Lan Ethernet And Wan Tdm Networks example essay topic

Metro Ethernet Disclaimer; this is intended to be an introductory technical article; certain details have been excluded in the interests of space and clarity. Network design examples are presented to illustrate specific technical points and are not intended to fully complete. Historically WAN's (Wide Area Networks) and LAN's (Local Area Networks) have relied on independent technologies. At a physical layer WAN technologies today continue to be based largely on legacy TDM systems that were built initially to support voice, video and early data communications in a reliable fashion. WAN connectivity over distance often requires the use of regenerator's and meet points between multiple Telco suppliers that may span the globe. Without strict adherence to standards, these connections would not function.

WAN technologies depend on highly complex and expensive equipment, which can guarantee inter-operability and "five 9's" reliability required to support the millions of paying customers utilizing the network. Meanwhile, the advent of early PC's and the recognition of the value in networking devices together gave rise to Local Area Networks. These LAN's were developed from a business customer perspective, which placed more emphasis on costs and ease of use over reliability. There were a number of different competing LAN technologies, two of the most common being Token Ring (IBM) and Ethernet (everyone else). The triumph of Ethernet in the marketplace, to the extent where it is included in every PC, game console and some refrigerators, provides a consistent and relatively inexpensive way to build internal networks with relative ease. As the internal PC networks continued to grow and thrive a need to connect disparate facilities together resulted in development of bridges, gateways and ultimately routers for the sole purpose of connecting LANs to other LAN's located anywhere from several miles to several thousand miles apart.

These devices allow disparate interface types to be connected by performing the necessary modifications to the signal and protocols to allow WAN and LAN equipment to understand one another. Because LAN Ethernet and WAN TDM networks were so vastly different in their technical make-up these intermediary devices were needed to allow inter-communication to occur. While the benefits of enterprise connectivity are great, they come at the cost of special hardware, software and application complexity as the speed of the network can change by a factor of 100 between a client and the server (100 Meg bit per second Ethernet to 1.5 Meg bit per second WAN). The ever increasing speed of LAN technology (Gig Ethernet is now at Best Buy), and in PCs and servers in addition to increasing complexity of applications and the need to exploit the large amount of data that already exists, causes users to require connectivity that is faster, cheaper, and more simple to own and operate. In recognition of these demands the telecom m industry has been working for the past several years to develop common standards, which will allow domestic and international end-to-end Ethernet services to be deployed as easily as T 1. Today these standards do not yet exist.

Metro Ethernet is a generic name for a set of services that are used to replace traditional WAN connectivity with Ethernet connectivity. The use of the term Metro is because the normal range of these services is in the 10's of miles and that is thought of as a Metropolitan area. There are several drivers for Metro Ethernet. First the low cost of Ethernet hardware. While the cost of an OC-3 (155 Mb) ATM interface is in the 1000's of dollars, the cost of a Gigabit Ethernet port in a switch is in the 100's or 10's of dollars.

The other enabler is the increased deployment of what are called multi service networks by the carriers. Multiservice networks are networks that are able to be used for multiple service offerings with the same network infrastructure. The services are voice, Internet access, dial access and so on. Multiservice networks can be implemented on several layers of the ISO model from fiber to SONET to IP depending on the carriers and its base of equipment. Many carriers offer several technologies for multi service networks. We are initially using Metro Ethernet to replace SONET based WAN services with Ethernet services the difference can be shown below.

The traditional WAN environment used in extended campus is below Here a Layer 3 Ethernet switch is connected to a router which is connected to an ATM switch which is connected to the carrier. The router and its associated interfaces is a rather expensive system and costs upward of $20,000 with bandwidth limited to 155 Mbps. To increase the bandwidth beyond 155 Mbps would involve an expensive upgrade or replacement of the router. In the metro case the Ethernet switch is connected directly to Telco equipment.

