Massacre At El Mozote example essay topic
It was a town that was seen as a last resort for fleeing civilians. There was supposed to be safe harbor there, as the rebels and army would be doing their fighting in the woods, away from civilians. On December 8th, peasants were straggling one by one into El Mozote, and were stretching the limits of the small town (Danner 34). Even the town mayor was under the impression that the citizens of El Mozote would be given clemency.
They were instructed to keep off of the streets, to stay inside to avoid the fighting. Marcos Diaz, the mayor, recounts his seeming betrayal, "Wait! , he pleaded, They promised me nothing would happen to the people here. The officers told me so" (Donner 64). he was correct, the citizens of El Mozote were supposed to have clemency, they were not to be harmed. A supposed "elite, American trained" arm of the Salvadorian army, Atlacatl were acting on their own. They had basic training from the Americans, but their extensive training came at the hands of Monterrosa (Donner 50). These seemingly advanced troops were anything but.
They "shot animals and smeared the blood all over their faces, they slit open the animal's bellies and drank the blood" (Donner 50). So, a renegade unit led by a renegade general were supposed to show mercy to a guerrilla infested hamlet? The answer would become obvious. An important source of information during this otherwise chaotic time was Radio Venceremos. This renegade radio station broadcasted from a hidden location. It informed the civilians where to go, and what was going on in the war (Donner 34).
El Mozote did not harbor guerrillas. As stated by Danner, "They were victims of this whole thing... If they could get away by giving guerrillas some corn and chickens, and still live on their farms, that is what they would do. At the same time, if the people had to get by by giving corn and chickens to the half a dozen Guardia Nacional who were living in their town, then they would do that - whatever it took to enable them to live" (Danner 119). The massacre was a horrific spectacle.
The men were decapitated in front of their families. "the soldiers dragged the bodies and the heads of the decapitated victims to the convent of the church, where they were piled together" (Donner 70). Next came the women. They took the women into groups and lied to them citing that they would be able to go free to their homes, once they had been separated. Instead, the soldiers marched the women into the hills surrounding El Mozote known as El Chin go and La Cruz (Donner 71). The women were systematically raped, some as young as ten years old. These barbarians came back and took the women group by group.
Eventually, once they were done, they led the women into houses. Amrosiano Claros' house was one of them, and they torched the houses, burning the women alive (Donner 73). The facade that anyone would walk away from El Mozote was quickly abandoned. They were all going to die at the hands of a crazed renegade branch of the Salvadorian army, headed by a ruthless leader that held idol status among his men.
The final stage in the purge was the destruction of the children of El Mozote. Soldiers were overheard conveying some degree of humanity in that they did not want kill children. But, as was said by the other solider "We have orders to finish everyone and we have to complete our orders. That is it" (Donner 75). There were perhaps thirty children that were being killed in a variety of inhumane ways. Donner recounts an interview with a man named Chep e Mozote, that he saw the soldiers. "they slit some of the kids throats, and many they hanged from a tree".
He luckily got away, but the rest of the children did not fare as well. There were disagreements among the soldiers as to what to do with the children in the schoolhouse. Finally, they strafed the schoolhouse with bullets from their American automatic weapons and burned the schoolhouse and everything inside of it. So ended the massacre at El Mozote, everything dead and decimated, with corpses strewn about the town.
They were some survivors. Rufina Amaya recounted a unbelievable story about how she was able to escape from the soldiers, in a crab tree (Donner 73). She was forced to watch as the soldiers were murdering her children, and she could not even cry. Finally, she scurried away under brush as the killing had stopped, and the soldiers had lost interest. Rufina Amaya first told her story to Raymond Bonner, at The New York Times bureau in Mexico City.
The story provoked much interest, but unfortunately no one was willing to go into the war torn area, and the account was largely disbelieved. Finding the truth of exactly what happened in El Mozote is a very hard thing to do. Records were not accurately kept, and the area remained very war torn for a long period of time after the massacre at El Mozote. The United State's account of the events at El Mozote start by accounting the massacre "Although it is not possible to prove or disprove excesses of violence against the civilians population of El Mozote by Government troops, it is certain that the guerrilla forces did nothing to remove them from the path of battle" (Donner 111). This at least recognizes that they do not know the exact details of the massacre, but they do realize that one occurred. Subsequent interviews by United States Ambassador and the war-monger Domingo Monte rossa seemed to have changed the early reports.
After embassy officers were sent to the site of El Mozote, they came back and the Assistant secretary Thomas O. Enders said before the House subcommittee on Inter-American Affairs, "It is clear from the report that there has been a confrontation between the guerrillas occupying Mozote and attacking government forces. There is no evidence to confirm that government forces systematically massacred civilians in the operations zone" (Donner 126). This is very different than their initial reports. So where does the truth lie in the events of El Mozote? I believe that the truth has to be with the survivors. Rufina Amaya has nothing to hide regarding what happened in El Mozote.
The American reports, on the other hand, were justifying policies regarding aid to these armies. They needed to have assurances that no such violations of human rights did, in fact, occur. I believe that Donner does an excellent job in presenting the facts as plainly as possible. He cites a number of sources from a first hand account of the facts by Rufina Amaya, to a number of documents presented by both the Salvadorian government and the American government. He has a collection of front page stories from major newspapers such as the Washington Post, and the New York Times. Also are the interviews with Domingo Monterrosa and soldiers that were part of Atlacatl.
Based on such a wide variety of published sources, i think that Donner did an excellent job at presenting the information so that the reader could decide as to what really happened on that December in northern El Salvador. Before reading this, I, like I am sure so many others, had no idea of the magnitude of injustices that can occur during these conflicts. Also, this was not very long ago, nor far away, and it speaks volumes of the differences in government ideology and politics. El Salvador is an extreme case of how a government will treat its citizens. Massacre at El Mozote truly was an eye-opener and I doubt I will soon forget it.