Hamlet Plans Out An Opportunity For Claudius example essay topic

William Shakespeare, perhaps the greatest playwright of all time, authored a number of works consisting of sonnets, comedies, and tragedies. In his brilliant career, Shakespeare created literary works of art. What makes Shakespeare unlike any other writer of his time, is his ability to organize a realistic plot, manage themes, and develop characters within his works (Nordling). As well, Shakespeare's ability to provoke feeling and reaction to his writing is also what sets him apart from other common writers.

Of his works, Hamlet is perhaps the most studied and most interesting of the collected tragedies. In this play, many question the actions of the characters and particularly the actions of Hamlet. The answer to: 'Why does Hamlet delay in avenging the death of his father?' is one that is not easy to identify. Possible conclusions include the role of others in Hamlet, Hamlet's religious nature, or even Hamlet's tragic flaw as a hero in Hamlet. It is often argued that Hamlet was written as a tragedy of the human spirit (Nighan). Others argue that it is a tragedy of destiny, or the hero.

In every hero's quest for the truth, none is more apparent than that of Hamlet. This search for truth is born of the passing of young Hamlet's father. It is at the critical moment of revelation by the Ghost of Hamlet that young Hamlet is destined for revenge. Although the concept of revenge may be considered an evil justice, it is evident that the importance lay within the context of carrying out the fate. The question arises of 'Why did Hamlet not take revenge sooner upon Claudius?' The how and when of this vengeance becomes critical in the development of Hamlet the character. To fully comprehend the true essence of Hamlet as a son, a discoverer, and a destroyer, one must analyze each individual characteristic as revealed by Shakespeare (Nordling).

It was not enough that Shakespeare just wrote the play, he also emphasized the character's thoughts and emotions through the soliloquies. In fact, the whole idea of drama is to feel, to an extent, what the character feels. However, in Hamlet, the use of the soliloquy offers the audience a gateway into the minds of the characters, and in this case it provides various reasons why Hamlet delays in exacting revenge. The depth of thought possessed by characters is easily measured by how effortlessly a reader can relate to what is being said or done. While the script is fictional, the story within the play itself becomes believable. Undoubtedly, Hamlet is a man of action.

(Eliot) Why then, does Hamlet require five Acts to finally prove this concept? A number of different possibilities exist. The single, most important of these possibilities are Hamlet's internal conflicts within his own mind, body, and soul. From the first Act, Hamlet displays a substantial amount of concern for his mother. '. ..

Why, she would hang on him / As if increase of appetite had grown / By what it fed on; and yet, within a month / Let me not think; Frailty, thy name is woman!' Clearly, Hamlet's concern for the Queen, his mother, is genuine. Within this thought, Hamlet realized the severity of his mother's actions while also attempting to rationalize her mentality so that he may understand, and perhaps, cope with the untimely nature of the Queen's marriage to Claudius. Understandably, Hamlet is disturbed. (Nighan) Gertrude causes such confusion in Hamlet that throughout the play, he constantly wondered how it could be possible that events would turn out the way that they had. This unfortunate turn of events is often questioned since Gertrude, the same woman who had instilled a great sense of religion in Hamlet, contradicts such a value that proves 'Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

' (Nordling) While regarding this as the principal means for Hamlet's frustration, it is not until seeing a spirit form that Hamlet decided to seek the truth, and ultimately, exact revenge. After envisioning the apparition, Hamlet sets out to avenge the death of his father, yet he is unclear as to the actual fulfillment of the revenge. Thus, Hamlet acknowledges that as a man of duty, justice, and honor, he must act upon the request of his late father. The concept of 'antic disposition' is the feigned madness that Hamlet uses as his first step toward the revenge (Nighan). Carl O. Nordling states clearly, Here, we have a clear indication that Hamlet is a thinker, and bares a calculating intellect. It is this intellect that critics question in Hamlet's status as a hero, simply because it reinforced the theory that Hamlet embodied a critical and tragic flaw within his nature.

At no time was any doubt of Claudius' guilt ever discussed between Hamlet and the Ghost with relation to King Hamlet's death. Young Hamlet was quick to regard these charges as truth. Yet, at the time Hamlet knew his course, but had the option to seek it out on his own terms. 'The time is out of joint. O cursed spite, That ever I was born to set it right!' (Shakespeare 189) Hamlet decides that the murder of Claudius can only be justified if it is done at the right moment. This is important to consider since Hamlet is heir to the throne that Claudius did hold in Denmark.

