Interference By A Stronger Nation example essay topic

1,112 words
Imperialism Whether for economic, nationalist, or humanitarian reasons, more powerful nations have often interfered with the affairs of weaker nations. These more powerful nations, including the United States, Britain, and several European countries, have in the past exploited less fortunate ones for resources, capital, and knowledge. Yet in return countries located in South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia have gained the technology and capital that, over a period of time and development, improves their quality of life. One point of view could be that imperialism results in oppression and abuse. While this is sometimes a temporary side effect of larger nations adopting protectorates, the long term effects often cause the weaker nation to grow stronger. Even when a country feels they must rebel against their suppressor, they gain a sense of nationalism and independence, resulting in a more distinct culture than before.

Why then, should a country have to withdraw from such interference? Another argument could be that only when needed, should a country be involved with another's affairs. Yet with this point of view most would agree that there would be too much diversity in opinion when deciding exactly when help is needed. Also, countries such as Japan would never have developed, whose primary success was to take the ideas of other nations and better them. Stronger countries must interfere in the affairs of weaker nations for the gain of both nations.

A more powerful nation can better its own economy by sharing the resources of other nations and weaker nations are able to obtain an improved standard of living by learning new technologies that are more advanced than their own. Third world countries can receive food from stronger nations and heathen nations can learn to be civilized from missionaries. Imperialism also follows the laws of social Darwinism, where the "fitter" and more advanced countries must prosper. An excellent example of how imperialism can benefit a weaker nation as well as a stronger, more dominant one is the Treaty of Kanagawa in 1854. This treaty, forced upon the Japanese by the Americans, opened up two Japanese ports to foreign trade as well as meeting other demands of the Americans. Japan's point of view was that by surrendering to the more powerful Americans they could avoid a war that could not be won, and be able to learn new concepts and technologies from the United States that would better their own nation.

While Japan was at peace with the United States, a time called the Meiji Period caused newly learned ideas to change the Japanese government, resulting in the more industrialized and prosperous country we see today. In the mid-1800's, interference by both Britain and France in Africa opened up great opportunities for all nations. Ali borrowed money from many European nations in order to better Egyptian society. With this money he created schools, irrigation, and a powerful military. This interference of European nations allowed France to build the Suez Canal, linking the Mediterranean and Red seas. Britain obtained control over Egypt and the canal because Egypt was going through a great financial crisis.

This allowed European ships to pass through the canal and cut thousands of miles off their travel distance around Africa, bringing a great wealth of trade from Asia that helped all of Europe, especially Britain. This interference both improved the quality of life in Egypt and in the more powerful nations of Europe. It created a needed education system and increased harvests for Egypt, providing further evidence that such interference should be permitted. Probably the greatest achievement of Imperialism would be that of Indian independence. Intervening by Britain in India resulted in the rising to fame of Ghandi, and the non-violent rebellion that followed. Britain's interference led to oppression of the Indian people who appointed Ghandi, a man of great character, as their leader.

Ghandi helped the Indian people to unite against Britain, which created a sense of nationalism that could not be found before the European interference. The rebellion later resulted in the union of the Hindu people and the formation of India. Certainly India would never have developed this sense of nationalism without the British intervening, proving that even negative interference can, in the long run, prove beneficial to the growth of a culture. Often interference by a stronger nation is necessary to stop suffering in a less fortunate nation. This is shown in Third World countries where people do not have access to basic needs such as food, clean drinking water, clothing, and medicine to cure even the most common disease. These are things people of developed nations take for granted and should share with countries where poverty poses a problem.

Other humanitarian reasons to intervene in another nations affairs could be those of religious concerns. Missionaries dedicated to spreading Christian morals such as David Livingstone are able to create a written language for undeveloped cultures to read the bible in. Sometimes referred to as "The White Man's Burden", this helps civilize societies and gives the ma set of morals to follow. One could take the standpoint of social Darwinism where the fittest and most developed nations are to survive. This allows stronger competitors to overtake weaker ones for economic gain.

It is applied when a stronger nation exploits another for land, resources, and money. Use of this theory has resulted in the creation of Canada, the United States, and many other former European colonies. By exploiting natives, European nations (primarily Britain and France) were able to create colonies that bettered their economy. When these colonies became independent and rebelled, it created an even more powerful and nationalistic country, the United States. This knew country then created a theory using social Darwinism called Manifest Destiny where Americans believed they would soon conquer all of North America. Thus the struggle for survival of the fittest went on.

These theories of Darwinism are easily be used to justify the imperialistic views of more powerful nations. By learning from the past it is easy to see that nations help each other when imperialism occurs, and even when oppression of some nations does happen, a stronger, more patriotic nation is able to come to power. Through helping themselves, stronger nations are able to create economic conditions beneficial to all nations. Allowing stronger nations to intervene in the matters of weaker nations should be encouraged for the growth of both countries.