Game Of Golf From A Belletristic Approach example essay topic
The belletristic movement begun in the late 1600's. The belletristic scholars incorporated many of its ideals from various ancients and modernists. From Aristotle they derived a communication model comprised of source, message, and receiver; an understanding of ethical, logical, and pathetic proof; a recognition of the effect of the occasion on a speakers choice of material and development of themes; and an appreciation for perspicuity in style (Golden 75). The belletristic scholars also used Cicero and Quintilian's ideals that there are five arts (invention, disposition, style, memory, and delivery) which make up rhetoric. Finally, from Longinus they learned the value of combining rhetoric and poetics into a single, coherent system; and the meaning and significance of taste and sublimity (Golden 75). Now that we have discussed the general background on how the belletristic approach came about, I would like to introduce Hugh Blair.
Hugh Blair is the one who helped develop the belletristic approach. Blair was one of the first modern writers to use rhetoric as a form of criticism. So he would not limit himself, Blair was part neoclassicist, part rationalist, part epistemologist, and part romanticist. Taste was an important concept that Blair believed would influence the direction of rhetoric. Blair defined taste as the power of receiving pleasure from the beauties of nature or art (Golden 81). Blair said you can tell if something is of high taste because of the pleasure it will evoke.
Blair also says Taste like the body responds to exercise. You can improve your sense of taste as an audience through exercise. To improve your taste, go experience the best version of the art form that you can (Golden 81). Taking Blair advice on taste, I went and watched the best player in golf, Tiger Woods.
Like in any form of art or sport, if you have practiced hard enough and are self disciplined you will succeed, and this is exactly what Tiger has done. By the age of two the boy could look at a grown mans swing and understand it (look, Daddy, he would say, that man has a reverse pivot! ); that by three he was beating 10-year olds; that by five he was signing autographs (because he couldnt write script, he printed his name in block letters); that by six hed already had two holes in one (Garrity 39). This experience has lead him to be one of the most fun golfers to watch play the sport. This experience has also evoked a pleasure in the audience when watching him play.
According to the belletristic approach this pleasure is due to watching the best version of the art. Being a weekend golfer, not only can I appreciate Tigers skills from this standpoint, but I also can appreciate them from his performance against other professionals. I now can understand what Blair is saying when he says taste responds to exercise. Prior to watching Tiger play golf my standards for the professional golfer were completely different and the game itself did not evoke near as much pleasure as it does now. Blair says that taste comes from sublime. Sublime is a power that comes by beauty or from beauty, usually talking about a natural phenomenon (Dr. Williams 3-7).
Sublime is the power that comes from the beauty of discourse (Dr. Williams 3-7). This is exactly what came about when his mother whos half Thai, a quarter Chinese, and a quarter white had a child with his father whos quarter American Indian, a quarter Chinese and half black. Tiger Woods is a phenomenon in the fact that his golf game had developed so early in his life, leading him to be the best to play the game. Hugh Blair also said that ones style should be looked at when critiquing someone from a belletristic approach. Hugh defines style as perspicuity is the greatest quality of style, meaning nothing in the message obscures its meaning, absolutely pure. Style is so good and clear that you can understand what it is talking about (Dr. Williams 3-7).
There are two aspects of Tiger Woods that I relate to when critiquing his style. First of all, I look at his golf swing and his performance on the course. He has the strongest and most fundamentally sound golf swing on the tour and when combined with his frame of mind he becomes the most dominant player on the tour. Tigers style was helped developed by his father, Earl, who had served in Vietnam and understood the importance of self discipline. Earl would hold debriefings with Tiger after tournaments. Earl wanted Tiger to develop a coldness in his attitude, it was this that helped Earl get through Vietnam.
This coldness was an intense concentration on whatever Tiger was doing. Once at a tournament a marshals walkie-talkie went off at volume 10 out of 10 during Tigers backswing. Tiger admitted later that he never heard it (Scott 50). This is the clarity that Tiger beholds in his mind on the course, which creates a unique style. As a spectator, I can certainly see the amount of focus Tiger holds.
He has won seven out of the last nine tournaments he has played in and is known for his comeback abilities. I have a great amount of respect for him when critiquing his style because of his ability to maintain focus and performance during clutch situations. When critiquing taste, Tiger evokes much pleasure throughout the nation considering the TV ratings for last the tournament dominated its competition. Tigers competition on TV was the Los Angeles Lakers against the Sacramento Kings (two big market NBA teams).
Hugh Blair introduced an interesting perspective on critiquing any form of art. Critiquing the game of golf from a belletristic approach has been an enjoyable experience.