Hal's Loyalty example essay topic

An exploration of the presentation of the theme of Kingship in Henry IV Part One. The idea of Kingship is explored through many different characters, skills and respects in Henry 4th part one. In many respects it can be viewed as an analysis of the qualities needed to be a successful king. Shakespeare shows many different characters who each possess some or each of the following qualities; leadership, politics, loyalty, heroism, and majesty. It could be argued that Shakespeare thinks a successful king possess all of these qualities.

At the time of the Elizabethans, there were many issues to consider. The problems concerning who was going to succeed Queen Elizabeth were huge, as in that period; 'Divine Right' was considered the uppermost priority. The queen was also under threat of a Spanish war. This was all contributing to a time of turmoil not as a halcyon time as it is more widely interpreted to be. What methods Shakespeare used whist displaying Kingship were to use various models of Kingship. The King (Henry 4th) Hotspur, Prince Hal, Falstaff, Worcester, and Glendower are these models.

These characters all have different qualities of Kingship, and it could be suggested that the ideal King would possess all the qualities already mentioned. We see leadership qualities in Falstaff whilst planning and perusing the robbery of the travelers. Although these qualities could be laughed at due to Falstaff's humorous nature, they are qualities of leadership portrayed by Shakespeare in a funny way. This adds light relief to the play. The strength of Falstaff's character could be compared to Prince Hal. We see a strong, vibrant leader in Prince Hal who wasn't afraid to lead his men to battle.

Compared to Falstaff, who stayed on the periphery of the battle drinking " sack". This warrior image of Hal is seen in Hotspur as his main quality from the very beginning. Although a good warrior, Hotspur is not a good leader. He leads by example.

This can be seen in his final speech to his troop " Than I that have not well the gift of tongue, Can lift your blood up with persuasion". To contrast Hal and Hotspur in the role of leadership it is clear they have very different methods. Hal leads by influence and respect whereas, Hotspur expects people to follow him. This conflict in personality can also be seen in their pursuit of loyalty for themselves.

Hal's loyalty can be seen through both his father and Falstaff. Also, Hal's persuasive manner inspires loyalty from others, by being sociable to every man whether they are rich, old, or otherwise. This is the complete opposite to Hotspur who can't deal with anyone other than people like himself as they annoy him". Out of my grief and impatience Answered neglect ingly I know not what" This doesn't inspire people's confidence to follow him as a king, as they may not have or be able to gain the respect they want. With Hal, they could get this respect, as Hal has been in contact with people from all walks of life. Hal is also loyal to his father.

This is shown when he chooses to take his fathers side in the rebellion instead of that of his friends". I would I could Quit all the offences with a clear excuse" This quote shows the transformation of Price Hal, aswell as the loyalty he shows to his father. Hal's transformation was a swift and shocking one to both his people and especially his father. Hal had been seen by all people from all walks of life, something that his father King Henry IV deemed ridiculous and the reason for Richard II losing the throne. :.