Marks On A Fired Bullet example essay topic

In 1784, someone using a flintlock pistol shot Edward Culshaw. In those days, there were no bullets, as we know them. Gunpowder and a ball of lead were put into the gun's muzzle and packed with paper wadding. A spark made when the gun's hammer struck some flint at the back end of the barrel ignited the powder. When the constable examined Culshaw's wound, he found a piece of newspaper used as wadding to pack the powder in the killer's gun.

The prime suspect in the killing was a man named John Toms. When a piece of newspaper found in Toms' pocket was compared with the piece found in the wound, the pieces fit together like two pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Based on the evidence, Toms was easily convicted. The Toms case was probably the first in America in which ballistics was used to solve a crime. Much like in Toms case, most investigations start with a crime having been committed. Forensic ballistics and firearm investigation start when there are bullets, cartridges, a weapon, or any combination of the above found at a crime scene.

With the evidence, a crime lab can search for clues on these items that could lead to a suspect or possibly prove that the items were used in the crime. By comparing the markings on bullets or cartridges found at the scene with those fired from a suspect's weapon, a ballistics expert can often determine if the rounds came from the same weapon. Just the act of cycling a cartridge through a weapon without firing it can leave permanent scratches in the case that are unique to the weapon. When a suspect's weapon is examined in the lab, it will be test fired into a box filled with cotton or a tank of water to provide the examiner with the bullets and cartridges with a known history. Using a microscope, the known cartridges are compared with the ones in question.

With some patience, skill, and a little luck, experts can definitively say that a certain firearm and no other fired this bullet, or ejected this cartridge. The value of luck cannot be overstated. A bullet may leave the muzzle of a weapon at over a thousand feet per second and slam into a concrete wall. This may deform the round beyond all recognition.

Just about anything can and does happen to flying projectiles. Soft lead bullets are known to flatten out when they hit hard objects or even when they just hit plain water. Copper jacketed bullets may come loose from their jackets or disintegrate into numerous sharp pieces. When a cartridge is fired, the pressure generated, which may be anything from two to over twenty tons per square inch, forces the case back against the breech face.

This causes the individuality of the breech face to be imprinted on the base of the cartridge. In other words, the firearm leaves it's "finger-print" or "thumb-mark" is imprinted naturally varies with the pressure, but its image will always be present even though it is sometimes difficult to detect. The bullet travels down the length of a gun barrel, and the hardened steel of the barrel wears the softer lead or copper of the bullet away ever so slightly. Tiny imperfections, which were introduced into the rifling, the gentle twisting groove pattern scribed into a gun barrel, when it was first manufactured, are created in the surface of the bullet. These markings are also unique as a fingerprint for the weapon.

Guns of the same make produce striations, the scratch-like impressions left on the projectile, which are similar but not identical. There are usually several places where the hard steel of the weapon leaves its mark on the softer metal of the ammunition. The bullet is usually made of a lead or jacketed copper, both of which are softer than steel. The cartridge that remains in the gun will also have scratches and impressions made by the firing pin and extractor.

When a bullet or a casing is collected from a crime scene, examiners can often assist investigators by observing details about it without waiting for a firearm to be discovered. With a few exceptions, the direction of twists and number of lands and grooves impressed into the bullets or the nature of the scratches left in a cartridge case can give investigators an idea of which make of weapon might have fired it. A direction of twist refers to the right or left hand spin given to the bullet as it exits the barrel. Grooves are the cuts in the barrel form "lands", the term for the metal ridges remaining between the grooves. It is the lands that grip the bullet and give it a twist as it speeds through.

Smith & Wesson guns are known for having five lands twisting to the right. Colts are known to have six to the left. But unfortunately, there are exceptions to this rule. To determine the direction of twist, one would point the bullet away from them and look down from above it.

The marks on a fired bullet having a right twist will angle to the right as they go from the base to the nose. Left twist bullets have marks angling to the left. Then the number of marks around the whole bullet is added up. If two rounds are placed base to base, examiners can sometimes tell at a glance if they should be looking for more than one firearm. If the lands do not match up in twist and number, or if the bullets are of different caliber, there is not point in trying to compare them microscopically, for this usually takes great effort.

