Good Play example essay topic

Critique of Arms and the Man The play took place during the time period of the Russian revolution, I believe. I m not entirely sure, but it was Bulgaria and Syria fighting. The setting took place entirely in the house of the Petkoff house; a Bulgarian major's house and family. The plot was a pretty basic, straightforward concept. It's in the middle of the war, and fighting is occurring right outside the house. Catherine, a daughter is about to go to sleep, when a soldier bursts into her room through the balcony window.

He is a Swiss fighter for her enemy, Syria. For some reason, she decides to help him, and hide him away in her room. He leaves safely and isn t heard of again until the war subsequently ends shortly afterward. Major Petkoff comes home with Sergius Saran off-Catherine's fianc. Then we find out that they do not really love each other. Sergius is really in love with the maid, Luka.

Then things get tricky, as the Swiss fighter, Bluntschli, comes back to the house to return the jacket he escaped the house wearing. Eventually, everyone finds out that he was the one that hid in the house. We also find out that Bluntschli and Catherine are in love. It all works out nice a pretty, when everyone is on the same page, and the parents learn of Bluntschli's fortune. I think the meaning of the play is to follow your feelings. If you love someone, it doesn t matter who it is, how much money they have, whatever, you just have to follow your heart.

The director showed how they were so close to missing each other, because they were all too concerned about how it looked and the status of one another. He adequately portrayed how close and miserable they all would have been, if everything had not worked out perfectly. I was initially impressed with the set, and only more so amazed as the production moved along, and I saw the intricacies and detail of it. The set was very realistic, clearly showing and abiding by the time the play took place.

In addition, it was amazing to see the crew change sets during the intermissions. It looked like it took a great deal of effort to create such a magnificent set. The scenery went along with everything of the time period. They made it even more realistic with one prop, which was the cigarettes and pipes. Much more effective than pretending to smoke.

The costumes and makeup was wonderful again. Sergius mustache looked fake, but Bluntschli's was legitimate, and Nicola's shaved head made him look much more old and bald. I saw nothing noticeably bad with the lighting, so that's what counts. One thing that bothered me however, was that I could see movement and people behind the set. I had the seat to the far left first row, and I guess due to my placement, I could see a small amount of movement of people to the right of the set.

I am no expert on acting, but I thought the actors and actresses were superb. I felt every character fit his / her part. They did a really good job dealing with the accents. The pauses were used very effectively also. They knew how to wait for a laugh or whatnot.

They made the play very humorous. I was very impressed. Everything flowed well, and seemed to work. The pace suited the play; I got what I wanted without squirming my chair or wanting more from the play. I enjoyed Arms and the Man very much so. I felt it was a very good play, which kept me entertained throughout the entire production.

Everything wrapped up very nicely at the end, and gave me a very good warm feeling with the conclusion. It was a feel-good play, which didn t really make you think a great deal, but was mainly for entertainment purposes. In short, Arms and the Man was play very well done, which gave everyone in the audience a good feeling as the curtains were drawn.