Hook's In Defense Of Voluntary Euthanasia example essay topic

Euthanasia is the act of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment. This is a topic with many opinions and much controversy as to whether or not it should be a legal practice. I have never known anyone close to me with an incurable disease, but if a loved one or I were diagnosed, I would like the option to end the suffering to be available. Therefore, I am pro euthanasia, and furthermore, pro individual choice. There are two essays I have recently read on the subject, each gives two different viewpoints on the topic of euthanasia. In Sidney Hook's In Defense of Voluntary Euthanasia, he believes that "each one should be permitted to make his own choice-especially when no one else is harmed by it".

(404) Hook is pro euthanasia, contrary to Rand Richards Cooper, the author of The Dignity of Helplessness: What Sort of Society Would Euthanasia Create?" Cooper says "I'm looking for an argument with Jack Kevorkian; or rather, one against him". (411) He believes that euthanasia should not be a practice used in society today. Sidney Hook begins his essay by giving a personal, first-hand experience of his own sufferings in his battle with congestive heart failure followed by a massive stroke. He says, ". ...

I asked my physician to discontinue all life-supporting services or show me how to do it". (403) His doctor refused and after months of rehabilitation, finally regained most of his motor skills. He admits that this argument sounds like it is pro euthanasia, however, he gives two major reasons for the right to choose. By using his own personal experience and knowledge, he gives the reader insight to his defense in his opinion. Rand Richards Cooper takes an informal approach in his argument, not giving any cut and dry facts. He uses two indirect experiences through his mother's friend and children in Kenya to convey his ideas.

Sidney Hook expresses his ideas using his own personal terminal illness. He makes his statement using reader sympathy, hoping to impact the reader on a personal level. Rand Richards Cooper uses a similar approach, recognizing the usefulness of informal, but personable persuasions. Hook writes about his own first-hand experience and is thought to be more factual. Cooper on the other hand uses the same technique, but he gives second-hand experiences through children in Kenya and also through his mother's best friend. He himself has no personal understanding of the effects of having an incurable disease, which may indicate to the reader that his ideas are not as concrete as Hook's.

Another difference in the two essays is that Hook believes that". ... the wise man will live as long as he ought, not as long as he can". (404) Cooper believes that there is a circle of life and that a person will die when it is the right time. To conclude, although there are many viewpoints on the topic of euthanasia, I feel that Hook made the better argument in his essay. He made his statements using his own experiences, unlike Cooper, who gave his opinions through second-hand and even third-hand understandings of the topic. I believe that people should have the right to access of euthanasia.