Known As A Frequent Publisher Of Staff example essay topic

Case Review In Assuming the Role of Jerri Friedman, I Have Assembled to Key Members of My Editorial Staff. Bradley Stevens, the Assistant Director, and Jessica Long the Editor in Chief. Overall, Our Mission Is to Choose Whether or Not to Publish McCullough's Manuscript. Mr. Stevens Presents a Strong Case Opposing Manuscript, and Ms. Long Presents the Viewpoint That Is Indifference and Would Perhaps Allowed the Manuscript to Be Published. To Insure Domestic Tranquility: Defending America's Schools Is Merely a Hypothetical Idea That Was Derived within the Walls of Our Campus and we do recognize the social implications. However, this is a prime example of the situation in which the message can be misconstrued and applied to the negative aspects of the social implications.

Granted, most of the mainstream publishers have denied publishing book. However, it's irresponsible for us to ignore the fact that McCullough is in fact, a member of our staff. As the University Publishing Co. we have a responsibility to our fellow staff members as well as our students to give them and open line of communication, including the written word, which is protected under the First Amendment. This definitely another constitutional right at hand here; that is, the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms.

We " ve seen McCullough's manuscript, as well as his constitutional backing. He has pointed out that there would be a screening process done to any and all persons. That would in fact, the armed in his situation. On the negative side of this possible armed situation, Of course there is the probability or possibility for further violence.

If in fact, there was an altercation that came about. Firearms to give people an added sense of power. This power can easily be abused in any given conflict. Proper training, to the staff members that are in fact, armed with side arms, would reduce this potential danger.

Unfortunately, in a conflict, the average human being relies more on instinct than intellect, this is where the short fuse to mass hysteria comes into play. It is important to point out that this manuscript is theoretical and by no means is being introduced into the University policy by being published through the University Publishing Co. Mr. Stevens said pointed out that we take a lot of heat for publishing this work and has editor is. It is our job to publish works based on merit, and so, if we do publish this work. We are endorsing the credibility of McCullough's manuscript and putting our own credibility to certain organizations on the line. Within Chapter nine the book points out, media has a high visibility and potential influence, because of that there is a sensitive moral position within society.

Now the issues surrounding media and antisocial behavior generally fall into two categories: 1) being the practitioners commission of antisocial acts in connection with their professional obligations and 2) the media's influence on antisocial behavior. These are both strong viewpoints, and applying them to this case, there is nothing malicious or illegal about, arming adults. As a situation that deals completely with human social behavior, which is always in inexact science meeting the only thing predictable about humans in their behavior ease the unpredictability factor. As publishers of the written word, we realize that whatever we publish is up to the interpretation of the reader, whether or not that person uses what we have given them for good or for bad, we have no control over. Decision In weighing both sides of the case both sides do in fact, have strong arguments. And so custom difficulty to make this decision, however, I have chosen to publish the book.

Turning this decision internally by conscious would be more bothered hand, I taken it upon myself to censor the works of Mr. McCullough. I do in fact understand it's up to me to make that decision, but in this situation. I merely making a decision based upon merit of this work and not on the concept. If Professor McCall was not in fact, a brilliant man he would not then be a member of the staff at this University.

Since I have great pride in the University that I work for and feel fact. I am here to serve that University and am to reflect positively upon my professional colleagues being fellow staff members such as Mr. McCullough. This decision, then justifies both the institution, and my colleagues. Since there is no financial gain here for either Mr. McCullough or me so to speak that really did not become a factor in my decision.

Had it possibly been a scenario in which there was a guaranteed lump sum of money, or perhaps a mention all, a financial undertaking. Then it would have come about. Support is the objects of my moral judgment. This would more include the continuity of the University / and more so the publishing department. I feel that in this area, we are justified to make this decision. As a move forward, merely a concept introduced to the society that we are working towards fixing.

If we muffle the malts of the persons with new ideas, whether they are straight laced ideas or even perhaps off the mark ideas. We will in fact, then are serving ourselves an injustice a buy publishing this work, the controversial hit shows an attitude of openness toward communication and speed movement forward for our social well-being. The most important point made in this case is that I am the initial gatekeeper and am known as a frequent publisher of staff works. This fact shows, even if I approve the project, it still won't necessarily be published. I have not discounted or discriminated against university faculty in the past, and don't see a reason to start. The merit of those other works caused them to be printed without basing the decision on whether their topic is safe.

I surely do not want to become a censor and this is why I am printing the book..