Homosexual Marriage example essay topic

Note: This essay contains opinions NOT shared by the host of this web site. In this age of liberation and relative morality it is no surprise that homosexuals have tried very hard to gain ground in the way of civil rights. Homosexuals say they want equal rights, and they want homosexual-marriages to be legalized. However, what they are asking for is not reasonable. They are humans; and therefore they already have the same rights as every other human living in America. What homosexuals want are special privileges and the acceptance of homosexuality as a natural alternative lifestyle.

I believe that homosexual-marriages should never be legalized in America first because homosexuality is not a natural alternative lifestyle, second, marriage is already clearly defined, and third because homosexuals already have the same rights, they want special privileges, and since homosexuality is not in innate quality they don't deserve them. People who have been misinformed about what the homosexual agenda is think that homosexual marriage is natural and that it should be legalized. I however, am opposed to this because homosexuality is not a natural alternative lifestyle. First let's define homosexuality. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, homosexuality is "having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex".

Men and women are obviously biologically different. People of the same sex having intercourse goes against what is biologically natural. Part of the homosexual agenda is to make people believe that homosexuals are the same as heterosexuals when it comes to engaging in sexual behavior. This is absolutely not true. In his book Cassel's Queer Companion, a Dictionary of Lesbian and Gay Life and Culture, William Stewart describe some of the sexual activities that homosexuals practice.

These include "fisting, when one partner shoves his whole hand up the anus of the other partner;"rimming, when one partner licks the anus of the other partner". In the essay Homosexual Rights: What's Wrong, written by Brad Hamton and John Eldredge, they stated that "The U.S. taxpayer-funded Mapplethorpe photos... portrayed typical homosexual behavior: fisting (thrusting one's fist up another's anus), urinating into another's mouth (in this case, a child's), and sadomasochism. The average homosexual has 20-106 different partners per year-300-500 in a life time" How can this be compared to heterosexual intercourse How is this natural It isn't; this type of sexual behavior - even if it were practiced by heterosexuals - cannot be considered natural, in fact there are many states that have anti-sodomy laws though not enforced. As part of their agenda homosexuals not only want these things to be accepted and protected by the government, they also want them to be taught in public school as part of the sex education curriculum. Homosexuals believe they deserve the right to get married that since they think they are an oppressed minority. Let me first define marriage; according to the American Heritage Dictionary marriage is defined as "The legal union of a man and a woman as husband and wife".

It does not say "the legal union of man and man as husband and husband"; nor does it say "the legal union of woman and woman as wife and wife". Marriage has a clear definition a definition that has been around since civilization began. Why are homosexuals trying to redefine the meaning of something so sacred and natural like marriage when there are many other options that offer the same benefits Marriage is the key to family stability, which in turn is the key to a stable society. However, if homosexual-marriage is allowed, it will pervert and bastardize the significance of marriage.

In an essay printed by Common Sense Now, the author basically argues that children need a normal mother and father type of structure so that they are properly nurtured by parents of opposite sexes. This ensures a more natural upbringing. Since homosexual means "same sex", the results of this type of upbringing for a child may prove more detrimental than good. I believe that since the beginning of time, marriage has always been saved for a man and a woman, it should stay that way. Homosexuals claim they are a minority and are pleading the government to give them equal rights.

They form groups like the "queer nation" to make it look like they are an oppressed people. This is absolutely ludicrous! Unless they go through what African Americans have been through, homosexuals have no clue as to oppression is. In the Wall Street Journal, July 18, 1991, page B 1, a chart was published comparing a true minority, African Americans, to a false minority, homosexuals. The table looks like this: Black Americans Homosexuals Denied the right to vote YES NO Official segregation YES NO Denied access by law to public drinking fountains, restrooms -- -- YES NO Denied access by law to businesses restaurants, barbershops etc. YES NO Verifiable economic hardships as a result of discrimination YES NO Unfortunately, some homosexuals have been the victims of violence because of their lifestyle.

I do not condone this, nor do I feel violence is an answer to the homosexual agenda. It is also understandable that they feel threatened by the violence but as the table shows, homosexuals have not been through anything remotely close to what African Americans have been through. Homosexuals also have no right to special privileges, because according to world renowned scientists, homosexuality is not an immutable characteristic such as skin color or eye color. For example, Masters & Johnson say "We " re born man, woman and sexual beings. We learn our sexual preferences and orientations". Also, Dr. R. Kronenmeyer a renowned clinical psychologist states that "Homosexuals are not born 'that way'.

From my 25 years' experience as a clinical psychologist, I firmly believe that homosexuality is a learned response to early painful experiences and that it can be unlearned". The last example is Dr. Judd Marm or, former president of the American Psychiatric Association, he states that "No one has ever found a single, replicable genetic, hormonal or chemical difference between heterosexuals and homosexuals". Since they are not a true minority, and homosexuality is not an immutable character, homosexuals do not deserve special treatment from the government. Homosexuals claim that they should have minority status, they are not qualified to call themselves a minority as it is shown in the above table and by evidence gathered by experts. Homosexuals want marriages legalized. I think they should leave marriage alone.

There are other options available which would give them similar benefits as heterosexual couples. For instance "domestic partnerships" where they are recognized as being in a formal monogamous relationship which entitles them to many of the same benefits a married couple is entitled to. Though I do not agree with them, many very large companies offer benefits to homosexual couples. Companies like United Airlines, American Airlines and others. Why don't they settle for these alternatives They will not settle for the alternatives because if homosexual-marriage is legalized, they will have won the ultimate battle, the recognition of homosexuality as something natural and acceptable.

In this case I cannot just sit back and do nothing, people should know both sides of the story, the true homosexual agenda which is to make homosexuality seem natural and normal; then they can make up their mind as to whether they will support it or not.