First Sign Of Corruption In The Commission example essay topic

Abstract: The Corruption Scandal of the European Commission and its possible effects on the institutional balance and the question of legitimacy I. Defining Corruption The first chapter is an attempt to define corruption. It is important to divide overlapping and complicated terms such as corruption, scandal and fraud. Corruption is defined as an illegal transaction, where both actors benefit from their special position in the market or the government. Scandal is the public reaction to allegations of corruption and thus it is interconnected with the issue of legitimacy. Fraud, however is a purely criminal category. The European Commission is a multicultural and multinational institution of the European Union so it is vital to take into account the cultural relativity of the meaning of corruption.

Corruption can only be defined within a specific society and at a specific time. This culture specific aspect of corruption is reflected in the division of so called black, white and grey corruption. Black corruption in a given society is a reprimanded behaviour both by the public and by experts. It is a well defined area of the un tolerated behaviour. White corruption on the other hand is the behaviour that is tolerated by the public in a given society and not looked upon as mis behaviour. Grey corruption is the area in between, which is tolerated by a part of the society, while seen as corruption by the other part.

It is also important to realize the dynamics of the definition of corruption, as it changes with geography or time from black to grey to white corruption (or vic a versa). Corruption scandals are often only a sign of this change in the public perception of corruption. These cultural differences can be observed in the member states of the European Union. There is a dividing line on the imaginary corruption scale between the Northern protestant countries (Denmark being the least corrupt) and the Southern catholic countries (with Italy at the lowest end of the corruption scale). The corruption in the Mediterranean countries can be identified along the lines of amoral familiaris m, and the constant use of mediators. The cause of this southern type of corruption is the relative weakness of the central government and the inefficiency of the.

These mediators came to be the only effective channels between central governments and peripheries. They were the seeds of organized crime of the mafia for example, which integrated into the central government. In the northern part of the continent there is more emphasis on the notions of incompatibility and the conflict of interest. There are problems however around the financing of political parties. II. The Organization of the European Commission The Commission is at the heart of the Union.

It has a very important role in formulating policies, initiating legislation, overseeing implementation, make administrative decisions. The Commission had a great impact on the politics of the Communities from the earliest times. The ambitions of the Commission to gain more influence in European decision-making caused frequent conflict with the Council of Ministers, which saw the strengthening of the supranational Commission as a main threat to the of the member states. This conflict was accentuated at the Luxembourg crisis in 1965, which was the greatest institutional crisis of the Community.

The crisis was caused by De Gaulle's resistance of the Commission's proposal of introducing majority voting in the Council instead of unanimity. The French President paralysed the working of the Community by practicing the 'empty chair' politics, boykott ing the Council of Ministers. The crisis was solved by he Luxembourg compromise, which kept the veto of the member states. The first sign of corruption in the Commission was the 1979 report of the Court of Auditors, which accused the commissioners of using the community funds for private purposes and scr unitized the Commission of the reckless spending of he resources. The European Commission can be divided to a political and an administrative arm.

The political arm is the College of Commissioners. The College of Commissioners is responsible to provide political leadership for the Commission. It is a collegiate body of 20 commissioners nominated by the member states. Commissioners must act independently and represent the general interest of the Community. Commissioners are usually high calibre politicians from the member states, many being prime ministers or senior ministers prior to their post on the European Commissioners. They act as an informal channel between the Community and the political elite of the member states.

The commissioners are surrounded there personal team of 6-8 senior advisors, the so called cabinets. The influence of the cabinets is a contagious issue. The directorates often see them as an obstacle of communication between the department and the commissioner. Cabinets are also accused of being of the same nationality as the commissioner. The administrative arm of the Commission consists of the permanent and the temporary staff. The permanent staff is about 15,000 people in size.

They are nationals of the Member states who get on a closed list of appointees to the Commission through the concours. This competitive exam however is just a first step. To get appointment often depends just as much on who they know. There is another practice of filling in permanent posts, known as.

There is an age limit of 32 years to get appointment in the Commission. Senior staff with temporary appointment however can get permanent posts via closed examinations. These practices can cause a lot of tension. Within the Commission there are also informal network of nationalities, which can influence senior appointments.

An anthropological research of he Commission also showed the cultural differences in identifying invalidity, alcoholism or corruption. The Commission is highly dependent on external expertise as well. This is provided by temporary appointments and the complicated system of committees surrounding the Commission, known as comit ology. These committees are very heterogeneous and contribute to the complication of decision making mechanisms. In the case of the European Commission we can identify two 'constituencies', the Member states and the citizens. This causes an internal conflict, as the two interests often do not coincide.

In the European Commission there are traits of intergovernmental ism. Both the commissioners and the staff articulates national interests at Commu.