Few Protesters In Source C example essay topic

Question 1 Sharpeville 1) In what ways do sources A+B agree about the events in Sharpeville on the morning of 21 stop March Source A is a primary source written by Humphery Tyler a Journalist from a south African magazine. Source bis a secondary source, it is a report to an English newspaper, a day after theshooting. The two sources agree that armored cars Saracens were present as well as police cars. Source A says thatthe re was three Saracens armored cars present earlier in the day while. B says there was a dozen Saracens. Source A big gray police car and three Saracens.

Source B About a dozen Saracens. The two source also agree that the police were well armed. Source B police reinforcements were sent there. Source A: There were plenty of police, too, well armed. A constable shoved his rifle against my window shield. The two sources both agree and say that the events happened in Sharpeville.

Source B starts the report with Around Sharpeville, as too does source A we went into Sharpeville the back way. Source A fails to mention the number ofprotesters there. Just the vague description many people. Though in source The account says that the police station was virtually besieged by thousands of Africans.

Tyler describes the day as A Sunday outing. He describes the crowd as grinning and cheerful. He says that children were present waving at the police men Two even waved back. Source Does not mention this or anything about the protesters emotions. Source B said trouble was expected.

If trouble was expected why were kids present, smiling and being happy. This does not show any signs of trouble and the women and children present suggests that the Africans did not expect trouble. Source Describes in the report a shooting i the morning which one African was killed and another seriously wounded. This was not mentioned in the source A. Source A describes theprotesters Shouting Pan African saying Iz we Let hu which means our land. The yare described as many people. While source B writes that they were virtually besieged by thousand's of Afrikaans shouting Africa, Africa.

This is a much more aggressive chant than our land, which was described in source A. This makes the crowd look hostile. And with the thousands of them makes them sound bad: aggressive. Overall there are far more disagreements than agreements. I feel that Source B, the report published inthe English newspaper, was trying to justify their actions more than give description of the events of the morning March 21st. Question 2 Sharpeville What are the similarities and differences between the two sources description of the events in Sharpville onthe morning of 21st March The sources are both photographic, source C was in taken in the morning of march 21st. Source D was taken on the same day but later at midday.

Both photos are of thecrowds of protesters at Sharpville. Source C and D both show thecrowds of African protesters and boths how vehicles, these are the main similarities. Source C is a picture taken behind the police and facing the protesters. Two policemen are sitting on to pof a Saracen in the open looking relaxed. Another policemen is walking past them. Three Saracen armored cars are mentioned in source A of Tylers account.

Driving behind a big gray police car and three Saracen armored cars. Though in the picture I can only see one, this shows how photos are limited in getting the full picture and can leave things out. The police look very calm one even has his arms folded. The flaps on the armored car are open and the vehicle appears to be stationary. As it can be hard to tell if the actual photo is a accurate reflection of the events shown. Photographic evidence is the same a san eyewitness, but the accuracy of the picture can be changed.

Things can be blocked out, appearances of people can be altered. There is know way of knowing that the car is switched off, it might be on and moving towards the protesters. We cannot see any weapons in the picture, the only clue to the police being armed in the photo, are big straps across their backs. Source A backs this in saying Police, too, well armed Shoved his rifle against my wind-shield The police are acting cautiously to have such a big cars present and large police force their.

Humphery Tyler describes what he saw Plenty of police. This could be to intimidate the protesters, or to show that the police are ready for any violent protesters. In source C protesters a refacing the camera and the police. They look calm and relaxed in the warm mornings heat. Source A describes how the protesters were behaving, earlier inthe day They were grinning and cheerful Sunday outing. Their are no signs in the photograph of protesters fearing attack or looking for trouble with thepolice.

Tylers account in source A describes the atmosphere between police and protesters Some kids waved to the police sitting on the Saracens and two ofthe policemen waved back. The protesters look a long distance from the police and the vehicle, this is creating tension as the police appear to be armed, while the protesters do not. There are limitations with photographic evidence, objects can be blocked out and thing not appear to be what they seem. There are a small crowd gathered in front of the police no more than two rows big. The protesters have no banners or written signs of protest. They show no emotions or actions of protest.

This could be because it is in the morning when not many protesters are their yet. In the crowd I cannot see any white people. But the picture is in black and white and hard to distinguish features of the protesters in the background. Though they are some women in the crowd, this is backed up by source E another extract from Tylers account Hundreds of women rushed pastus I feel that the message give nout shows the police to have the crowds of protesters under their control.

Thecrowds shows no signs of feeling or active protest. There is also no signs of violence from the police or the protesters. I think that the crowd is very far back, this might be because they feel wary of the weapons that the police carry. Source D is a picture taken from within a crowd of protesters at midday 21st of March, the someday as source C. Just like source C the picture contains a vehicle. But instead of it looking stationary in front of the crowd, it looks as though it is passing it. The vehicle is a large car.

Their are no signs to tell in the photograph that it is a police car. Unlike in source C where it was clear by the presence of the police, this source has know visible police, in or around the car that I can see. This is because protesters hand is blocking the driver, and the passenger side of the car is black with no detail. But this could be the car from the council, mentioned in source, A motor car from the council, which went through earlier in the morning, emerged a wreck and the people inside were injured. The vehicle does not appear to be wrecked or damaged. The crowd are all drawn tothe vehicle crowding around it, bunched up to one another on both sides of the vehicle with their thumbs up pointing tothe driver of the car.

