Gacys Adult Behavior example essay topic

1,476 words
The question is: How could a man considered by so many to be an upstanding citizen actually be the murderer of 33 young men To this day, nobody really knows for sure. Within this paper I intend to examine Gacys life through the lens of three psychological theories in order to give some insight into some of the factors that may of caused Gacy to act as he did. John Wayne Gacy Jr. was born on March 17, 1942 in Chicago Illinois to John and Marion Gacy. For the first eleven years of his life, John Jr. attended a local catholic school along with his two sisters, Joanne and Karen. Gacy was considered by his teachers to be an average student with no outstanding qualities except for the fact that he tended to be compulsively neat (Linedecker, 1980). In high school, Gacy did not perform as well academically.

He ended up attending four different high schools but he never completed his senior year. This might of been due to the abusive relationship Gacy had with his father. The entire Gacy family fell victim to John seniors drunken brutality. He beat his wife, terrorized his daughters, and constantly abused and belittled John Jr. Throughout the abuse, though, John Jr. managed to have a strong relationship with his mother (Linedecker, 1980).

After a few years of working as a janitor, Gacy decided to go back to school. He enrolled at Northwestern Business College, and within a year, earned his degree. After graduation he was offered a job with the Nunn-Bush shoe company, and within a year he was promoted and moved to Springfield Illinois. Things were looking good for Gacy at this point of his life. While living in Springfield, Gacy married one of his co-workers, Marlyn n Myers. He also became involved in the local chapter of the Jaycees.

Gacy loved to be noticed, whic was probably why he was so active in the organization that was dedicated to improving the community. He was so active, in fact, that within a year of belonging to the organization he was elected vice president. Gacy and his wife eventually packed up and moved to Waterloo Iowa, were he was offered a job by his father-in-law working for a Kentucky Fried Chicken franchise. Everything seemed to be going great for Gacy until he was arrested for allegedly committing sodomy with a teenage boy. He was convicted and sentenced to ten years in prison, where he spent only three and was eventually released on probation. During this time, his wife divorced him and took custody of their two children.

After prison, Gacy moved back to Chicago and into a small house located at 8213 West Summerdale Avenue. To the people that lived around him, Gacy was considered to be a good neighbor. He was always throwing lavish parties at which he spared no expense. Once again, things seemed to be going Gacys way. He got married again, started his own contracting company, and once again became involved in the local Jaycees. In reality, though, Gacy was not at all what he seemed.

While living at 8213 West Summerdale Avenue, Gacy secretly committed 33 murders that eventually shocked the nation and made him the worst serial killer in American history. He preyed on young teenage boys from all walks of life. Some worked for him at his contracting company and others were young male prostitutes working the streets of Chicago. Gacy would lure these young men into his home by promising them drugs and then proceed to sexually molest and murder them. Gacy was eventually caught in 1978 after he abducted and murdered his last victim, a young boy named Robert Priest.

Priests mother was waiting for her son outside the pharmacy he worked at when Robert ran out and told her he would be out in a minute. He first had to talk to a man about a contracting job for the summer. Robert was never seen again. Roberts mother contacted the police and told them about the contractor her son spoke to. The police eventually arrived at Gacys house to ask him some questions. When they entered, they noticed the unmistakable odor of dead bodies (Linedecker, 1980).

They eventually searched the house and found 33 dead bodies buried in a crawl space under the house. Gacy was immediately arrested and sent to jail to await trial. He was eventually convicted of 33 counts of murder and sentenced to death. The execution took place on May 10, 1994 by means of lethal injection. Probably one of the best ways to understand how a man could commit such heinous crimes is to analyze his life using different psychological theories and paradigms. One paradigm, Eysenck's Three-Factor Model, breaks down personality into three factors: extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism.

Each of these three major factors can be broken down again into more specific traits ( Cloninger, 1996). Most people, when measured, will usually score high on some traits and low on others. Gacy, on the other hand, seems to score fairly high on most of them. Traits that accompany extraversion, such as sociability, dominance, and sensation seeking are traits he would score particularly high on.

He exhibited extreme sociability through his various parties, successful business relationships, and through his work with the Jaycees. He also exhibited extreme dominance and sensation seeking through his molestation of young men. Gacy also scores high on most traits that accompany neuroticism, especially irrationality and moodiness. For obvious reasons, Gacy could be considered an extremely irrational man. He also was very moody.

His wife once told a story of how one minute he was throwing furniture in a fit of rage and the next minute he was back to his normal self (Linedecker, 1980). It seems strange that Gacy would score high on the traits that fall under psychoticism such as impulsiveness, unempatheticness, and anti-social ness, considering the fact that he also scores high on extraversion traits, which are basically opposites of psychoticism traits. One could argue that, in a way, Gacy was two different people. To his friends and neighbors, he was an extremely ext averted man, but in reality he was a social deviate. Another psychological theory that could be used to explain Gacys behavior is Freuds psychoanalytic theory. In his theory, Freud believed that childhood experiences were the main determinants of adult behavior.

He came up with four different stages of development, all of which affect behavior. Freuds stages of development consist of the oral, anal, phallic, and latency periods. It is possible for an individual to become fixated at any one of these stages depending on how stringent ones parents are during each stage. According to Freuds theory, Gacys adult behavior was probably caused by aversive events that took place during the anal and phallic stages of Gacys development.

During his entire life, Gacy was considered by many to be compulsively neat and orderly. Even when he buried the bodies of his victims under his house, he made sure they were all lined up symmetrically with each other (Linedecker, 1980). This would indicate that he was fixated during the anal stage of development. During this stage, if ones parents are too regimented during toilet training, one can become overly neat. During the phallic stage, the child learns what it is to be male or female by identifying with the same sex parent. Gacy never really identified with his father due to John seniors abusive behavior towards his son.

One could argue that this was the reason for Gacys abusive behavior as an adult or even that it was the cause of his homosexual tendencies. A third and final psychological theory that could be used to interpret Gacys behavior would be the Social Learning Theory. According to this theory, a boy learns to be masculine by being rewarded for masculine behavior and punished for engaging in feminine acts. As a child, Gacys father never rewarded him. He was, though, constantly punished, but never for any rational reason. Once again, one could argue that this contributed to Gacys homosexual tendencies as an adult.

John Wayne Gacy Jr. was a man that many considered to be normal. In reality, though, nothing could be further from the truth. By using the lens of psychological theories, we come closer to understanding what drove a seemingly normal man to commit such unthinkable crimes.

Bibliography

1. Cloninger, S. (1996).
Personality: Descriptions, Dynamics, and Development. New York: W.H. Freeman And Company. Linedecker, C. (1980).