Hitler Later Declared If The French example essay topic

HUMAN 410 PROFESSOR: Dexter Christian Question 2323. With dictators, nothing succeeds like success. That observation, by Adolf Hitler, is not as trite as it sounds. Hitler was referring to his own successful re militarization of the Rhineland in 1936. Before he moved into the Rhineland, Hitler was securely 'in his box'. Pursuant to the Versailles Treaty and the Locarno pact of 1926, Germany had been forced to keep this territory demilitarized as a guarantee against renewed aggression; furthermore, an unguarded Rhineland left Germany naked to a French attack.

From the German point of view, this was not 'fair'; it violated German sovereignty. But it was the price Germany paid for invading France and the low countries in 1914. And it was the lid on the box that contained Hitler's grand strategic ambition. In March of 1936 Hitler decided to roll the dice and take an extremely perilous venture (Goff.

235). Hitler's reason for moving into the Rhineland was a ratification one month earlier of a mutual assistance pact between France and Russia that he felt was aimed at Germany (Medlicott 84-90,110). Hitler cited the mutual non-aggression pact as violating and therefore invalidating the Locarno Treaty (Winton 1). Hitler was weak. Germany was still struggling through the Depression and Germany's armed forces were still in pitiful shape, hopelessly outgunned by the French. Had the French army responded in force to the re militarization, had it simply marched into the Rhineland, Hitler would have had to retreat.

Hitler later declared 'If the French had then marched into the Rhineland, we would have had to withdraw with our tails between our legs' (Goff 236). A retreat on the German part would have signified collapse, possibly the collapse of Hitler's rule. However, Hitler felt the French would be disinclined and not act upon his move... and he was right. The militarization of the Rhineland was a direct blow to French security. It rendered worthless the promises of military aid by France to her eastern European allies Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and Romania if any of them were attacked by Germany (Medlicott 84-90,110). There were numerous reasons why France and Great Britain did not retaliate, but the most prevalent are as follows: 1. a genuine hatred for war by those who remembered WWI.

This was accompanied by a non-enthusiastic attitude toward heavy military spending. 2. a, perhaps, resentful attitude by Britain toward Germany because they felt they were dealt with too harshly at Versailles; therefore their desire for revision was understandable. 3. Hitler's ability to make some allied statesmen believe that he was a reasonable man with mere understandable goals. 4. fear of further Japanese and Italian aggression. This would enable France and Britain to have one primary focus, Germany. 5. fear that communism would spread. If Hitler were overthrown some thought that a Communist government might follow (Goff 236).

After Hitler had made his precarious move in the Rhineland the French government immediately declared the German occupation a hostile act. It clearly violated the Locarno Treaty and therefore authorized its signatories to use force to expel the German units (Winston 2). As hindsight once again proves to be impervious to imperfections, the inaction by France and Britain would prove to be detrimental not only to Europe, but the whole world. Hitler's gamble worked. His stunning success bolstered his rule at home and he was out of the box (uh oh). W.N. Medlicott, Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1919-1939 DOUGLAS WINTON, web Re militarization. doc Richard Good, (6th edition) The Twentieth Century A Brief Global History. Boston: McGraw Hill.