The crowd is much more active than in source C the crowd look exited and full of life. The caption explains that The thumbs up sign wasa symbol of protest This looks to be in the picture a nonviolent form of protest. As the majority have their thumbs up facing the car. Source D is closer to the time of the shooting as the police look like they have lost control of theprotesters. The mood of the protest has changed dramatically, there is now more feeling shown on peoples faces, and emotions in their body language. The sources in many ways are opposite to one another.

Source C shows the protesters to be a long way away from the police vehicles and the photographer. Unlike source D where theprotesters are close to the car and the photographer taking the picture is inside the crowd. Their are few protesters in source C compared to source D where the protesters could rightfully be described as hounding the car. In both of the sources the police appear to have some authority because their in vehicles and the crowds ofprotesters are on foot. The two main similarities of the crowds are that the iris no violence and that they are unarmed. Overall there are more differences between the two sources.

The pictures portray the moods of protesters at Sharpville throughout the day and how their emotions change. Question 3 How reliable is source F asevidence of what happened Explain your answer Sources F is a secondary source written by the Anglican Bishop of Johannesburg, Ambrose Reeves. The statements were formed a few days after the shooting. They were collected by him under oath while visiting and speaking to the wounded. It say that Witnesses| were in separate wards of the hospital and could not have talked before making their statements.

The information can be trusted because the bishop is under oath to God, if he we reto break this and lie he would be breaking his religion and promise to God. Allthe people that he interviewed were there at Sharpeville and have the injuries to prove it. His first sentence starts with All the witnesses. Source E is written by Humphery Tyler and is a primary source as he was there at the time.

The sources an extract from Tylers account We heard the chatter of a machine gun, then another, then another. Source F of the Bishops interviews read that the witnesses said The police lined up out side the police station and all fired together Tylers account backs this up. The Bishop said that Allthe statements agree that the crowd was not armed, even with sticks. Also witnesses said they were Unarmed and did not approach the police station with violent intentions. This is backed up by source D a photographic source of thecrowds at Sharpeville.

The picture is taken deep within the crowd and doesnt show any of the crowd to be armed. This is a justified statement as Tyler the only journalist there said that I saw no weapons, afterwards when I studied the photographs of the death scene The Bishop says that Nearly all those being treated in hospital had been shot in the back. This is backed up with the photograph taken by Tylers Photographer. The source G shows theprotesters running from the police station, with a police man in the distance standing on top of a Saracen. In source E Tyler describes this to be a policeman firing his stem gun into the crowd He was swinging it around in a wide arc from his hip as though he were panning a movie camera In both source E and F both statements agree with one another that their was no warning given to the crowds of protesters. I heard no warning to the crowd police did not attempt to give any warning before opening fire.

With both of these quotes agreeing with one another suggests that the statement is reliable. Source F becomes more reliable with the evidence given in sources E, D, and G as they all agree withthe statements collected by the wounded. Even though it is a secondary source and the Bishop is a antiapartheid campaigner, it is made more reliable as source when cross-examined with the other sources. Question 4 Sharpeville Which is the more useful asevidence of what happened at Sharpville, Source E or Source G Both the sources are primary sources and both are useful for giving evidence at Sharpeville. Source E is written account from Humphery Tyler, who was the only journalist present in Sharpville that day. He describes in detail what he saw before and after theshooting.

Source G is a photographic source taken by the photographer with Tyler in source E. Source E is useful asevidence as it describes situation and circumstances in detail. For instance Emotions, feelings and what he heard and saw. He captures the atmosphere well Chatter of machine guns then another, then another this is what caused the protesters to flee. Hundreds of women rushed past us little boy had an old coat which he held behind his head thinking that it might save him from the bullets.

Tyler turns his attention to the women and children to capture the innocence of sight he saw. This vivid description is backed by source G. Its hows clearly a women and a child running to the sides of the camera, with many following behind. Tyler describes how thepolice were firing into the crowd. Policemen was standing on top of a Saracen Firing his stem gun into the crowd. This is backed once again in source G, there is a policeman standing above the crowds of protesters, as they ran fromthe police station. In Source G I am able to make out the policemen standing onthe Platform which I am assuming is the Saracen, that was mentioned in Tylers account.

He writes in his account that the police said that the crowd we rearmed with ferocious weapons. He next explains what he saw of the crowd before and after the shooting, I saw no weapons And afterwards when I studied the photographs of the death scene I saw only shoes, hats and a few bicycles left among the bodies. In the picture of the protesters running towards the camera no weapons of and kind can be seen not even umbrellas which are shown in Source D, as Tyler describes in his account they just left everything in order to flee. Through this source the evidence is able to be seen inthe minds eye. Source G is useful asevidence because it does not have to be described and at a glance the reader can determine for themselves what is happening.

Also people believe more what they see than what their told and holds more reliability with them. Although photographic evidence is the same as an eyewitness, the accuracy of the picture can be changed by the developer. Areas of the picture can be lightened or darkened. Objects can be made bigger or smaller.

So their is an area of uncertainty inthe clarity of pictures. The picture African protesters running from the police station situated behind them, towards the camera. Which is backed up with Tylers account Hundreds of women rushed pastus Hundreds of kids were running to. The picture is taken with a wide angle lens and captures the scale of the people fleeing. The photograph links with what is in Tylers account, so I dont think the picture was altered. In order to get the full use out of these too sources you have to put the to types of information together in order to achieve the maximum knowledge of what happened.

Using the picture to shows the real life visual images, while the written source to bring out the details missed in the picture. Unlike the written sources the advantage of using photographic evidence are that the person looking at the source can make their own mind up.