Foreword 2 1 Funcionalidade 2 1 example essay topic

1. INTRODUCTION 2. TEORIZAC'ES ABOUT THE FOREWORD 2.1 FUNCIONALIDADE 2.1. 1 Demonstrative Function 2.1. 2 Function S inest " e sica 2.1. 3 Pertinent Function 2.1.

4 Function Topol " ogi ca 2.1. 5 Function Did asc " alice 2.2 THE PROBLEM FROM THE AUTHORSHIP 2.3 THE FOREWORD METAPO " E TICO 2.3. 1 General Vision 2.3. 2 Vision in the Brazilian Literature 3. THE FOREWORDS OF TUTAM " EIA 3.1 Funcionalidade Practical 3.2 A Her men^e utica from the Alegria 4. CONCLUSION 5.

BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. INTRODUCTION The forewords have a value of achievement that himself can judge autonomous, regarding the work in that they are inserted, healthy, for times, determinadores authentic of as the author carries out his condicionamentos basics for the efetivac~ao from the work of art. However, that need of illustrate, of teorizac sweats output is not imperative for the author, to the contrary one, the need of a metalinguagem that determines an ambi^en cia and justify the purposes from the output is only in the dependence of the author. To manifest his literary rank of conscience, the author appeals to the foreword in order to he determine: the knowledge intentional deposited in the literary stuff; the cast of techniques ah atlantes; his practical procedures; his function of achievement in the all or in part from the work. Traditionally, the foreword manteve itself in functions done not delineate by the Literary Theory. What intended, in this work, the formulation went and denomination of those functions, doing with that the forewords - before marginalized from the Theory - integrated the literary studies of more more systematic way.

It found himself, also, an adaptation from the theory presented to several literary forewords, specially to the "Forewords" of Tutam " eia (Third Stories) of Jo~ao Guitar~aes Rose. 2. TEORIZAC'ES ABOUT THE FOREWORD THE idea that the word "foreword" transmits, by the 'e timo to that is bound, cannot coincide with the use that is fact to the reality that he represents. The foreword (of the Latin = praefatio) would assign that that was done to introduce somewhat that comes after itself. its relation of proximity with the prologue (of the Greek = = ᠃ saw Latin = prolog u) is of nature sin on " i mica, having in mind that both the words will want assign to same introductory function. Indistinctly, therefore, the two concepts melt in a traditional assignment from the same function that, alone historicamente, and of remote way, there would be of distinguish him the use. It is truth that had a distinction of the profane one and of the lit " urgico that had repercussions in the use of those words.

It used himself, with severity - Latin norms - the term "foreword" for those books whose content included a religious matter of character. That distinction, however, believe more become attached to the rep " udi o from the cosmo vis~ao heathen of the hele nismo and from the latini zac~ao theological than to a significant distinction sem^antica. Dess arte, there would be of prevail to plural idade significant from the idea and not the abstention preconceituosa of a "I left pris". The denotation of the term "foreword" himself many " em for beyond the centuries, his connotation, however, he feels been adapted to in proportion to the his use and of the circumstances of the use. This it signifies that the foreword is that that says, not obst ante itself distin ga of the circumstances of its use, you have as: in the legal, rhetorical areas, mon ogr " a fica, dramatics and literary. Privately, in the literary area, the foreword is involved with several other purposes that go beyond the simple task of introduce a literary work.

From the simplicity of its function denotative and traditional the foreword fog e for others routes, arriving to even it configure itself as synthesis of a way of conceive the literary art. That should be noticeable, having in mind a detour of the traditional rhetorical behavior for another of fei c~ao metapo " e tica.