At this time we use a 1 Gig bps connection with a bandwidth from the Telco of 155 Meg. This dynamic bandwidth works much like the Committed Information Rate that we use when we provision remote Frame Relay WAN connections. This can be increased by the Telco without the need of us upgrading or replacing any of our equipment. The Ethernet switch acts as a router and even supports BGP allowing us to dual attach this site either with a second metro Ethernet or to the MCI MPLS Layer 3 network to provide dynamic DR and direct attachment to non local data centers.

We can also (when the provider supports it) leverage BGP support to attach to the Internet via metro Ethernet. EIS has recognized the evolution of Metro Ethernet seamless LAN connectivity between locations over any distance. Although the industry has not yet reached the point where Telco Ethernet services are ubiquitous we have decided to remain on the forefront of this evolution by pushing the technology when an opportunity arises. In partnership with our current providers EIS began the process of understanding where each supplier stood on the evolutionary scale. Initial opportunities were first presented through traditional R BOC suppliers who began offering local metro services within the past two years. We deployed the original metro Ethernet solution in 2003 by connecting Willow Rd. plaza to the Northbrook campus.

Additional Ethernet connectivity was provided between Northbrook and the new Oak Brook recovery center in 2004, which provides the added benefit of working over SONET. It has only been recently that many access vendors have begun offering Ethernet over SONET as the Telco max vendors have developed the necessary hardware cards to support Ethernet on the same chassis as traditional TDM. Another way we can use Metro Ethernet is to provide greater survivability were we have a group of locations in a single city. Examples of this are in Lincoln NE and NTN I. Now we place redundant links in a central site where if something should affect that site, we would loose the satellite sites. Instead we put one link each in to two locations and metro Ethernet them together.

In this way not only do we have redundant links but additional redundancy at the building level. This is shown below: In Northern Illinois there are two services that make this possible. For sites that we already have or can easily add SONET, there is the Ethernet over SONET services. Ethernet over SONET leverages our existing SONET infrastructure and allows us to transport Ethernet traffic along side our existing ATM data, and voice traffic. We get the redundancy and reliability benefits of the SONET technology with the ability to exploit it at a cheaper price. Our interface to the SONET infrastructure is a fiber or copper Ethernet cable; we do not need to do anything special on the Ethernet switch to use the service.

To the switches each end (say South Barrington and Home Office) look like they are directly connected like F tower or WRP appears to the switch infrastructure in the data center of G building in Home Office. The other service is called Giga Man. This uses dedicated fiber from the Telco to provide Ethernet connectivity. It cannot be used for other services but we only use this service when we do not have or do not wish to deploy SONET to that building. It works the same as Ethernet over SONET as far as the Ethernet switches are concerned. The primary difference is what equipment is deployed by the Telco to support the service.

We are using both of these technologies in Northern Illinois depending on the specific location we are connecting. Other providers in other geographic areas offer the same or similar services the primary difference being branding. In summary the benefits of Metro Ethernet are: Lower capital equipment costs Lower monthly bandwidth costs Simpler network configurations Increased flexibility to increase bandwidth without the need for disruptive equipment upgrades Can be leveraged to provide DR in remote sites The current limitations of Metro Ethernet are: Limited geographical coverage Some service characteristics like SLAs and QoS support are not equivalent to WAN technologies Limited availability Future iterations will begin to include the traditional switched WAN cloud, which will eventually consist of a mix of TDM and Ethernet services. Migrating to MPLS technology will ease the transition to Ethernet wide area links as carrier ATM and frame-relay switches are slowly replaced by multi-service routers. Eventually the cost point for Ethernet should be lower than that of telecom m TDM circuits within the wide area supplier market - this has not yet occurred.

Many Ethernet WAN offerings today include higher costs than what is charged for TDM. In the end the migration to Ethernet will occur but only as the price point for service reaches well below current TDM pricing. Additionally, improved SLA's, QOS and packaged service offerings must be developed by the IXC suppliers to continue to increase the use of Ethernet as a WAN replacement technology.