Kid To Child Abuse In Homes example essay topic

Schools are failing to provide the kind of educational experience we want for our children, . In too many of these schools, expectations of students are low, teachers and parents are frustrated, and academic performance is poor. This is part by the schools not being strict enough. The teachers of today can not correct a kid like they should unless they get slapped with a lawsuit.

You can't take a kid into the hall and paddle them with out someone calling for abuse. Also when kids get into fights they suspend them instead of trying to make the kid understand. If you ruin a child's grades once then they will always make bad grades. Particularly in the highest-poverty schools, where many students fail to meet even minimum standards of achievement, the need for change is urgent.

They need more financial aid from the government and make sure that the kids do not miss behave. Also these schools should be more worried about the students welfare than there own finances. They should make fundamental changes-changes that will create a safe, orderly environment that focuses on high standards of teaching and learning for all students. When the schools improve they should get extra benefits for there accomplishments, instead of being pushed aside because they are in a low income area. Kids these days are getting less and less education. The reason for this is schools not be strict enough.

The schools are to lenient, and the children get away with to much. If an administrator paddles a kid the school gets suede and the administrator. That is completely wrong, that should never happen. When a teacher can get in trouble for anything they don't want to do anything anymore. Last year the rate schools and teachers being suede for correcting a kid to child abuse in homes was five to one. Although child abuse is bad, there not be more lawsuits for correcting child note more.

The ineffectiveness of corporal punishment can be understood in the context of its being a very simplistic and indiscriminate remedy for a variety of differing kinds of problems. At the expense of the child, the teacher or parent can in this way drain off his or her own frustrations while being relieved of the burden of exercising patience and emotional restraint, and of attempting to understand the reasons for the child's misbehavior. The classroom situation is analogous to the home situation; and the child who is experiencing emotional difficulty at home will, in all probability, repeat the pattern at school. It is this child especially who is in need of rational, consistent and firm but compassionate discipline.

"Clobbering" this type of child can only intensify and further complicate his real problems while instilling either fear or a smoldering and long lasting resentment against adults and against school. Frequently, the child who consistently misbehaves or expresses his feelings in a manner which hurts either himself or others is telling us that he needs help badly. The classroom teacher can ignore him, punish him, or he can attempt to understand and help him. Corporal punishment is no less destructive and ineffective with such other types of children as " (a) delinquent children, whose code of violence is only further enhanced by spanking; (b) suspicious children, who provoke the adult to 'prove' his enemy status in their eyes; (c) children who are having trouble in the learning process and who express their frustration, anxiety or guilt in aggressive actions which draw punishment, which then further alienates them from learning; and (d) the 'cash and carry' customer who cheerfully submits to punishment so that he can continue a pattern of irresponsibility for his own actions.

Aside from the fact that violence as a method of coping or of avoiding coping is deeply embedded in the fabric of our country's values and that the arbitrary use of physical force in dealing with others is often not only condoned but rewarded, it is by no means difficult to understand why many teachers and parents are reluctant to examine or change this behavior. As human beings, all of us are frequently tempted to respond to frustrating situations and interpersonal conflict with physical force. We are especially tempted when the people with whom we are in conflict are smaller and weaker than we are and when we can do so with impunity and justify the action by telling ourselves that it served the best interest of the child. In most cases, however, common sense and the rules of a civilized society do not permit us to settle differences by aggressing physically against the object of our frustration. Common sense tells us that other adults simply would not allow themselves to be subjected to physically abusive treatment without retaliating in kind. How many of us would voluntarily subject ourselves to the pain of a wooden paddle following a disagreement with our employer?

The point is, very clearly that in an adult world physical ways of handling conflicts are usually neither available nor permissible, let alone acceptable. Thus, an official school policy which condones bully tactics is in effect teaching students by example that this is an acceptable way of handling problems. Having been taught the efficacy of rule by bully, it should not surprise us that such children will subsequently apply that rule in their dealings with others, weaker then themselves, and continue to perpetuate the myths that reliance on physical force is the mark of manliness and that might makes right.