Killer The Death Penalty example essay topic

"An Eye for an Eye' From the beginning of time, crime has been evident in human existence, and from the first crime "And it came to pass, when they were in a field, that Cain rose up against his brother, Able, and slew him" (Genesis 4: 8) there has always been punishment. Cain faced the punishment of being ostracized from his colony and sent to wander as a vagabond and a fugitive for his crime (Genesis 4: 14). He was also branded with the mark of a murderer. Thus this shows us that crime in human life is inevitable. Crime is defined as, an act of violation against society and its laws. Punishment is the consequence of the crime.

In society today murders are committed daily. Murderers' actions are getting more and more incomprehensive. They are no longer just committing murder: they are torturing, mutilating, and engaging in grossly inappropriate acts against fellow human beings. Behaviors such as this will continue if nothing is done to stop them. The Death Penalty is considered the harshest form of punishment enforced today. It is the legal infliction of death on persons' convicted of a crime.

It is irrevocable; it ends the existence of those punished, instead of temporarily imprisoning them. People say that the death penalty is wrong morally because it is the cruel and inhumane taking of a life however; others feel that it is the only way for justice to be carried out. The Death Penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment. The methods of execution include electrocution, hanging, firing squad, lethal injection, and the gas chamber.

The most widely used form of execution has been electrocution. With this method of executing a prisoner, the individual is strapped to a chair along with electrodes attached all over the body. The executioner then proceeds to throw the switch sending vast amounts of electricity flowing throughout the prisoner. During this period, the prisoners flesh burns, and the body shakes violently from the overdose of electricity.

When it is all over, smoke is seen coming from the head of the corpse. The methods by which most executions are carried out can involve physical torture. For example in 1983, at the scene of the execution of Mr. Evans, he was given three charges of electricity over a period of fourteen minutes. After the first and second charges, Mr. Evans was still conscious and smoke was coming from all over his body, as a result from his flesh burning. An official at the prison tried to stop the execution on account of it being cruel punishment, but he was unsuccessful. Also, on December 12, 1984, at the scene of Alpha Stephens execution, the first jolt failed to kill him, he struggled for eight minutes before a second jolt finished the job.

The first jolt took two minutes, and then there was a six-minute pause. During this six-minute pause the body had to cool before physicians could examine him and declare another jolt was needed. Stephens took twenty three breaths, during that six-minute interval. Such incidents prove that the death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. To many, the death penalty is a euphemism for legally killing people. The death penalty demeans the moral order and execution is not legalized murder, but it is the coldest, most premeditated form of homicide.

The end result is the same, one more dead body, one more set of grieving parents, and one more cemetery slot. Every time we execute someone, we are desensitizing the value of human life. It epitomizes the tragic inefficacy and brutality of the resort of violence rather than reason for the solution. The death penalty is not a sound principle of criminal justice.

If you kill someone you should be given the death penalty. The death of the killer would give family and friends of the victim a bit of ease over the death. In addition, the death should not be prolonged and should be done immediately. By giving the death penalty to someone, it is fair and very just.

If you kill someone, you deserve to die and not stay in jail. If a man kills a man and is convicted he should be ready to die next. When you give a killer the death penalty, it would reassure the people close to the victim it would not happen again. It also gives the victim's family the feeling that the death of the victim has been avenged.

America's legal system is meant to rid society of evil, and by killing the murderers it gives an example to others. By doing this we are keeping society safe from monstrous acts of killers, by taking away their lives. There is a difference between premeditated murder and a criminal's execution. When a murderer kills someone, there is no trial, there was no crime committed, and there is no reason why that person should loose their life.

An execution is not wrong because this person has committed a crime that is punishable by death. This person is so un compassionate for human beings and just does not care what happens to anyone. If they are sick enough to take the life of someone else, their life should be taken also. By executing a murderer that person has no chance of ever killing another person again. If we allow these murderers to live they still have a life. They can still visit and communicate with their families.

The victim will never see there loved ones again. With society being the way that it is today, with kids killing in schools and people shooting or stabbing other people because they are wearing the wrong colors or a drug deal gone badly, capital punishment needs to be enforced. As American citizens were are all born with certain rights. With these rights however, come responsibilities. When a person takes the life and rights of another human being they forfeit their rights. In the past, people have invariably felt that if they had been wronged in some way, it was their right to take vengeance on the person that had wronged them.

This mentality still exists today. Opposition to the death penalty does not arise from misplaced sympathy for convicted murderers. On the contrary, murder demonstrates a lack of respect for human life. For this very reason, murder is abhorrent, and any policy of state authorized killings is immoral. Executions give society the unmistakable message that human life no longer deserves respect. When the death penalty is brought out in the society, basically everything has an effect on it.

Religion, race, cost, and morals, but it is still used in America today. The time has come for us to realize that we cannot stop killing with more killing. Supporters of the death penalty feel that criminals should be punished for their crimes. They want to make examples out of offenders so that the threat of death will be enough to stop them from committing such horrible crimes. Capital punishment ensures peace of mind to the world by ensuring the murderers will never kill again. Without a suitable punishment for crimes, justice will never truly be served to those that have suffered damages or losses.

It is suggested that a person's position on the issue of the death penalty is not determined by a rationale evaluation of the arguments for and against, but is an emotionally based, moral opinion, that may be based on vengeance. The Pope of the Catholic Church once said, "Only God has the Power to give and take life from someone.".