In the late 1920's, Phillip O. Gravelly invented a microscope through which the images formed by two lenses could be viewed side by side through a single lens, and displayed in a slip screen image. A ballistic expert using this microscope (called a comparison microscope) could compare the images of two bullets and easily tell whether the striations on the bullets matched. Most of these microscopes are equipped with photography equipment. This is done for identification purposes. Any evidence of identification, which is unsupported by photographs, cannot be regarded as being anything more than an expression of opinion. Photographs are essential, and must be taken through the microscope for the easy identification of the court.

Examiners often make several test fires through an evidence weapon and then try to match them under the scope before looking at the evidence bullets. It can happen that sequentially fired bullets do not match each other though they know the rounds were fired from the same weapon. This is not very common, but it can indicate some fouling of the barrel or other short-lived effects. Another set of test fires usually produces good matches.

To perform a bullet "match", an examiner places a test fired bullet under one lens of the comparison microscope and the questioned bullet, recovered from a body, for example, under another. There must be a significant number of striations, or scratches, on the surface of the test-fired bullet, which line up with the striations of the questioned bullet. In the more than sixty years since these techniques were developed, there have been attempts to automate or improve on this procedure, all with out success. Slowly, examiners rotate the bullet, measuring the widths of the land impressions made by the weapon's barrel.

Seeing similar striations on both the test fired bullet and the evidence bullet, and the examiner can decide if the bullets are only similar or if they really match. Many times the match is a judgment call and the examiner has to call for a second opinion from another examiner. In the case of the clear, unmistakable matches, two examiners will agree without hesitation. It is in the cases that are not so clear that they earn their salaries.

How many scratches have to line up before it is considered a match? There is no universally accepted rule. Examiners stay sharp knowing that their work will most certainly be challenged if the results have any real impact on the case at all. In today's fast paced world of information shared online, the fingerprint and DNA databases have become among the most powerful weapons in the law enforcement arsenal. Not to be outdone, firearms identification specialist have come up with versions of their own databases. Both the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) and the ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms) have developed computerized systems that store images of bullets, cartridge cases, and related information.

When local crime labs have a shooting case they can capture a digital image of the bullet or cartridge case and compare it with data already entered by the federal agencies or other crime labs that are online. The FBI's system is called DRUGFIRE, so named to attack the gun related violence associated with drug trafficking. The ATF has a pair of similar programs called BULLETPROOF for bullet images and BRASS CATCHER for the cartridge case information. Future plans call for the two systems to be fully integrated to allow information to be shared between all agencies having the necessary computerized hardware. In only a few years, over sixty five thousand cases have been entered into the DRUGFIRE database. The data entry is the result of the hard work of numerous examiners and technicians in hundreds of local crime labs.

The system has already proved its usefulness in over two thousand five hundred cases where "hits" or links to other cases have been made in the same or different states, cities, ad jurisdictions. Previously unrelated cases have been discovered to be linked by firearms evidence. As technology improves, and information shared on a global medium, it will only become easier for law enforcement to identify bullets, cartridges, and firearms from anywhere in the world. Current methods of investigation and identification are already responsible for the conviction of many criminals.

And you can bet as we stretch into the twenty-first century, new methods and computer automation will lead to the conviction of many more who choose to commit crimes with firearms. Burrard, Gerald, Sir. Identification of Firearms and Forensic Ballistics. London Greenberg.

1951. Davis, John E. Tool Marks, Firearms and the Stria graph. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas. 1958. Gardner, Robert. Crime Lab 101: Experimenting with Crime Detection.

New York: Walker and Company. 1992. Hatcher, Julian S., Frank J. Jury, and Jac Weller. Firearms Investigation and Identification, and Evidence. Harrisburg: The Stackpole Company. 1957.

Heard, Brian J. Handbook of Firearms and Ballistics: Examining and Interpreting Forensic Evidence. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 1997. House, John. Crime Lab: A Guide for Non scientists.

Ventura: Calico Press, LLC. 1999.