more of something, but what they are doing will not result in solving the problem.

'Unless you specify what trying harder is, the only result you may achieve is people walking around with clenched fists, tight buttocks, and grinding teeth. It will certainly give them a feeling of trying harder, but they will not be doing anything to change the outcome'; (p. 76). The next step is to gain mutual agreement on which alternatives will be acted upon to solve the problem. Calabria states 'a common practice managers follow in their problem-solving efforts is to combine the selection of alternatives with the listing or discovery of alternatives, these are two clearly separate functions; combine them inhibits the optimum achievement of either'; (p. 77). You should not only mutually agree on which alternatives will be acted upon, but should also specify when the action will take place. You must identify what will be done and when.

He states an appropriate closing response would be to thank the subordinate for agreeing to solve the problem, and to specify a time when you will meet again (p. 78). The next step in the coaching process is to follow up to insure that agreed upon action has been taken. It never ceases to amaze me that naval officers will take the time to chew on subordinates about a problem, but will not take the time to insure the agreed upon action has been taken. What usually happens is that the manager is overwhelmed by the subordinate's promise to change.

The subordinate has confessed his mistakes and expressed the right amount of humility and concern; therefore, the manager assumes the change will take place. This sound reasonable too most because we are not dealing with children; we have two mature (sometimes educated) and experienced people dealing on a face-to-face basis. We have to assume at least in the military there is still some honor and integrity left in the world, so we take the subordinate at face value and assume that what is expected to happen will somehow magical occur. Too often we discover as managers, one month down the road, things are just as bad as they were in spite of the subordinate's promises.

Cote and Trudel point out sometimes the subordinate does change initially and, because the boss does not follow up, there is no recognition of this change and, therefore, no reinforcement to support the change. So the subordinate or group returns to the inappropriate behavior (p. 4). In coaching when you follow up and observe that a problem individual has improved, you must recognize that improvements by saying something like, 'I see you have corrected that problem we discussed, and I really appreciate your efforts on that. If you continue your efforts, pretty soon it will go away all together, keep up the good work'; .

The last step in the coaching process is 'recognize any achievement when it occurs'; , has the greatest potential to sustain improvements in performance. Roberta Maynard sees the timeliness of your recognition and rewards is of critical importance to its influence on sustaining improvement. 'The sooner recognition (reinforcement) occurs after the actual performance achievement, the greater is its influence. The longer the period of time between the actual performance and the occurrence of the reinforcement, the less influence it has'; (p. 11).

If someone corrects a performance problem today it is more effective for you to tell him about it this week, than to give him / her a raise six months from now and tell them at that time how much you appreciated it. If you do not recognize a subordinate's change from unsatisfactory to satisfactory performance, you will not sustain the change; and you will have wasted your time and energy. Maynard states only when you have achieved a sustained change, have you completed the coaching process. 'Two-thirds of the people of the world go to bed starving every night and that's a crying shame, but 99.9 percent of the population goes to bed every night starving for recognition, it's such a simple thing to give'; (Fournies, p. 2). If one of a manager's primary tasks is to create commitment and focus in employees, and then the manager must have a clear idea of just what commitment is and what contributes to it. 'Kinlaw states the four supports of commitment are clarity about goals and values, employee competencies that allow success, degree of influence that employees have and the expressed appreciation given to employees or groups for their contributions'; (p. 10).

Formal and strategic planning has become a common activity in most organizations. 'According to William Lucas strategic plan ning does as least two things: It clarifies what the organization intends to be and it clarifies what the organization intends to be like'; (p. 14). For group members to have commitment to a project the group must have a focus. Values bring clarity if they are real.

Managers cannot talk about quality and then, every time there is a crunch, reinforce the fact that schedules and quotas are the true drivers. Lucas states commitment is evidenced in the purposeful focused behavior of employees who are willing to make sacrifices in order to ensure quality work or success. This focus can be created only if manager's build clarify about their work group's purpose and its value (p. 15). Coaching as a one-to-one interaction between managers and employees, is a primary strategy for building clarity toward the future.

People develop commitment toward what they believe they can do well. People or groups do not like to fail. They will try to avoid the things that they think they cannot do. If managers want commitment they must make sure that employees have the ability and willingness to be successful in their jobs. There are two elements that managers must address in building employee competence (Olalla and Echeverria, p. 17). First they must ensure that their employees have the knowledge, skills, and experience to perform their tasks, and they must ensure that their employees have the confidence to perform their tasks.

My work with the government has convinced me that managers do not always place improving the competencies of their subordinates high on their list of priorities or responsibilities. Experience has shown me that most leaders or managers even object to the idea that they are responsible for developing employees: 'They say such things as: It's their responsibility to develop themselves'; ; nobody made it easy for me, so why should it be easy for them. No one can seriously quarrel with the idea that individuals have final responsibility to develop themselves. But not to see the development of people as a fundamental management responsibility is shortsighted and foolish (McNerney, p. 2). Saul Gellerman states each of us feels a great deal more committed, willing to do our best, when we are tasked with jobs that we know we can do well or that we know we can learn to do well (p. 128). Saul also states managers who help employees to increase their knowledge, skill, and experience also are building employee commitment - the key to sustained, superior performance (p. 130).

Influence is the third part of commitment. Employees do not perform nearly as well when they are consistently denied any input in their jobs and are expected to follow unquestionably the decisions of their leaders. 'Managers who deny employees any influence get the end result they deserve. These results range from boredom to passive resistance or even sabotage'; (Fournies, p. 14). Many employees end up doing what they are told to do, but they do it exactly and they do no more. Extending influence to employees can happen in a number of ways.

