Half Of Baseball Players Use Steroids example essay topic

I'm pretty sure you all have engaged in some sort of athletic competition that could be classified as a sport. If you can say that you have, most of you could not keep up with some of the more naturally athletically gifted people you were competing with or against... If you are sitting there remembering that feeling of being inadequate, thinking back when your parents told you all that mattered is that you tried your best, was a huge crock. No matter how hard you tried you failed, you felt like the scum of the earth, and everyone was laughing at you.

You let everyone down, if this has ever happened to you. You are not alone you share the same feelings of many amateur and professional athletes who feel that the only way to reach their goals, to be in the limelight, to make the winning score, they need that edge. The edge that puts them ahead of the rest, to be on a level that most can only dream of achieving. The edge some athletes use is steroids. There are many types of steroids. To many to name, so they are talked about in groups.

These groups are as follows: Stimulants, Narcotic Analgesics, Cannabinoids, Anabolic Agents, Peptide Hormones, Beta-2 Agonists, Masking Agents, and Clucocorticosteroids The most commonly used is called Anabolic steroids. A anabolic steroid is a chemical similar to the male hormone testosterone. Steroids are taken by pill, or injection. They enter the bloodstream they are distributed to organs and muscle all over the body. After reaching the organs the steroids surround individual cells in the organ, and then pass through the cell membranes to enter the cytoplasm of the cells Once in the cytoplasm, the steroids bind to specific receptors and then enter the nucleus of the cells. The steroid-receptor complex is then able to alter the functioning of the genetic material and stimulate the production of new proteins.

It is these proteins that carry out the effects of the steroids. The types of proteins and the effects vary depending on the specific organ involved. Steroids are able to alter the functioning of many organs, including the liver, kidneys, heart, and brain. They can also have a profound effect on reproductive organs and hormones. Steroids were first experimented with in the 1860 by Brown-Sequard, although he did not know what he was using. He would draw fluids from the testicles of animals and would inject these fluids into himself and his patients.

He said that it made him stronger and he could run faster and jump higher. Today athletes are using steroids knowing the risks. Recently baseball has become the center of attention as learned in a recent article by ESPN writer Dan Patrick- The estimate of the number of players on steroids in MLB rises and falls more than the Dow Jones. In his recent interview in Sports Illustrated, former NL MVP Ken Caminiti unintentionally lit a match -- and it's spreading like wildfire.

There isn't a big enough fire extinguisher to put it out. Caminiti has acknowledged his problems with substance abuse, and as part of his recovery process he's been told to come forward and be honest. He didn't do the SI interview to get sympathy. He did it to talk about life after baseball, and he said the steroid issue was just touched upon.

Now it's the focal point of an ongoing debate. Caminiti acknowledged 'dabbling' in steroids; he said he began taking them in 1996 for medicinal purposes (coincidentally or not, the year he won the MVP). He also saw other players take steroids. But he's not interested in bringing others down.

Despite being quoted in SI as saying that half of baseball players use steroids, Caminiti told me his statements were misconstrued and the actual number is far fewer than 50 percent. Unlike Jose Canseco's plan for a tell-all book, there was no intent to expose others behind Caminiti's SI interview. Perhaps now that he sees the repercussions of his statements, he's backpedaling. But Caminiti's only ax to grind is with himself. He's not blaming anyone else for his mistakes. He admits he cheated.

And now he just wants to disappear. I couldn't help but feel sympathy for Caminiti. Curt Schilling, however, isn't as sympathetic. Arizona's All-Star pitcher believes the bottom line is that Caminiti took steroids. But Schilling thinks only about 15 percent of MLB players use.

Even if it's only 10 percent, is it 10 percent too many? So the witch hunt has begun. It's a shame, with everything that Major League Baseball has had to deal with lately (labor issues, contraction, payroll, etc. ). The last thing baseball needs is another black mark on the sport. The use and abuse of steroids are not new, so why now?

Why the sudden surge of attention? The knee-jerk reaction might be to blame the media. Baseball insiders might hope that if it isn't talked about, it will just go away. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Schilling said pitchers take steroids, too. He knows pitchers who threw 91 mph one year and then showed up the next season throwing 95-96 mph after using steroids.

Schilling also quipped that anyone who looks at his body knows he does not take steroids. Schilling acknowledged it would be tempting, given the money involved, to use steroids if you know that your employer doesn't care and can't test you. Because of the cash -- and knowing that others use and may be more talented without the help of a performance-enhancing drug -- what would prevent a player from taking steroids? But Schilling pointed out that you have to look yourself in the mirror at the end of the day.

He hoped that personal morals and ethics would come into play. With reported levels of steroid use varying widely, it's clear there's no accurate way to estimate usage. Speculation and association play a large role in those estimations. The only fact is that conjecture and speculation won't get at the truth. Form all of the opinions and assumptions you want, folks, but the truth is we " ll never know. The obvious answer is to introduce mandatory testing, as they do in the minors.

But who's the judge and jury? Whose responsibility is it to clean up this mess? And what can be done? Just like with Olympic drug testing, if an athlete is smart enough, he just needs to stay one step ahead of the law. Testing in MLB could begin today. But who would run these tests?

Would they be hired by the owners or the players? In either case, the likelihood of the big-name, top-dollar stars getting called out is slim. There are further questions. Can testing detect all steroids? What about the player who takes steroids in the offseason only to test clean during the season? If a player goes on the disabled list with a mysterious injury (one potential side effect of steroid use), should management have the right to test him?

All ethical questions. And they won't go away. Former Oakland Raiders great Lyle Aldado died in pain and in vain. He withered away due to steroid use, but it didn't stop anyone in the NFL from taking steroids.

Meanwhile, MLB has had its head in the sand -- for far too long -- and must find a way to police itself. If players are using an illegal substance that can land them in jail, baseball should care. If baseball cares about other illegal substances, it should address steroid use. I took a drug test to work at ESPN. Every baseball player should have nothing to hide. So despite all the questions raised by testing, this begs one final question: Why not take the test?