Executive Branch And The Judicial Branch example essay topic

1. T. "Dub" Wise was robbed and killed on April 18, 1983 in his house in Houston, Texas. Burdine and Wise had a homosexual relationship and lived together for three months. Calvin Burdine admitted that he was there when W.T. Wise was killed and he also said that he had known that a robbery was planned. But evidence point to accomplice Douglas McCreight as the one who did the murder. Interesting is that Douglas McCreight pleaded guilty of murder.

Calvin Burdine pleaded not guilty, but in trial the jury found him guilty. Calvin Burdine was sentenced to death, Douglas McCreight was released on parole after 8 years in prison The U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) on Monday rejected an appeal by Texas, which wanted to execute a death row inmate even though his lawyer slept repeatedly during his 1984 murder trial in Houston. The justices let stand a U.S. appeals court ruling that Calvin Burdine deserved a new trial because his lawyer dozed off frequently enough and for long enough stretches to deprive him of his constitutional right to effective legal assistance. Texas wanted to carry out the execution. Even though the court-appointed lawyer was 'repeatedly unconscious' during the trial, Texas argued it did not affect the outcome, which ended with Burdine being found guilty and sentenced to die for fatally stabbing his gay lover. 2.

This case clearly has nothing to do with homosexuality, more so than equality and justice. This case goes to show that justice is not always served through the legal system. It illustrates that every one is not always offered a fair trial. I believe they did the right thing in letting Burdine be retried because his lawyer kept falling asleep. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty but this case reveals that once society has formed their own opinion about you, or his lawyer in this case, there's is nothing anyone can do to help in the legal system.

That's sad because if Burdine is innocent, he had no voice to speak up for him and this could be another case of an innocent man being executed. 3. Public policy is any type of actual or proposed government action to address social problems. There are three branches of our government: legislative, executive, and judicial.

The actions that are taken by members of these three branches are public policies. In elementary school, you learned that the legislative branch makes the laws, the executive enforces them, and the judicial interprets them. 4. Criminal Law- the body of law dealing with crimes and their punishments Civil Law- the body of laws established by a state or nation for its own regulation Misdemeanor- crime less serious than a felony Felony- a serious crime such as murder or arson Judicial Review- review by a court of law of actions of a government official or entity or of some other legally appointed person or body or the review by an appellate court of the decision of a trial court Judicial Activism- an interpretation of the U.S. constitution holding that the spirit of the times and the needs of the nation can legitimately influence judicial decisions (particularly decisions of the Supreme Court) Injunction case and desist order- a judicial remedy issued in order to prohibit a party from doing or continuing to do a certain activity; 'injunction were formerly obtained by writ but now by a judicial order 5. Redistributive policy is probably the most contentious of the domestic policies.

This policy involves the public the most. Bureaucracies are instrumental here because they are the one who do the redistributing. Presidents will pass the buck to bureaucrats, who will be responsible for the promulgating the rules and regulations to implement these policies. Examples of this type of policy include social security, welfare, but don't forget corporations benefit as well!

Distributive Policy involves some decisions by gov. without regard to limited resources. This type of policy is very individual in its impact. An example of this policy would be pork-barrel legislation by congress. 6. The position of the United States courts in the nation's system of government is not difficult to understand when that system is viewed as a whole.

The government of the United States is a dual one -- federal (national) and state. The federal government has three separate branches: the legislative branch (Congress), the executive branch (the President, administrative agencies, and military services), and the judicial branch (the courts). The powers of the U.S. courts are limited first to the powers granted to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution and second to judicial powers. The courts cannot exercise powers granted by the Constitution to the legislative branch or the executive branch of the federal government. The Constitution ensures the judicial branch's equality with and independence from the legislative and executive branches.

Although federal judges are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate and the funds for the operation of the courts are appropriated by Congress, the independence of the U.S. courts is provided for in three respects: Under the Constitution, these courts can be called upon to exercise only judicial powers and to perform only judicial work. Judicial powers and judicial work involve the application and interpretation of the law in the decision of real differences; that is, in the language of the Constitution, the decision of cases and controversies. The courts cannot be called upon to make laws, which is the function of the legislative branch, or be expected to enforce and execute laws, which is the function of the executive branch. 7. By creating a substantial amount of written laws. If rules and laws are written, this will eliminate a lot of personal opinions in the courts.

Everyone must follow the same rules and policies is they are written in an official document.! 5.