Great Amount Of Influence Over Congress Members example essay topic
"Lobbyist seek to bring about the passage or defeat of legislative bills and to influence congress, often using large sums of money in a variety of ways to influence legislative outcomes" (APD). I feel that lobbyists have a great deal of influence within congress because they may have direct connections with congress members in high positions. Through PACs, organizations can pool campaign contributions from group members and donates those funds to candidates for political office. Personally, I feel that PACs have the most influence over congress because their campaign contributions speak louder than the constituent's voices.
"Constituents are people who live and vote in a government officials district or state" (JBG). In my opinion, I feel that constituents have power over congress members because they have the power to vote them in or out of office. On the other hand, I feel that voting constituents have the least amount of influence over congress members, who strive for money contributions in order to, run their political campaigns, compared to donors and PACs. Gallegos 2 Wayne, Lasser, Miller and others tend to agree that lobbyists and PACs have a great amount of influence over congress members because they may have direct connections and give campaign contributions. Recently, the airlines industry convinced congress to pass a $15 billion aid package it needs in order to survive. "The airlines had plenty of resources to draw on: 27 in-houses lobbyists, augmented by lobbyists from 42 Washington firms, including former White House aides and transportation secretaries, as well as the airlines own chief executives and corporate board members, whom all are well known in the halls of congress" (Wayne, NYT, 10/01/01.
Lasser, American Politics, 1999. Miller, The American Prospect, 10/23/00. Geiger, Washington Post, 11/4-10/91.) I feel that money is an important factor to lobbyist whose connection with people at the top is crucial. Representative Lloyd Doggett agrees that in most cases, "All the lobbying is focused on a handful of people at the top" (Wayne, NYT, 10/01/01). It seems to me that major corporations have an easier time connecting with congress members because they have more money to contribute during election campaigns compared to poor, uneducated, and unorganized citizen groups. I feel that the congress is fully aware of their dependency of campaign contributions.
I believe that it's also about making profit from bills, which may be a reason why more airline and oil bills passed unlike environmental bills. "Senator Hutchison, senates top recipient of contributions from the oil industry, helped pass a provision that would save the oil industry at least hundreds of millions of dollars-and costs the taxpayers ditto" (Ivins, SFC, 5/6/98). Others may argue that, "PACs increase the ordinary American's voice in our political system" (Geiger, WP, 11-4-10/91). However, I don't feel its fair that only the voices of people who give campaign contributions are heard. Their voices outweigh the voice of the poor people who can't afford to contribute cash donations. It is vital that for the system to be equal all groups must have equal representation and participation in the political system.
I believe in the majoritarian model of democracy because I feel the people should have the power over the government.