How then, if Hamlet killed Claudius is it possible that Hamlet could be able to explain a murder of such huge proportions. There is a pressing danger in attempting to convince people that their King, a man of such divine rank, is anything less than that. The only character in Hamlet that did such a thing was Laertes. Furthermore, this incident only took place as a result of mistaken identity; an assumption that Polonium died at the hands of Claudius, when in reality, Hamlet was responsible. This is the first indication that Hamlet is a man of action. It is, revealed that Claudius was in no way responsible for the death of Laertes' father, and consequently, allowing Laertes and Claudius to conspire against Hamlet.

One area of significance in the delay of Claudius' guilt is the burden of proof. Surprisingly, this concept of 'needing evidence' existed in its earliest form through Shakespeare's Hamlet. In today's society, charges of the murderous sort are somewhat protected by the principle that all people are innocent until proven guilty. In Shakespeare's time however, it is interesting to note that someone like Hamlet exercised this ideal, seemingly a victim to the crime himself, and to the Elizabethan era in which this crime is evident (Burton). Brilliantly, Hamlet plans out an opportunity for Claudius to indicate some guilt, therefore allowing his conscience to freely carry out the murder of Claudius. 'Well, my lord.

If he steal ought the whilst this play is playing, / And 'scape detecting, I will pay the theft. (Shakespeare 90) As the plot rises in action, Hamlet discovers enough through the play within Hamlet, known as The Mousetrap. Upon the completion of The Mousetrap, Claudius' guilt is quite obvious. Seemingly successful, Hamlet once again hesitates to kill. His concern was the people and the Entire State of Denmark in addition to his own clarification in the probability that the Ghost was real. (Burton) As a result of the overwhelming suggestion in The Mousetrap, Claudius, ironically a man of justice himself, seeks forgiveness from God.

Hamlet overhears Claudius admit in his own words, the guilt in that which King Claudius lived. 'O, my offence is rank, it smells to heaven / A brother's murder. / My Stronger guilt defeats my strong intent, / May one be pardoned and retain the offence?' (Shakespeare 40-47) It is possible to argue that Hamlet had accumulated enough solid evidence to prosecute the King at this point, but because of procrastinating, his intent became stronger than his will to act (Burton). There was really very little that stood in the way of Hamlet's revenge. Aside from a few guards, and minor characters in Hamlet, the task of putting an end to Claudius should have been no more difficult than killing trespassers. Keeping this in mind, revenge is not always justice served (Nordling).

Now might I do it pat, now he is praying; / And now I'll don't. And so he goes to heaven, / And so am I revenged. That would be scann'd: / A villain kills my father, and for that, / I, his sole son, do this same villain send / To heaven. (Shakespeare 73-78) The character of a tragic hero is not always easy to understand. Nevertheless, the greatest conclusion that may be draw from Hamlet is a simple one: behave according to truth, and justice should prevail. 'Of thinking too precisely on the event / A thought which, quartered, hath but one part wisdom / And ever three parts coward -- I do not know Why yet I live to say, 'this thing's to do', / Sith I have cause, and will, and strength, and means, / To do't...

' (Shakespeare 41-46) Rational thought and compassion are what make Hamlet a hero. Unfortunately, thought and inability to act on impulse, are the factors in creating the tragedy in Hamlet. In today's society and its values, Hamlet continues to be a contribution to ideals of value and morality. This story of a man and his downfalls should be considered an asset to the better of society, and a lesson learned in compassion for other.

Bibliography

Burton, Philip. "The Sole Voice". 'Character Portraits from Shakespeare. ' The Dial Press, New York. January 6, 2005.
web Eliot, T.S., 'Hamlet and His Problems', The Athenaeum, No. 4665, London 1919.
January 6, 2005 Nighan, Raymond.
HAMLET AND THE DAEMONS: AN INQUIRY INTO THE NATURE OF THE GHOST AND ITS MISSION". Shakespeare. January 6, 2005 Nordling, Carl.
Why does Hamlet tarry?" Shakespeare: Who wrote Hamlet and why? January 6, 2005.
Shakespeare, William. "Hamlet". Hamlet. January 6, 2005.