It can happen through 'talk to the boss'; programs or it can take the shape of formal employee suggestion programs or may be extended through the informal and ongoing conversations that managers have with individuals or groups. Kinlaw states that innovation is the process of developing and implementing new ideas. Managers involve subordinates and co-workers in the process of innovation through the following: Inputting - encouraging them to present new ideas. Decision making - permitting them to help decide which ideas will be tested or developed.

Implementing - helping them to test and gain support for new ideas (p. 87). Coaching is the key for extending the influence of employees. In their coaching conversations with employees, managers permit employees actively to identify their own needs and to help shape the ways these needs are met (Fournies, p. 16). The fourth leg that supports commitment is appreciation.

One of my most untested theories is that if you want to know how people feel about their organizations and their work, check the bathrooms. William R. Lucas once said, ' a tough-minded'; manager said to me once: 'Where I come from, the appreciation that you get for doing a good job is that you get to keep you job'; (p. 14). In today's world, this simply does not work. Commitment to superior performance is a function of clarity, competence, influence, and appreciation.

People work best when they believe that what they do matters to someone else - especially their bosses. According to Roger Schwarz there are three criteria's that must be met to have an effective group: The services that the group delivers or the products it makes meet or exceed the performance standards of the people who receive it, use it, or review it. The processes and structures used to carry out the work maintain or enhance the capability of members to work together on subsequent group tasks. The group experience, on balance, satisfies rather than frustrates the personal needs of group members (p. 21)... Schwarz also describes a problem solving model that work groups can use to identify and solve problems. Define the problem.

Establish criteria for evaluating solutions. Identify root causes. Generate alternative solutions. Evaluate alternative solutions. Select the best solution. Develop an action plan.

Implement the action plan. Evaluate outcomes and the process (p. 159). Before we end this paper lets discussion why do some coaching techniques fail to produce the desired results? In the past, talking to today's military leaders and managers about the difficulties that they have faced in coaching, they seem to believe that it was the employee's 'fault.

' ; As he continues to discussion his 'problem child'; I develop an image of an employee involved in a coaching conversation with no manager present. Coaching is an interaction, whether supervisors admit it or not, managers influence the outcomes of every coaching session - for better or worse. 'Coaching does not fail because of poorly endowed and poorly motivated employees. It can fail because of poorly trained managers'; (Kinlaw, p. 33).

CONCLUSION Coaching is the process by which managers and leaders stay in touch with their subordinates. All the walking around in the world will not help managers to get the best from their employees unless managers are walking around as coaches. My boss once said, 'coaching is eyeball-to-eyeball management'; . Every conversation between managers and employees is potentially a coaching conversation. It is a chance to clarify goals, priorities, and standards of performance. It is a chance to reaffirm and reinforce the group's core values.

It is a chance to hear ideas and to involve employees in the processes of planning and problem solving. More important than all the rest, it is a chance to say 'thank you. ' ; My study and research has conclude that coaching is not an option for managers. It is a large part of their basic managerial functions. It is clear that superior managers and superior military leaders engage in coaching - and they do it well. The good news for all is that managers can learn the set of management practices that we call coaching.

Bibliography

Barry, John M. 'Performance Management: Case Study. ' ; Journal of Environmental Health, Vol. 60, No. 4, Nov 1997, p.
35. Calabria, David C. 'When companies give, Employees give back. ' ; Personnel Journal, Vol. 74, No. 4, Apr 1995, p.
75. Cote, Jean and Pierre Trudel. 'The Coaching Model. ' ; Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 1, Mar 1995, p.
1. Fournies, Ferdinand F. (1993).
Coaching for Improved Work Performance: Liberty Hall Press. Gellerman, Saul W. (1992).
Motivation in the Real World: A Dutton Book Gibson, Virginia M. 'Organizations Must Adapt to Employee's Changing Needs. ' ; HR Focus, Vol. 71, No. 3, Mar 1994, p.
7. Hackett, Thomas J. 'Giving Teams a Tune-up: Reviving Tired Work Employees. ' ; HR Focus, Vol. 74, No. 10, Nov 1997, p.
11 Kinlaw, Dennis C. (1993).
Coaching for Commitment: Pfeiffer and Company Lucas, William R. 'Performance Coaching: Now and For the Future. ' ; HR Focus, Vol. 74, No. 1, Jan 1994, p.
13. Maynard, Roberta. 'Fishing For Creative Ways to Make Workers Happy. ' ; Nations Business Journal, Vol. 84, No. 12, Dec 1996, p.
10. McNerney, Donald J. 'Employee Motivation: Creating a Motivated Workforce. ' ; HR Focus, Vol. 73, No. 8, Aug 1996, p.
1. Me rina, Ann. 'Coaching Each Other. ' ; NEA Today, Vol. 10, No. 4, Nov 1993, p.
3 Olalla, Julio and Rafael Echeverris. 'Management by Coaching. ' ; HR Focus, Vol. 73, No. 1, Jan 1996, p.
16. Pascale, Richard and Linda Gioia. 'Changing the Way we Change. ' ; Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75, No. 6, Nov-Dec 1997, p.
126. Pool, Steven W. 'The Relationship of Job Satisfaction with Substitutes of Leadership, Leadership Behavior, and Work Motivation. ' ; The Journal of Psychology, Vol. 131, No. 3, May 1997, p.
271. Rodgers, Buck. (1987).
Getting the Best Out of Yourself and Others: Harper and Row Publishers. Saucier, Anne and Mary Maris. 'Fixing a Broken System: Performance Management Systems. ' ; HR Focus, Vol. 75, No. 13, Mar 1998, p.
1. Schwarz, Roger M. 'The Skilled Facilitator: Practical Wisdom for Developing Effective Groups. ' ; Jossey-Bass Publishers. Thomas, David L. 'Encouragement: The Key to Effective Management. ' ; Trusts and Estates Review, Vol. 134, No. 10, Oct 1995, p.